Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scout wrote:
Thanks for the input Walt, At first glance, I thought the author was ignoring the force of the wind on the boat itself for simplicity's sake, and making a point about forces developed by the sail. But then I realized that while the wind is approaching the sail at the same angle in both diagrams, the sideways force stayed relative to the boat's centerline and not the vertical plane of the sail. But from a practical standpoint, does total force = net force? Walt wrote: Um, yeah. The terms are more or less interchangeable. Unless you're trying to work out structural details ![]() And if so, shouldn't the net force vector show the direction of the actual path, or movement of the boat? Yes, if you include all the forces. But this diagram leaves out an important force - the resistance force of the keel. Agreed- the diagram ignored the 2nd set of forces on the foils & hull, and tried to oversimplify to the point of being misleading IMHO. Simple physics analysis usually starts out with a free body diagram where you draw all the forces on the object. AAAARRRRGH no! Now you've summoned the dreaded Navspritigator, who will soundly denounce anyone who dares utter the dread incantation "free body diagram"... In the sailboat example, there's a lateral resistance force that opposes the sideways force and nearly cancels it out. Right. And the net forward force accelerates the boat until it is cancelled out by the drag (which increases as speed builds up). ... They don't show it in the diagram, but it's there. It comes from the centerboard or keel, due to the fact that it's hard to push the boat sideways through the water. Add it in and the net force vector will be aligned with the direction of the actual path of the boat.* It's also important to keep in mind the circumstances under which the underwater foils generate this leeway-countering force. The boat must have some forward speed. It is quite possible for the boat to move sideways. Donal's observation that you have to bear away and give up some distance to leeward to gain speed for the daggerboard (or other underwater foil) to get a grip is quite accurate. There are a few boats that will accelerate from a standstill close-hauled, but not many... and the ones that will, they'll make notably more leeway at first, too. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote AAAARRRRGH no! Now you've summoned the dreaded Navspritigator, who will soundly denounce anyone who dares utter the dread incantation "free body diagram"... I caught that but was pretending it didn't happen. It's also important to keep in mind the circumstances under which the underwater foils generate this leeway-countering force. The boat must have some forward speed. It is quite possible for the boat to move sideways. I didn't realize that the forward speed increased lateral resistance. Er..wait a sec, could this also be called "lift"? Scout |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nav" wrote in message ... Donal wrote: In fact, leeway is *always* directly downwind. I learned this on my recent dinghy sailing holiday. There was an area known as "the Graveyard". It was a lee shore that had very gentle winds. Once you entered the Graveyard, you were bound to end up on the rocks. The reason was that after a tack, you would make leeway before you got forward motion. Furthermore, the wind was so light that it was impossible to get forward movement without bearing away --- which meant going even closer to the shore..... The first time that it happened to me was very disspiriting. I thought that I had forgotten everything that I knew about dinghy sailing. Was there a current to drive you onto the rock or are you saying you can't sail to windward in light winds??? Current??? Now why didn't I think of that? Sadly, there wasn't any current. Regards Donal -- |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
AAAARRRRGH no! Now you've summoned the dreaded Navspritigator, Is that like a crocagator? Not to fear, it's too cold up here for crocagators. who will soundly denounce anyone who dares utter the dread incantation "free body diagram"... Did I say free body diagram? I meant to say Free Beer. (There, that should put them off the scent...) -- //-Walt // // http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Donal" wrote In fact, leeway is *always* directly downwind. I learned this on my recent dinghy sailing holiday. There was an area known as "the Graveyard". It was a lee shore that had very gentle winds. Once you entered the Graveyard, you were bound to end up on the rocks. The reason was that after a tack, you would make leeway before you got forward motion. Furthermore, the wind was so light that it was impossible to get forward movement without bearing away --- which meant going even closer to the shore..... The first time that it happened to me was very disspiriting. I thought that I had forgotten everything that I knew about dinghy sailing. So, did you end up on the rocks? Twice!!!! ...And to make matters worse - the second time I had my wife in the boat. I had assured her that the wind was gentle, and that there was *no* chance of a capsize at all. Fortunately, she seems to have forgiven me. AFAICR, she didn't get her hair wet in the capsize. Regards Donal -- |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walt" wrote in message ... If your boat has good lateral resistance (a big keel or centerboard) this force will be nearly equal to the sideways force. I think that things are a bit more complicated than this. The boats that have the best performance to windward usually have fin keels. Fin keels have a smaller area than long keels, don't they? I think that this conundrum demands an explanation from an extremely intelligent engineer. Jax ... here's your opportunity! Regards Donal -- |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scout wrote:
I didn't realize that the forward speed increased lateral resistance. Er..wait a sec, could this also be called "lift"? Sure. As long as you don't mind confusing the unwary... who might not grasp the concept of "sideways lift." The funny thing is that you can't have lift without an angle of attack. If you have an angle of attack, you have leeway. So you must have at least a little bit of the thing you're trying to avoid, so that you can have less of it! PS- this doesn't apply to boats with toed-in bilgeboards, twin asymmetric daggerboards, or gybing centerboards. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailing against the wind depends on airfoil shape? | General | |||
Angle of prop shaft - theoretical question. | General |