LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So lemme understand this: Someone tells the truth and Fox says he's
"losing his mind". Does that about sum it up?

  #2   Report Post  
Bart Senior
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The poor man has lost his market share and then
his mind.

Here is your proof:

Note the specific refernence questioning the rationality of the other
networks.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/vie...&program=Misc&
id=2226

FoxNews: 54.2 percent;
CNN: 29.2 percent;
CNN Headline News: 8.5 percent;
MSNBC: 8.1 percent. "Never before has MSNBC [placed] fourth."

http://www.ravnwood.com/archives/001556.shtml

http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/...hp/t-6093.html

TV news: blind to market? - The Washington Times: Commentary ...
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/...4112-6280r.htm

For years, surveys have shown the country has more
conservatives than liberals, and there are almost an even
number of Republican and Democrat voters.

Does it make economic sense to have four left-leaning
(five if you count MSNBC separate from NBC) TV news
organizations, and only one right-leaning?

People go to FOX, not because it's perfect, it's not, but
because the rest of the news is strongly liberaly bias. If
you are intelligent, you vote with your feet and seek news
from the most reliable source. In the US it's FOX News
and the Wall Street Journal.

Bart

"Frank" wrote in message
oups.com...
So lemme understand this: Someone tells the truth and Fox says he's
"losing his mind". Does that about sum it up?



  #3   Report Post  
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Bart Senior wrote:
....snip...
Does it make economic sense to have four left-leaning
(five if you count MSNBC separate from NBC) TV news
organizations, and only one right-leaning?


I dunno about economics. It's ok with me if we have any number of
honest news stations. Over and above that, if you wackos want to have a
right-wing propaganda organ, go ahead. Just don't pretend that it's
"news" or that it's "fair and balanced." Fox makes Pravda look like a
bastion of responsible journalism.

People go to FOX, not because it's perfect, it's not, but
because the rest of the news is strongly liberaly bias....snip...


People go to Fox for the same reason that working class people vote
Republican: they're stupid or they're fanatical ideologues.

You can tell this Big Lie (liberal bias) as often as you want; but the
reality is that most news organizations try to be honest and fair. Fox
sells propaganda and outright lies and calls itself "fair" when it is
anything but. It is a propaganda organ. The others are news
organizations. There's a difference.


Frank

  #4   Report Post  
Bart Senior
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the laugh. Of course you dont' realy believe all that.

"Frank" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bart Senior wrote:
...snip...
Does it make economic sense to have four left-leaning
(five if you count MSNBC separate from NBC) TV news
organizations, and only one right-leaning?


I dunno about economics. It's ok with me if we have any number of
honest news stations. Over and above that, if you wackos want to have a
right-wing propaganda organ, go ahead. Just don't pretend that it's
"news" or that it's "fair and balanced." Fox makes Pravda look like a
bastion of responsible journalism.

People go to FOX, not because it's perfect, it's not, but
because the rest of the news is strongly liberaly bias....snip...


People go to Fox for the same reason that working class people vote
Republican: they're stupid or they're fanatical ideologues.

You can tell this Big Lie (liberal bias) as often as you want; but the
reality is that most news organizations try to be honest and fair. Fox
sells propaganda and outright lies and calls itself "fair" when it is
anything but. It is a propaganda organ. The others are news
organizations. There's a difference.


Frank



  #5   Report Post  
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Bart Senior wrote:
Thanks for the laugh. Of course you dont' realy believe all that.


Au contraire, mon vieux.

What amazes me is that you can post that you have "proof" of something
provided by Drudge, Huffington, and the Cato Institute; but you'd
obviously scorn someone who'd riposte with Michael Moore, Al Franken,
and an opinion piece from the American Communist Workers' Party.

And you'd fail to see the irony of your position. Amazing. Mais jamais
de ma vie!



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Along with Chuck's story, here's another one where things went wrong... Wilko General 3 June 9th 04 01:48 PM
OT - Where is the lie? (especially for jcs) jps General 33 July 28th 03 12:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017