"This year will go down in history- for the first time, a civilized nation
has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient,
and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

ADOLPH HITLER, 1935



Way to go..... Eh?



CM

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:08:48 GMT, "Capt. Mooron"
scribbled thusly:

"This year will go down in history- for the first time, a civilized nation
has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient,
and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

ADOLPH HITLER, 1935



Way to go..... Eh?



CM

Dunno Mooron, do you have any statistics that show it didn't work?

Um, how would one know? Statistics were meaningless, once The War began.
But I suspect it was completely successful. Own a gun, get eliminated by
the Gestapo. Simple.

Oh wait--you weren't advocating that here, were you???


Max

"Maxprop" wrote in message news:tTyLd.4397

Um, how would one know? Statistics were meaningless, once The War began.
But I suspect it was completely successful. Own a gun, get eliminated by
the Gestapo. Simple.

I got the impression that the idea was that, if you proliferate guns amongst
the populace, they think they can take over the world...

Max,
The statement said; "The rest of the world will follow our lead"

WW2 is the statistic that proves the statement wrong as can be!

Ole Thom

Max & Oz,

Wrong again guys. The US Wild West with its "Six Gun Justice" was just
a short moment in history.

Two case and both point to the error of either extreme. Common sense an
sane judgement is really the answer. Guns aren't the problem. Human nut
cases are.

Ole Thom

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:08:09 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:

Um, how would one know? Statistics were meaningless, once The War began.
But I suspect it was completely successful. Own a gun, get eliminated by
the Gestapo. Simple.

Cool, so if you owned a gun the Govt would send someone around to sort
you out?

Oh wait--you weren't advocating that here, were you???

Maybe your fraidy cat police could learn from that.

Nah. I suspect Hitler had already followed Shakespeare's advice and killed
all the lawyers. Our "fraidy cat police" aren't afraid of perps, only
attorneys and liberal, activist judges.

Max

"Wally" wrote in message

"Maxprop" wrote in message news:tTyLd.4397

Um, how would one know? Statistics were meaningless, once The War began.
But I suspect it was completely successful. Own a gun, get eliminated by
the Gestapo. Simple.

I got the impression that the idea was that, if you proliferate guns
amongst
the populace, they think they can take over the world...

My understanding was the Nazi regime disarmed the public in order to prevent
an uprising and potential overthrow of the National Socialist gov't. Which
is probably what the founders of our Constitution had in the backs of their
minds when they penned the Second Amendment.

Max

OzOne wrote in message

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:50:52 -0800, (Thom Stewart)
scribbled thusly:

. Guns aren't the problem. Human nut
cases are.

Ole Thom

Then take away their access to guns.

Some of them have shown a preference for high-nitrate fertilizer and fuel
oil, rather than guns.

Max

"Donal" wrote in message


ADOLPH HITLER, 1935

What's your point? Are you suggesting that Hitler got nothing at all
right?

What about the economic successes ... the Autobahns ... the railways ...
the Space Race?

Some of us find it difficult to give the guy credit for anything positive in
light of the fact that he attempted to annihilate an entire ethnic
culture/race of people.

Max

Oz,

They hijack airliner using box knifes because the access to gun was
denied

Ole Thom


http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage