"Joe" wrote in message
. ..
"Donal" wrote in message
...
OzOne wrote in message
...


(2) The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for."

Oz,
The Geneva Convention was not intended to protect non-Americans.



Hey you non-American losers,

The Geneva convention was not intended to protect terrorist.

The purpose of the Geneva convention was to protect innocent civilians
by distingushing clearly between combatants and non-combatants.

How do you distinguish between combatants and non-combatants when you are
dropping bombs onto a residential area?





This is why the convention requires soldiers to wear uniforms that
distinquish them from the civilain population.

The insurgent terrorist fighting from inside the mosque did not wear
distinctive signs, insignias, symbols or uniforms. They were just
plain out murdering thugs who deserve what they got.

Nobody is worrying about the insurgent terrorists. In fact, we are
applauding the deaths of terrorists.

We are worried that killing young children creates more terrorists. I
suspect that you get 10 new terrorists for every innocent civilian killed.
If the innocent civilian is under 10 years old, then you probably get 100
new terrorists.



regards


Donal
--

Oz,
Have you ever fired up close to an enemy?

What the hell kind of a stupid question was that? Does a Sonar operator
on a Sub ever get a chance to even see the enemy he locates, does a Helo
Gunner ever see the enemy up close, does a driver of a Bradley ever get
to see the ******* Suicide Bomber that kills him.

What the hell kind of war do you think they are fighting over there?

If they didn't hide in Mosque, shooting at them they wouldn't have the
fight them out. If they didn't hide with dead bodies they wouldn't have
to be shot at when they move, by a solder that was shot in the face just
the day before.

Get real; Realist. Open your eyes and mind.

Ole Thom
****, I give up Oz. It has truly sunk in that you DON'T WANT TO
UNDERSTAND.
I won't try anymore.

In article , Donal
wrote:

"Joe" wrote in message
. ..
"Donal" wrote in message
...
OzOne wrote in message
...


(2) The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for."

Oz,
The Geneva Convention was not intended to protect non-Americans.



Hey you non-American losers,

The Geneva convention was not intended to protect terrorist.

The purpose of the Geneva convention was to protect innocent civilians
by distingushing clearly between combatants and non-combatants.

How do you distinguish between combatants and non-combatants when you are
dropping bombs onto a residential area?

Same way the British & Germans did in WW2. Or the Irish.........

PDW

Forget it, Thom. Oz is clueless. He's never heard of survival of the
fittest. He'd rather side with a terrorist than with a patriot. He is a
pathetic mental midget worthy of nothing but scorn.

CN

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ...
Oz,
Have you ever fired up close to an enemy?

What the hell kind of a stupid question was that? Does a Sonar operator
on a Sub ever get a chance to even see the enemy he locates, does a Helo
Gunner ever see the enemy up close, does a driver of a Bradley ever get
to see the ******* Suicide Bomber that kills him.

What the hell kind of war do you think they are fighting over there?

If they didn't hide in Mosque, shooting at them they wouldn't have the
fight them out. If they didn't hide with dead bodies they wouldn't have
to be shot at when they move, by a solder that was shot in the face just
the day before.

Get real; Realist. Open your eyes and mind.

Ole Thom
****, I give up Oz. It has truly sunk in that you DON'T WANT TO
UNDERSTAND.
I won't try anymore.

In article ,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Capt._Neal=AE?= wrote:
Forget it, Thom. Oz is clueless. He's never heard of survival of the
fittest. He'd rather side with a terrorist than with a patriot. He is a
pathetic mental midget worthy of nothing but scorn.

CN

Thom, you should listen to Neal. He knows a lot about being a mental
midget.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

"Donal" wrote in message ...

We are worried that killing young children creates more terrorists. I
suspect that you get 10 new terrorists for every innocent civilian killed.
If the innocent civilian is under 10 years old, then you probably get 100
new terrorists.

Every war has collateral damage. So what. We go out of our way
to minimize it.

So what if 100 new terrorists are created? They will serve a good purpose
and will give our brave soldiers something to destroy. I'd say the odds are
pretty bad for the terrorists so far. We lost a couple dozen fighting men
(may these heroes rest in peace) while the terrorist rabble lost thousands
(may they rot in Hell with the rest of the swine).

Remember, peace only comes about after the utter and total defeat of
the enemy. I could care less if we wiped out millions of terrorist. It
is our sacred duty If I weren't so darned old I'd be doing the shooting
myself.

To quote the worthy Democrat presidential candidate. "Bring it on!"

To quote our beloved President. "Let's roll!"

To quote the typical liberal, pacifist weenie, "Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, MaaaaMa".

CN

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:41:13 -0000, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


How do you distinguish between combatants and non-combatants when you are
dropping bombs onto a residential area?


That's easy. The combatants are shooting at you.

Remember, when shooting at running civilians, don't lead them too
much.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

"Donal" wrote in message

How do you distinguish between combatants and non-combatants when you are
dropping bombs onto a residential area?

You must have been a real fan of WWII.

Max

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message

In article , Donal vomited:


How do you distinguish between combatants and non-combatants when you
are
dropping bombs onto a residential area?

Same way the British & Germans did in WW2. Or the Irish.........

In short, they didn't. No one ever claimed war was neat or pretty.

Max

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:19:26 +1100, OzOne wrote this crap:

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:06:35 -0500, Horvath
scribbled thusly:

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:41:13 -0000, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


How do you distinguish between combatants and non-combatants when you are
dropping bombs onto a residential area?


That's easy. The combatants are shooting at you.

Remember, when shooting at running civilians, don't lead them too
much.

But be careful here, the unarmed ones run just a little faster.


There's no need to lead them when you're shooting them in the back.
Just ask John Kerry.






Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!