| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave" wrote in message On 9 Nov 2004 14:51:06 -0800, (Jonathan Ganz) said: Considerably. It shows almost conclusively that people in the blue states are more likely to have had their kid take a prep course for the SATs or ACTs. Is that a bad thing? Seems pretty smart to me... Jon, must I draw you a picture of everything? The point is that the underlying assumption of the presentation--that SAT scores can be used to predict likely scores on an IQ test-- is flawed. Not only flawed, but denied vehemently by the psychometrists that design such tests. They've even admitted, in recent years, that such exams might be socio-economically biased as well. So much for the this gem of a theory. Max |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .net,
Maxprop wrote: Not only flawed, but denied vehemently by the psychometrists that design such tests. They've even admitted, in recent years, that such exams might be socio-economically biased as well. So much for the this gem of a theory. And, you have a reading comprehension problem. Not my fault. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |