| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now I see why you don't follow my point.
The centrifigal force is m1m2/r^2 _only) along the orbital path (which passes through the center of mass of course). But the diameter of the earth puts the water well away from the center of mass so that the gravitational force at the planet surface is _not_ balanced by the centrifugal force (except at two points on the surface). Near the moon, the centrifigal force is less than gravity to water gets pulled there. On the outside of the system, centrifugal force is greater than the gravitational force so water tries to move outwards. I hope you can see my point now. Cheers Jeff Morris wrote: Nav - The two forces you are talking about are exactly the same. The centrifugal force IS =m1m2/r^2. They are NOT two different forces. The centrifugal force is the fictional force that is exactly opposite the real force (as viewed from a non-accelerating system). Even if you calculate from a centrifugal force point of view, you end up deriving the angular velocity in terms of F=m1m2/r^2. For anyone who wants to follow this through, here's a pretty complete version. http://www.clupeid.demon.co.uk/tides/maths.html The approach is to take the force the Moon's pull exerts on individual parts of the Earth, then to add in the centrifugal force and the Earth's pull and the Earth's daily rotation component. However, the centrifugal force is derived from the total gravitation pull, so that component is certainly not ignored. As is often the case, it gets messy before terms start to cancel, but the end result is that the "differential gravity" is exactly symmetrical on the near and far side from the Moon. It would not be fair to say the the near side component is caused by one force, and the far side by another. In fact, all of the "latitude dependent" forces are caused by the differential pull from the Moon. It is when you subtract out the net pull (or add the centrifugal) that this becomes symmetrical on both sides. "Nav" wrote in message ... Let me try to be clear. A gravity only argument is usually based on the equation F=m1m2/r^2. This is a monotonic field function so that water would only ever flow toward the point closest to the center of mass of the system (note that the water's potential energy is proportional to F(r).r). It cannot create two tidal bulges for that requires two potential energy minima. Now couple that equation with F=mr omega^2 and you get the local force on a mass of water (mw) as mw.ms/r^2 - mw r omega^2 where ms is the system mass and r the distance to the center of mass. Now the potential energy of water has a new local minima away from the center of mass (plot 1/r + r^2 ; r 0). This gives the tidal bulge on the far side of the planet. This is only a local minimum, so that if the earth did not constantly move water to it by it's own rotation that bulge would gradually disappear. If you like, water gets stuck at the far side local minumum as the earth rotates. So, as I see it, without explictly including the rotation(s) you don't get two tides -OK? Cheers Jeff Morris wrote: but the only way the system wouldn't rotate is if there was no gravity, so I'm not sure what your point is. "Nav" wrote in message ... I think if the earth moon-earth system were not rotating there would be one tide. Gavity pulls all objects toward the center of mass. So without rotation the water would be deepest near the moon. Cheers Scout wrote: I was hoping you could solve this riddle. But I'll toss in my oversimplified guess: the moon's gravity attracts the water closest to it resulting in high high tide on the moon side of earth, and also pulls the earth away from the water on the far side, resulting in a low high tide on the side farthest from the moon. Scout "Nav" wrote in message ... Yes, so... Cheers Scout wrote: If the center of mass was the only factor involved, wouldn't the bulge be on one side of the earth only? Scout "Nav" wrote in message ... Yes, you can. Where is the center of mass of the earth moon system? Cheers Peter S/Y Anicula wrote: We can certainly look at the gravitational force from the moon and the gravitational force of the earth seperatly, and then ad the two, to have a look at the combined forces. Peter S/Y Anicula "Nav" skrev i en meddelelse ... Well Peter, I have to disagree there. The gravitational force acts only toward the center of mass of the system. This cannot by itself produce two bulges. To clarify this, try imagining the forces of gravity in 2D on a piece of paper. In all cases, water would be pulled toward the center of the Earth-Moon pair. This would lead to less water on the far side and more water as you move toward the moon... -two bulges would not be present. Cheers |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Riding the Tide | ASA | |||
| [ANN] Tide Tool Freeware for Palm OS Updated | General | |||
| [ANN] Tide Tool Freeware for Palm OS Updated | Cruising | |||
| [ANN] Freeware Tide Program for Palm OS Updated | UK Power Boats | |||