LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
John Cairns
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT-American Psycho

A fine example for American youth!

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/4160697/detail.html

John Cairns


  #2   Report Post  
John Cairns
 
Posts: n/a
Default


OzOne wrote in message ...
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:19:59 GMT, "John Cairns"
scribbled thusly:

A fine example for American youth!

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/4160697/detail.html

John Cairns

I just love this line

"He added, "You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women
around for five years because they didn't wear a veil," Mattis
continued. "You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway.
So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.


I think that by most modern psychiatric standards, this guy would be
classified as a psychopath.

John Cairns


  #3   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OzOne wrote...
I just love this line

"He added, "You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women
around for five years because they didn't wear a veil," Mattis
continued. "You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway.
So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."


Well, at least he shows some discrimination about his targets...

John Cairns wrote:
I think that by most modern psychiatric standards, this guy would be
classified as a psychopath.


Why? Because he thinks it's fun to shoot real-life bad guys, or because
he talked about it publicly? He's a Marine, for gosh sake! Although as a
general he probably doesn't get to do much shooting in person.

I used to hunt deer with a retired gunny sargent. Didn't talk much but
every once in while he'd say something to the effect that deer just
aren't smart enough, or well enough armed, to be good sport.

DSK

  #4   Report Post  
John Cairns
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message
...
Why? Because he thinks it's fun to shoot real-life bad guys, or because he
talked about it publicly? He's a Marine, for gosh sake! Although as a
general he probably doesn't get to do much shooting in person.

I used to hunt deer with a retired gunny sargent. Didn't talk much but
every once in while he'd say something to the effect that deer just aren't
smart enough, or well enough armed, to be good sport.

DSK


So, maybe psycho was an incorrect term.

"Browning puts considerable emphasis also on desensitization and
routinization of killing in explaining how men slowly escalated their
participation in killing. This is the psychology of commitment, much studied
in research on dissonance theory. In its modern version, dissonance is a
theory of rationalization in which individuals sucked into stupid or sleazy
behavior will change their opinions to justify and make sense of their
behavior. Probably the paradigm case of this psychology is another classic
study, Milgrams's research on obedience.

Milgram showed that the majority of normal individuals will give a supposed
"learner" increasing levels of shock, up to a maximum 450-volt shock labeled
"XXX DANGER STRONG SHOCK." Part of the power of this paradigm is the slow,
graded nature of the shocks, which begin at only 15 volts and increase 15
volts with every mistake the "learner" makes. So close is the grading of
shock levels that, at each level, to recognize something wrong with giving
the next level must imply something wrong with the level already
administered. Slow escalation of hurting others is a slippery slope in which
each act of aggression becomes a reason for more aggression.

Taken together, group dynamics and the psychology of escalating commitment
go a long way toward explaining how normal people can do awful things. Throw
in the reward and punishment power of the state, a power that needs move
only a small number of people to do the dirty work against a target class or
race, and even genocide begins to be comprehensible."

Can't find the attribution now, from a long article on the subject.

John Cairns


  #5   Report Post  
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default


John Cairns wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Why? Because he thinks it's fun to shoot real-life bad guys, or

because he
talked about it publicly? He's a Marine, for gosh sake! Although as

a
general he probably doesn't get to do much shooting in person.

I used to hunt deer with a retired gunny sargent. Didn't talk much

but
every once in while he'd say something to the effect that deer just

aren't
smart enough, or well enough armed, to be good sport.

DSK


So, maybe psycho was an incorrect term.

"Browning puts considerable emphasis also on desensitization and
routinization of killing in explaining how men slowly escalated their


participation in killing. This is the psychology of commitment, much

studied
in research on dissonance theory. In its modern version, dissonance

is a
theory of rationalization in which individuals sucked into stupid or

sleazy
behavior will change their opinions to justify and make sense of

their
behavior. Probably the paradigm case of this psychology is another

classic
study, Milgrams's research on obedience.

Milgram showed that the majority of normal individuals will give a

supposed
"learner" increasing levels of shock, up to a maximum 450-volt shock

labeled
"XXX DANGER STRONG SHOCK." Part of the power of this paradigm is the

slow,
graded nature of the shocks, which begin at only 15 volts and

increase 15
volts with every mistake the "learner" makes. So close is the grading

of
shock levels that, at each level, to recognize something wrong with

giving
the next level must imply something wrong with the level already
administered. Slow escalation of hurting others is a slippery slope

in which
each act of aggression becomes a reason for more aggression.

Taken together, group dynamics and the psychology of escalating

commitment
go a long way toward explaining how normal people can do awful

things. Throw
in the reward and punishment power of the state, a power that needs

move
only a small number of people to do the dirty work against a target

class or
race, and even genocide begins to be comprehensible."



First off that's General Physco. Got it....good

Second, his job is to kill them before they kill him or his troops. It
is called war.

Third, If you do not have fun at work, You need to find another career.

besides, he was just huffin and puffin in front of suppliers.

Joe





Can't find the attribution now, from a long article on the subject.

John Cairns




  #6   Report Post  
John Cairns
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
First off that's General Physco. Got it....good

Second, his job is to kill them before they kill him or his troops. It
is called war.

Third, If you do not have fun at work, You need to find another career.

besides, he was just huffin and puffin in front of suppliers.

Joe

Yeah, I was starting to think that myself. After all, the govt. spends
hundreds ofthousands to educate and train, and keep this guy, seems unlikely
they'd risk their investment so cavalierly. Bad choice of words, more
propaganda fodder for the "enemy".

John Cairns


  #7   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default




Sounds like he should retire and
become a divorce lawyer..

GaleB
  #8   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Cairns wrote:
So, maybe psycho was an incorrect term.

"... In its modern version, dissonance is a
theory of rationalization in which individuals sucked into stupid or sleazy
behavior will change their opinions to justify and make sense of their
behavior."


Hey, I didn't realize this thread was going to get into politics so quickly!


Milgram showed that the majority of normal individuals will give a supposed
"learner" increasing levels of shock, up to a maximum 450-volt shock labeled
"XXX DANGER STRONG SHOCK." Part of the power of this paradigm is the slow,
graded nature of the shocks, which begin at only 15 volts and increase 15
volts with every mistake the "learner" makes. So close is the grading of
shock levels that, at each level, to recognize something wrong with giving
the next level must imply something wrong with the level already
administered. Slow escalation of hurting others is a slippery slope in which
each act of aggression becomes a reason for more aggression.


Sure, especially with the added reinforcement of social approval for
aggressive or violent acts.


Taken together, group dynamics and the psychology of escalating commitment
go a long way toward explaining how normal people can do awful things.


That's how you take everyday suburban kids who probably love their
puppies and/or kittens etc etc, and turn them into combat infantrymen...
or concentration camp guards.

It's not particularly advanced psychology, it's more like common
sense... and it's been done since before Alexander the Great. In one
way, re-socialing people to do things they normally would not approve of
is "leadership."

The real issue here is not how to get normally-socialized people to kill
or otherwise brutalize each other, but to what purposes that training is
put.

... Throw
in the reward and punishment power of the state, a power that needs move
only a small number of people to do the dirty work against a target class or
race, and even genocide begins to be comprehensible."


Again, the real issue is the underlying moral justification for the
acts. You knew the U.S. Marine Corps purpose was to kill the enemy in
large numbers, right? That's why I say that Lt. Gen. Mattis is *not* a
psycho for his statements, but that he showed bad judgement in making
pretty blatant statements to an audience that does not share his
socialization for killing... a more important question to me is how
he... his fellow generals... and even more importantly, the civilians
who give the Pentagon it's instructions... decide who is to be "the enemy."

Can't find the attribution now, from a long article on the subject.


It's an interesting read, thanks for posting it.

Regards
Doug King

  #9   Report Post  
Capt. Mooron
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Heh.... all he said was ... and I quote...

According to an audio recording of Mattis' remarks, he said, "Actually,
it's a lot of fun to fight. You know, it's a hell of a hoot. ... It's fun
to shoot some people. I'll be right upfront with you, I like brawling."



He added, "You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for
five years because they didn't wear a veil," Mattis continued. "You know,
guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot
of fun to shoot them."


Do you think they should send someone more sensitive and in touch with their
feminine side?

CM

"John Cairns" wrote in message
. ..
A fine example for American youth!

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/4160697/detail.html

John Cairns



  #10   Report Post  
Vito
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Cairns" wrote in message
. ..
A fine example for American youth!

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/4160697/detail.html


I agree (he's a fine example) and see no reason anybody is upset by his
remarks. Most Taliban need killing. Too bad I'm too old to participate.
Why is killing them, or similar dangerous religious nuts, any different than
swatting a pesky fly or burning out a hornet nest.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM
This war is On-Topic, really, Part One, very long Gould 0738 General 0 September 27th 03 12:42 PM
Eastman's guide to exposing the 9-11 mass-murder frameup to justify world-domination to an otherwise isolationist American public Bertie the Bunyip ASA 4 August 23rd 03 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017