LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scout wrote:
Thanks for the input Walt,
At first glance, I thought the author was ignoring the force of the wind on
the boat itself for simplicity's sake, and making a point about forces
developed by the sail. But then I realized that while the wind is
approaching the sail at the same angle in both diagrams, the sideways force
stayed relative to the boat's centerline and not the vertical plane of the
sail.
But from a practical standpoint, does total force = net force?



Walt wrote:
Um, yeah. The terms are more or less interchangeable.


Unless you're trying to work out structural details


And if so, shouldn't the net force vector show the direction of the
actual path, or movement of the boat?



Yes, if you include all the forces. But this diagram leaves out an
important force - the resistance force of the keel.


Agreed- the diagram ignored the 2nd set of forces on the foils & hull,
and tried to oversimplify to the point of being misleading IMHO.


Simple physics analysis usually starts out with a free body diagram
where you draw all the forces on the object.


AAAARRRRGH no! Now you've summoned the dreaded Navspritigator, who will
soundly denounce anyone who dares utter the dread incantation "free body
diagram"...


In the sailboat example, there's a lateral resistance force that opposes
the sideways force and nearly cancels it out.


Right. And the net forward force accelerates the boat until it is
cancelled out by the drag (which increases as speed builds up).

... They don't show it in the
diagram, but it's there. It comes from the centerboard or keel, due to
the fact that it's hard to push the boat sideways through the water.
Add it in and the net force vector will be aligned with the direction of
the actual path of the boat.*


It's also important to keep in mind the circumstances under which the
underwater foils generate this leeway-countering force. The boat must
have some forward speed. It is quite possible for the boat to move sideways.

Donal's observation that you have to bear away and give up some distance
to leeward to gain speed for the daggerboard (or other underwater foil)
to get a grip is quite accurate. There are a few boats that will
accelerate from a standstill close-hauled, but not many... and the ones
that will, they'll make notably more leeway at first, too.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

  #12   Report Post  
Scout
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote
AAAARRRRGH no! Now you've summoned the dreaded Navspritigator, who will
soundly denounce anyone who dares utter the dread incantation "free body
diagram"...


I caught that but was pretending it didn't happen.


It's also important to keep in mind the circumstances under which the
underwater foils generate this leeway-countering force. The boat must
have some forward speed. It is quite possible for the boat to move

sideways.

I didn't realize that the forward speed increased lateral resistance.
Er..wait a sec, could this also be called "lift"?

Scout


  #13   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nav" wrote in message
...


Donal wrote:


In fact, leeway is *always* directly downwind. I learned this on my

recent
dinghy sailing holiday. There was an area known as "the Graveyard".

It
was a lee shore that had very gentle winds. Once you entered the

Graveyard,
you were bound to end up on the rocks. The reason was that after a

tack,
you would make leeway before you got forward motion. Furthermore, the

wind
was so light that it was impossible to get forward movement without

bearing
away --- which meant going even closer to the shore..... The first

time
that it happened to me was very disspiriting. I thought that I had
forgotten everything that I knew about dinghy sailing.


Was there a current to drive you onto the rock or are you saying you
can't sail to windward in light winds???


Current??? Now why didn't I think of that?

Sadly, there wasn't any current.



Regards


Donal
--



  #14   Report Post  
Walt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

DSK wrote:

AAAARRRRGH no! Now you've summoned the dreaded Navspritigator,


Is that like a crocagator? Not to fear, it's too cold up here for
crocagators.

who will
soundly denounce anyone who dares utter the dread incantation "free body
diagram"...



Did I say free body diagram? I meant to say Free Beer.

(There, that should put them off the scent...)


--
//-Walt
//
// http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif
  #15   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote

In fact, leeway is *always* directly downwind. I learned this on

my recent
dinghy sailing holiday. There was an area known as "the

Graveyard". It
was a lee shore that had very gentle winds. Once you entered the

Graveyard,
you were bound to end up on the rocks. The reason was that after a

tack,
you would make leeway before you got forward motion. Furthermore,

the wind
was so light that it was impossible to get forward movement without

bearing
away --- which meant going even closer to the shore..... The first

time
that it happened to me was very disspiriting. I thought that I had
forgotten everything that I knew about dinghy sailing.


So, did you end up on the rocks?


Twice!!!! ...And to make matters worse - the second time I had my wife in
the boat. I had assured her that the wind was gentle, and that there was
*no* chance of a capsize at all. Fortunately, she seems to have forgiven
me. AFAICR, she didn't get her hair wet in the capsize.


Regards


Donal
--





  #16   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Walt" wrote in message
...
If your boat has good lateral resistance (a big keel or centerboard)
this force will be nearly equal to the sideways force.


I think that things are a bit more complicated than this.

The boats that have the best performance to windward usually have fin keels.
Fin keels have a smaller area than long keels, don't they?

I think that this conundrum demands an explanation from an extremely
intelligent engineer. Jax ... here's your opportunity!


Regards


Donal
--



  #17   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scout wrote:
I didn't realize that the forward speed increased lateral resistance.
Er..wait a sec, could this also be called "lift"?


Sure. As long as you don't mind confusing the unwary... who might not
grasp the concept of "sideways lift."

The funny thing is that you can't have lift without an angle of attack.
If you have an angle of attack, you have leeway. So you must have at
least a little bit of the thing you're trying to avoid, so that you can
have less of it!


PS- this doesn't apply to boats with toed-in bilgeboards, twin
asymmetric daggerboards, or gybing centerboards.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sailing against the wind depends on airfoil shape? Axel Boldt General 60 August 29th 04 02:33 PM
Angle of prop shaft - theoretical question. Gary Warner General 103 June 18th 04 05:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017