"Dave" wrote in message

Well, Mrs. Kerry says she's "African-American."

She was born in Africa??

CM

Now that's what I call an inferiority complex.

Cheers

Overproof wrote:

No... you can call me Capt. Mooron... like everyone else. I'm 100%
thoroughbred Belgian! I'm proud of that fact and my global history only adds
to make me much greater than the sum of my parts.

Capt. Mooron.... Spawned in the Hot, Humid Jungle of the African Congo.....
Forged in the Rugged North Atlantic.... and Tempered by the Cold Arctic
Ice!!

You only wish you were this good!..... :-D

CM

"DSK" wrote ...
Please explain how DNA testing can identify the consanguinity between
people who lived 3,000 years ago, when the identity of the people tested
is an open question.


Vito wrote:
Simple. According to legend Moishe's people came from near what's now
Baghdad via Egypt, killed all of the indigineous peoples in the
"promised
land" and replaced them. Were that true there would be DNA evidence
that
one gene pool had been replaced by another. Just the opposite is true.

You've ignored the basic barrier to answering the question.

How do you know the identities of the people you're getting the DNA from
after 3,000 years?

I'm sorry, I misunderstood your question. They don't test people who lived
3000 years ago. They test a statistically sound number of people who's
ancestors have lived in and around Palistine for many generations. If the
Moses myth were true we'd find that people who descended from Moses'
invaders were in a different gene pool than those from areas that were not
invaded and that this pool would resemble those from Baghdad and/or Egypt.
That's not what was found. Instead the researchers, Israelis BTW, found no
statistical evidence that one gene pool replace another IAW the 5th book.
So, if Moses ever existed, and there is scant evidence either way, then his
followers were few and were simply absorbed into the area's indigineous gene
pool.


BTW in ancient warfare it was extremely uncommon to kill all the
defeated people. Where do you think slave girls & concubines came from?

But in this case God told them to kill off the locals. But DNA says they
didn't so the Moses myth is wrong on that score.



I had no intent of covering all of history in this forum

Do you have any intention of discussing history?

... nor debating
whether 50% or 49% or 1% of Jews escaped the Diaspora, especially with
anyone who "knows" that only Jews lived in Roman Judea but doesn't
understand genetic research

!!!

You know all about it, you saw it on TV!

Well actually no, I have a DD and try to keep up with discoveries, but
recent Discovery and History Channel essays are pretty factual and easily
researched.


religious beliefs cannot be challenged with truth. I made the simple
statement that Jews driven from Judea 2000 years ago had become ethnic
and
cultural Europeans

Somewhat, sure. But they were enough different from Christian Europeans
to be expelled and to suffer pogroms.

There you go disembling again. That's true, but Euro-Jews were and are more
similar to other Euros than they are to Jews from , say, Ethiopia.

... and that European Jews immigrated into Palestine after
ww2 to establish a Jewish state

Slightly true but ignores 90% of what really happened to establish Israel.

No, it's entirely true. There'd be no Israel were it not for that influx of
Euro culture. 90%? More like 99.9% because it isn't relevent to whether or
not Euro (and other) Jews have a right to Palistine. I mean, like Golda was
from Milwaukee IIRC but so what?


... and displace the indigenous residents.

That doesn't seem to have been the Jews intention in 1947 and '48. What
really happened is that the Arabs rejected the partition, wanted *all*
the land and all Jewish property, and plotted to kill the Jews once the
British Army left them alone. Instead they got a big surprise and have
been crying "no fair, do over!" ever since.

Which Jews' intention? Most? Prolly not? Some? For sure. Remember Sharon
defiling the mosque to derail the last peace plan? Radicals like the Lukid
party want to gather all Jews to Israel and there's not enough room unless
the Palistinians go away - as in to Allah.

