On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:02:50 -0400, Horvath
wrote:

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 01:45:12 GMT, felton wrote
this crap:

Lets get back on topic. Why can't we take a look at Kerry's
record as a reservist? Perhaps he was not reporting as required
by law.

How much reporting was he required to do in the "Ready
Reserves-Inactive" status?

http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilse...by_Reserve.pdf


Why don't you tell us?

BTW, that document you posted only applies to those who have completed
their, "statutory military obligation" which the French-looking John
Kerry DID NOT. (paragraph 2)


Not that you will be able to read down to paragraph 3, which states:


It's not applicable because he is not in compliance with paragraph 2.

Then why don't you take it up with the Navy, as they obviously differ
with your interpretation? Until such time as you can convince the
Navy that your position should take precedence over their's, I think
I'll accept that you are out of step with the Navy, rather than they
were wrong and you and Ted Sampley are right.