Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:36:45 -0500, "Vito" said: Police believe it perfectly legitimate to violate your rights so long as they don't need your "confession" to convict - ie if they can find enough other evidence based on your "confession" or their illegal search they're home free. Wrong on the law again. Ever heard of "fruit of the poisoned tree?" Oy! (look to heaven) Did I mention the law at all? I took several college courses in criminal justice. Most of my classmates were working LEOs. To a man, they believed it was OK for them to violate your rights. The only deterrent was that evidence obtained thereby would be tossed out. That belief hurt them on tests but they still believed it .... kind of like some folks on the NG (c: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA | |||
It's only the liberals hating. | ASA |