What really happened? Arabs' plot got shafted by individual Brit soldiers
and non-coms (Source: Brit soldiers and non-coms). As Alfie put it, air you
are facing a boatload of refuges, people just like yourself, and you're told
to send them back to sea to protect a bunch of rag heads who wear skirts so
they can **** in the street! Sure, and me eyesight failed to notice anyone
disembarking. And when we were told to give up our weapons and ammo to the
same ragheads so they could slaughter these people we did even tho many were
"stolen" by the immigrants first if ye get me drift. Nor did we toss
grenades into any courtyards full of Arabs - we handed them over as nice as
you'd please! That's me story and I'm stickin too it! Even with 1000s of
Alfies to was touch and go and the Jews might have lost were it not for
"atoomic bombs" Try Michners(sp?) "The Source" for some insights into that.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:16:05 -0500, "Vito" said:

Until the halocost, Euro Jews had as little interest
in moving to Palistine as US Jews do today -

I don't understand what you're saying here. Are you saying that US Jews
today do or do not have an interest in moving to Israel?

None of my friends ever considered it despite some lucrative offers to
retiring military - especially Old Crows. They say "It's a nice place to
visit but ....."

they had their own rich
comfortable Euro-Jewish culture, even their own language (Yiddish).

I'd suggest a trip to Eastern Europe before making a call about
"comfortable.". Visit the ghettos of Prague and Krakow, and investigate
some
of the rural areas of Poland and the Ukraine.

"Comfortable" is relative. Many Euros stayed home rather than come to
America. These places seemed better than the alternative until Nazis and
Commies came along.

BTW, Yiddish is just one of two languages of European Jewry. (But of
course
you knew that.) Ladino has its own rich heritage.

Yes, thanks for reminding me.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0798/ladino1.asp

Dave,

How about 600 years of Ottoman occupation of the Middle East. That sure
as hell screwed up boundaries. Enough so that the British, at the Hague,
could draw up new boundaries to split up oil bearing nations. National
boundaries weren't as important as influence by the 10% ers after WW1,
when Petroleum became important.

Ole Thom

How do you know the identities of the people you're getting the DNA from
after 3,000 years?


Vito wrote:
I'm sorry, I misunderstood your question. They don't test people who lived
3000 years ago. They test a statistically sound number of people who's
ancestors have lived in and around Palistine for many generations.

Uh huh. And we assign scientific accuracy to peoples' stating "Yes, my
ancestors have lived in this area for many generations."

Phooey! My ancestors have lived in the U.S. since before it was the U.S.
and guess what... doesn't change the *fact* that we grabbed it from the
Indians!


.... If the
Moses myth were true we'd find that people who descended from Moses'
invaders were in a different gene pool than those from areas that were not
invaded and that this pool would resemble those from Baghdad and/or Egypt.

After 3,000 years? Your knowledge of genetics needs a little brushing up.



That's not what was found. Instead the researchers, Israelis BTW, found no
statistical evidence that one gene pool replace another IAW the 5th book.
So, if Moses ever existed, and there is scant evidence either way, then his
followers were few and were simply absorbed into the area's indigineous gene
pool.

It sounds to me like this TV show you're quoting has a bit of an agenda,
and has skipped over quite a lot of scientific vertity trying to "prove"
the point. Without testing DNA from archeological forensics (and then
the question becomes one of "who is really in that particular grave")
there is no basis for comparing modern populations with ancient groups.




BTW in ancient warfare it was extremely uncommon to kill all the
defeated people. Where do you think slave girls & concubines came from?


But in this case God told them to kill off the locals. But DNA says they
didn't so the Moses myth is wrong on that score.

I think your Moses myth is as garbled as your genetics... Moses directed
his warriors, when victorious, to dash out the enemies babies brains on
the rocks... grisly enough but hardly evidence they attempted
genocide... which is never 100% successful anyway, and they would have
kept women slaves also... which would lead to genetic mixing, oh no!


Well actually no, I have a DD and try to keep up with discoveries, but
recent Discovery and History Channel essays are pretty factual and easily
researched.

If so, then you are massively misunderstanding the basics of DNA
fingerprinting. I suspect that you are freely interpreting part of
whatever it is they said.


... But they were enough different from Christian Europeans
to be expelled and to suffer pogroms.


There you go disembling again.

Oh right. The pogroms are just a minor little unimportant side issue...
unless you get caught in one..

