| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doug,
I'm not one to put down people for having trawlers..i think they're nice and have their place...but i can't imagine just taking the trawler out for an afternoon spin...noisy....just not my thing... "DSK" wrote in message ... Well duh...who can afford all that diesel? Maxprop wrote: A single engine trawler, such as a Nordhavn 43 running at 8 kts., is relatively economical to operate compared with, say, a semi-displacement trawler, such as a Grand Banks 42 with twin 3208 Cats running at 14kts. Then again I buy roughly $40 of diesel per annum. Well, if you doubled... or quadrupled... that, would it be a major expense factor? You'd have to cruise at least half time or more (depending on the boat, I don't think of Nordhavens as particularly fuel-efficient) to spend on fuel what you already spend on insurance and taxes. Add in a full-time slip, and fuel becomes almost trivial. I can tell you this- for what sails & running rigging cost, I can cruise a long long way in our trawler. We've spent approx $150 on fuel this year, making 2 cruises of 300+ miles plus going out almost every weekend, and we've still got more than 1/2 full tanks... which is good, because now we're running the heater almost full time... Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is because you are a discerning woman who appreciates the finer
things in life. A noisy smelly diesel engine on a slow boat is not one of them eh? Cheers katysails wrote: Doug, I'm not one to put down people for having trawlers..i think they're nice and have their place...but i can't imagine just taking the trawler out for an afternoon spin...noisy....just not my thing... "DSK" wrote in message ... Well duh...who can afford all that diesel? Maxprop wrote: A single engine trawler, such as a Nordhavn 43 running at 8 kts., is relatively economical to operate compared with, say, a semi-displacement trawler, such as a Grand Banks 42 with twin 3208 Cats running at 14kts. Then again I buy roughly $40 of diesel per annum. Well, if you doubled... or quadrupled... that, would it be a major expense factor? You'd have to cruise at least half time or more (depending on the boat, I don't think of Nordhavens as particularly fuel-efficient) to spend on fuel what you already spend on insurance and taxes. Add in a full-time slip, and fuel becomes almost trivial. I can tell you this- for what sails & running rigging cost, I can cruise a long long way in our trawler. We've spent approx $150 on fuel this year, making 2 cruises of 300+ miles plus going out almost every weekend, and we've still got more than 1/2 full tanks... which is good, because now we're running the heater almost full time... Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like I said, I'm not going to run down anyone;'s boat...I know people who
have chartered trawler's and had a great time, but it'sust not for me. I'm always quite thankful when we make iot throught he channel to lake Michigan and can turn the blasted thing off.... "Nav" wrote in message ... That is because you are a discerning woman who appreciates the finer things in life. A noisy smelly diesel engine on a slow boat is not one of them eh? Cheers katysails wrote: Doug, I'm not one to put down people for having trawlers..i think they're nice and have their place...but i can't imagine just taking the trawler out for an afternoon spin...noisy....just not my thing... "DSK" wrote in message ... Well duh...who can afford all that diesel? Maxprop wrote: A single engine trawler, such as a Nordhavn 43 running at 8 kts., is relatively economical to operate compared with, say, a semi-displacement trawler, such as a Grand Banks 42 with twin 3208 Cats running at 14kts. Then again I buy roughly $40 of diesel per annum. Well, if you doubled... or quadrupled... that, would it be a major expense factor? You'd have to cruise at least half time or more (depending on the boat, I don't think of Nordhavens as particularly fuel-efficient) to spend on fuel what you already spend on insurance and taxes. Add in a full-time slip, and fuel becomes almost trivial. I can tell you this- for what sails & running rigging cost, I can cruise a long long way in our trawler. We've spent approx $150 on fuel this year, making 2 cruises of 300+ miles plus going out almost every weekend, and we've still got more than 1/2 full tanks... which is good, because now we're running the heater almost full time... Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nav" wrote in message That is because you are a discerning woman who appreciates the finer things in life. A noisy smelly diesel engine on a slow boat is not one of them eh? I find trawlers to be a bit boring for weekend outings. But just about the most fun I've ever had on one was skippering a CWB 35 with twin Lehmans from Pen****er to White Lake (about 35nm) in a nor'wester of 30-45kts. with quartering waves of 8-10'. What a ride. It took a lot of concentration to keep the damn boat on course, but it was a blast. Never doubted the ability of the vessel to handle those conditions for a moment. Several of the passengers lost their breakfast, however. Max |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
katysails wrote:
Doug, I'm not one to put down people for having trawlers..i think they're nice and have their place...but i can't imagine just taking the trawler out for an afternoon spin...noisy....just not my thing... It's not noisy, the engine room is very well insulated. At our normal running speed, you can tell it's running, but you can also hear a whisper. Throttling up increases the volume obviously, but it's also wasteful as it primarily makes more wake. The boat will only go about 8 1/4 which is hardly thrilling, so why push it. It's fun but it's a different kind of fun than sailing. We enjoy exploring creeks & lagoons that sailboats can't get into. We also enjoy going out on cold and/or rainy days when sailing is miserable but the river is still there to be enjoyed. The upper deck gives a perspective that you don't see from the deck of a sailboat. Inside the pilothouse you can see wildlife but they can't see you and it seems the boat itself doesn't threaten them as much. I have enjoyed tugboating more than I thought I would, it has been a hoot cruising and just riding around. I need to seek the mental adjustment for enjoyment of working on it, though. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
So you enjoy that wildlife which you proceed to pollute out of
existence? You, sir, are totally selfish and irresponsible with your pollution machine. You disgust me. CN "DSK" wrote in message ... katysails wrote: Doug, I'm not one to put down people for having trawlers..i think they're nice and have their place...but i can't imagine just taking the trawler out for an afternoon spin...noisy....just not my thing... It's not noisy, the engine room is very well insulated. At our normal running speed, you can tell it's running, but you can also hear a whisper. Throttling up increases the volume obviously, but it's also wasteful as it primarily makes more wake. The boat will only go about 8 1/4 which is hardly thrilling, so why push it. It's fun but it's a different kind of fun than sailing. We enjoy exploring creeks & lagoons that sailboats can't get into. We also enjoy going out on cold and/or rainy days when sailing is miserable but the river is still there to be enjoyed. The upper deck gives a perspective that you don't see from the deck of a sailboat. Inside the pilothouse you can see wildlife but they can't see you and it seems the boat itself doesn't threaten them as much. I have enjoyed tugboating more than I thought I would, it has been a hoot cruising and just riding around. I need to seek the mental adjustment for enjoyment of working on it, though. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |