| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bart Senior" wrote
[snip] My friend Fred was amazed at how high the Etchells can point. I said wait a second, sheeted the jib in tighter and told him to try again. He was more than amazed, we cracked off again and laid it right out the channel like a rocket. Any other boat would have had to take a couple of hitches. We did it in one tack with room to spare if we needed to head up. If you haven't sailed an Etchells, you don't know how high a boat can point. I haven't. How high would you say she can point? I didn't bring my GPS, but I'd bet we averaged 6 knots blasting across the Sound to Port Jeff. I need 15-20 mph breezes to do that in my Starwind. I'm not one to hold my water. I used the bucket to pee once on the way across, when we were heeled sharply. Later on the way back, when the wind died I peed off the back. Halfway across I noticed one of the ladies had a very wet bottom after everyone else's bottom had dried off. The poor gal was too embarrassed to use the bucket and pee'd in her pants. She never complained, so Fred and I pretended not to notice. That's a lot of peeing going on. Maybe her pants weren't designed to dry quickly? It was her first time sailing. Maybe next time, she think about using the bucket rather than have a wet butt for 6 hours. Depends. Question: What is faster a Mac 26 with a 30 HP outboard or an Etchells close reaching in 10-12 knots of breeze? The Mac couldn't even manage 6 knots with a 30 HP ob and a 12 knot headwind? My Starwind can do that with a 5 horses! It was neck and neck for a long while. It's not a sailboat, it's a boat with sails. The Mac, turned back briefly to look at my stern. I guess he wanted to know what kind of sailboat could keep up with his POS under power. His boat rolled in the waves on his round bilge. I wondered what this guy's wife was thinking about that miserable ride. I'll bet she likes peeing in comfort though! ; ) After a while he edged away, heading off to windward. I bet he wished he had the 50 HP outboard. more HP would be great in the obvious circumstances, as long as sailing performance isn't sacrificed. In spite of the beating the Macs take here, I'd be willing to be most of the Mac owners don't know enough about sailing to be unhappy with them. Unless they come here, of course. Shortly after clearing Middle Ground the wind died to nothing for about 90 minutes. We could barely make way, heading up a bit--at right angles to our course. Later the wind shifted 180 degrees and even though it was still very light, I tried to set my new spinnaker. All hail Odin! Scout |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great Sail report, Bart!!!
RB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scout" wrote in message It was her first time sailing. Maybe next time, she think about using the bucket rather than have a wet butt for 6 hours. Depends. LOL! Good once, Scout. Max |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scout" wrote "Bart Senior" wrote [snip] My friend Fred was amazed at how high the Etchells can point. I haven't. How high would you say she can point? It will sail upwind under bare poles. I didn't bring my GPS, but I'd bet we averaged 6 knots blasting across the Sound to Port Jeff. I need 15-20 mph breezes to do that in my Starwind. The Mac couldn't even manage 6 knots with a 30 HP ob and a 12 knot headwind? My Starwind can do that with a 5 horses! He seemed to have trouble steering his course was all over the place. You need good vision in the middle of the Sound. The landmarks are hard to see. Lots of people have trouble holding a steady course. Maybe the engine was not as big as I thought. It was a Honda outboard. I didn't get a close look. They are curvy shaped and I'm not the best judge of sizing on Honda's. I could easily have over estimated, given that they put 50 hp engines on those boats. Also a four stroke would be bigger than a two stroke, so if it was a four stroke. Check this out. http://www.honda-marine.com/bf9.htm Maybe it was a 9.9? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Honda's reverse exhaust relief is an interesting idea. Of their claimed 60%
more thrust in reverse, it looks to me like 45% of that is thanks to the redirected exhaust. Those guys are always thinking. Scout "Bart Senior" wrote Check this out. http://www.honda-marine.com/bf9.htm Maybe it was a 9.9? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| sail cleaning | Cruising | |||
| Sail price from Rolly Tasker | ASA | |||
| how a sail works, who can help me explain? | ASA | |||
| Cunningham Passes On | ASA | |||