...That's true, but Euro-Jews were and are more
similar to other Euros than they are to Jews from , say, Ethiopia.

.....meaning what?

Are you trying to claim that only 100% simon-pure Semites should be
allowed any claim whatever to land in Israel?


... and that European Jews immigrated into Palestine after
ww2 to establish a Jewish state

Slightly true but ignores 90% of what really happened to establish Israel.


No, it's entirely true. There'd be no Israel were it not for that influx of
Euro culture.

???
???

Did you just get home from a hell of a party?


.... Remember Sharon
defiling the mosque to derail the last peace plan?

Horse hockey. The ongoing intifada was planned & scheduled before Sharon
visited the Temple Mount, which hardly qualifies as "defiling" a mosque.




What really happened?

You don't don't know, do you?

You seem to consistantly take the most extreme pro-Palestinian slant,
what's up with that?

.... Arabs' plot got shafted by individual Brit soldiers
and non-coms (Source: Brit soldiers and non-coms). As Alfie put it, air you
are facing a boatload of refuges, people just like yourself, and you're told
to send them back to sea to protect a bunch of rag heads who wear skirts so
they can **** in the street! Sure, and me eyesight failed to notice anyone
disembarking. And when we were told to give up our weapons and ammo to the
same ragheads so they could slaughter these people we did even tho many were
"stolen" by the immigrants first if ye get me drift. Nor did we toss
grenades into any courtyards full of Arabs - we handed them over as nice as
you'd please! That's me story and I'm stickin too it! Even with 1000s of
Alfies to was touch and go and the Jews might have lost were it not for
"atoomic bombs" Try Michners(sp?) "The Source" for some insights into that.


Are you saying that the British gave direct military assistance to the Jews?

You really have no clue, apparently you think any wild fiction you can
invent should be given credibility. And go re-read 'The Source' because
what you've said bears no semblance whatever to the book... nor to reality.

DSK

DSK wrote:



I think your Moses myth is as garbled as your genetics... Moses directed
his warriors, when victorious, to dash out the enemies babies brains on
the rocks... grisly enough but hardly evidence they attempted
genocide... which is never 100% successful anyway,

There have been a few cases of true genocide in history. But really, the
point is that you do not need to kill very last man woman and child to
accomplish genocide. You simply have to kill so many that their cultural
and social (and genetic) identity is lost.

Cheers

Nav wrote:
There have been a few cases of true genocide in history.

Yep. Some on purpose, some accidental...


... But really, the
point is that you do not need to kill very last man woman and child to
accomplish genocide. You simply have to kill so many that their cultural
and social (and genetic) identity is lost.

Agreed again... although with DNA fingerprinting, the genetic identity
would take many many generations to be truly lost.

DSK

In article ,
Joe wrote:
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
Thom, take you're comments elsewhere. The only idiot I see in this tread is
the ancient geezer who has stopped thinking rationally.

--

Thats because your the idiot Jon,

Ol Thom voted as a democrat most likely to party loyality that led way
back to years when the Democratic party has some decent leaders. He
has an excuse.

You and your type have so soiled the democrat party that Ol Thom kinda
feels like he should have taken a better look at todays Democrats....
I'm guessing.

You on the other hand show clearly just how far off track the
democraps have de-railed. People like Ol Tom are your only chance to
ever get back to a party that will have an ounce of respect.

And any commet Ol Thom makes will be seen by all as a 1000 times more
crediable than your comments and ability to gay up everything.

Joe

Interesting that you have decided to mention gays, whereas no one else
in this thread did. I wonder what that says about you.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

but yr g(50)-grandmother lived there.
Scout

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
I've never been there.

Scotty

"Scout" wrote in message
...
we'd all have to go back to Africa
Scout

"katysails" wrote in message
...
So if everyone is from somewhere else, and we all go back to where
we came
from, would the world be any better?
Or any different?

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"DSK" wrote
Donal wrote:
Quite correct, Neal! Especially in Australia - where the
land has
all
been
stolen from the (ab)original owners.

Same in America... including South America. Same in much of
Europe too,
especially those islands sticking out at the top.

And in Israel .... and the theft is still proceding.