Capt. Mooron wrote:

There maybe a point you are not considering Rick... the information is a one
way feed. All they need do is supply proposed track and route to the
agencies involved.

??? Who supplies information to whom? Are you saying the merchant ship
should provide some kind of sailing plan to some central agency? Sorry,
no central agency exists and until Homeland Sekurity takes over the
planet, there won't be one.


No information from the agencies or shipping is required.

????? From what agency to whom?

While yachties may find it great sport to track each other around the
world, merchant shipping does not work that way for the most part. Ships
in the "liner trades" such as containerships on specific routes and
voyages keep a schedule like a bus. Some bulkers and tankers still
"tramp" and might change destinations and courses depending on markets.
No merchant ship crew has time or desire to fill out more paperwork just
so yachties can plan to avoid them.

Rick

A bulk freighter berthed at the Philly Port had it's radar going, at
least for the 2 hours I was there. Is there any reason for this? You
think they read Neals' posts about constant watches?

Scotty

Scott Vernon wrote:
A bulk freighter berthed at the Philly Port had it's radar going, at
least for the 2 hours I was there. Is there any reason for this?

Forgot it? Tuning it? Turned it on at "standby" and got delayed?


You think they read Neals' posts about constant watches?

Was there a bunch of guys rolling around on the deck laughing?

Rick

"Jetcap" wrote in message
...
Capt. Mooron wrote:

There maybe a point you are not considering Rick... the information is a
one way feed. All they need do is supply proposed track and route to the
agencies involved.

??? Who supplies information to whom? Are you saying the merchant ship
should provide some kind of sailing plan to some central agency? Sorry, no
central agency exists and until Homeland Sekurity takes over the planet,
there won't be one.

Oh Good Grief Rick... you are being argumentative for no reason... what
about the term "one way feed" don't you comprehend?
"This vessel is being routed to this track.... please advise any of your
fleet in the area that may cross the vessel's path as a safety
precaution"... and voila.. one way feed of info completed. Traffic has been
notified. Don't try and forward some delusional idea that if a vessel needs
to be found... someone can't find it... there is an information highway and
those that are good at managing the logistics involved... get well paid. I
can assure you that steps were taken by B&Q's team to advise all marine
interests of her route and progress.

CM

Capt. Mooron wrote:

Oh Good Grief Rick... you are being argumentative for no reason... what
about the term "one way feed" don't you comprehend?
"This vessel is being routed to this track.... please advise any of your
fleet in the area that may cross the vessel's path as a safety
precaution"... and voila.. one way feed of info completed. Traffic has been
notified.

And just why in Hell do you think any shipping company would take the
time and expense to tell some non-existent yachtie agency what track one
of their ships might be on ... or might not depending on weather and
commercial interests?

Or conversely, if you think a shipping company is going to spend time
and money to contact some yachtie group to find out if there are any
sailboats along their vessel's route you really are nuts.

Don't try and forward some delusional idea that if a vessel needs
to be found... someone can't find it... there is an information highway and
those that are good at managing the logistics involved... get well paid.

If you know what vessel it is it might be located. If you believe there
might be some ship, owned by someone, operated by somebody, in the
vicinity of some location at some time I would love to know how you
propose to find out what the phone number of that unknown ship is.

I can assure you that steps were taken by B&Q's team to advise all marine
interests of her route and progress.

And just how can you assure me of that? Did her team know "all marine
interests" the owners of every little one-ship company that might have
had a ship on the sea and did call each one every day to provide them
all with updates?

Do you really believe what you have written, or is this some bizarre troll?

Rick

Holy ****... are you just plain ****ing Dense???

Is there no depth to your abysmal idiocy???

Do you have comprehension problems with common English?

Try reading for content you ****in' retard!

I bet just changing socks is a major problem for you isn't it Ricky??

I'd explain it further.. but I'd need a friggin' blackboard and a ****in'
ruler to slap you with!

You not only shouldn't be allowed on a vessel... you shouldn't be allowed
out without a nurse!

Seriously... you put Horvath to shame on the Stupidometer!!

Now go on and **** the hell off... I don't have time to argue with a nut
case like you Dick Wad!

**** but your are STUPID!!!

CM

"Jetcap" wrote in message
...
Capt. Mooron wrote:

Oh Good Grief Rick... you are being argumentative for no reason... what
about the term "one way feed" don't you comprehend?
"This vessel is being routed to this track.... please advise any of your
fleet in the area that may cross the vessel's path as a safety
precaution"... and voila.. one way feed of info completed. Traffic has
been notified.

And just why in Hell do you think any shipping company would take the time
and expense to tell some non-existent yachtie agency what track one of
their ships might be on ... or might not depending on weather and
commercial interests?

Or conversely, if you think a shipping company is going to spend time and
money to contact some yachtie group to find out if there are any sailboats
along their vessel's route you really are nuts.

Don't try and forward some delusional idea that if a vessel needs to be
found... someone can't find it... there is an information highway and
those that are good at managing the logistics involved... get well paid.

If you know what vessel it is it might be located. If you believe there
might be some ship, owned by someone, operated by somebody, in the
vicinity of some location at some time I would love to know how you
propose to find out what the phone number of that unknown ship is.

I can assure you that steps were taken by B&Q's team to advise all marine
interests of her route and progress.

And just how can you assure me of that? Did her team know "all marine
interests" the owners of every little one-ship company that might have had
a ship on the sea and did call each one every day to provide them all with
updates?

Do you really believe what you have written, or is this some bizarre
troll?

Rick

"Jetcap" wrote in message
...
Scott Vernon wrote:
A bulk freighter berthed at the Philly Port had it's radar going,
at
least for the 2 hours I was there. Is there any reason for this?

Forgot it? Tuning it? Turned it on at "standby" and got delayed?


You think they read Neals' posts about constant watches?

Was there a bunch of guys rolling around on the deck laughing?

Nah, they were too busy emptying cedar buckets.

Scotty

Capt. Mooron wrote:
Holy ****...

You sound a bit tense ... maybe you need to learn how to articulate your
ideas better. Get back to me when you figure out what you were trying
to say.

Goodnight.

Rick

"Jetcap" wrote in message
...
Capt. Mooron wrote:
Holy ****...

You sound a bit tense ... maybe you need to learn how to articulate your
ideas better. Get back to me when you figure out what you were trying to
say.

Tense?? No.. mildly frustrated at your apparent incapacity to comprehend
basic english. Don't take it to heart...

It's obvious you managed to comprehend the the slurs and insults... that's a
good step... and now that you've been tuned in... if and when your reading
comprehension skills improve to a point that simple sentences become
comprehendable.... or that your reasoning skills can entertain primary
logic.... I'll be happy to enlighten you.

Goodnight.

Best scamper off to bed....

CM

Rick, that's the best he can do!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jetcap" wrote in message
...
Capt. Mooron wrote:
Holy ****...

You sound a bit tense ... maybe you need to learn how to articulate your
ideas better. Get back to me when you figure out what you were trying to
say.

Goodnight.

Rick