And Kerry has yet to show ANY signs of being a statesman. What about the
Moore movie,


Moore's film is how own work, which was started before Kerry was around.
Busted again!

RB

One tells the truth and is a war hero.

Honest George


If George is honest, then we can all believe 100% that Kerry served his country
with honor. George said so today.

Glad that's a closed case!

RB

,You could, but it doesn't wash. Bush is a small-minded drunk, who has
yet to tell us why he failed to show up for his physical.


And Kerry refuses to release his Vietnam records which would prove or disaprove
what the Swift boat vets are saying.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"Trains are a winter sport"

anybody understand this?


some idiot wrote.....

Moore's film is how own work,

On 25 Aug 2004 01:12:56 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

One tells the truth and is a war hero.

Honest George


If George is honest, then we can all believe 100% that Kerry served his country
with honor. George said so today.

Glad that's a closed case!

Nobody doubts that the French-looking John Kerry served for four
months, then ran home like the coward he is.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

"FamilySailor" wrote

Actually neither man is an idiot. ....

I'm not so sure. It's axiomatic that people will not elect anyone much
smarter than they are. This may be because they find his/her solutions to
issues hard to understand or that he/she seems to be an elitist. Worse yet,
the same 'dumbing down' we've seen in schools for several decades now
affects the electorite. Thus anyone who appears smarter than a village
idiot will be rejected. One solution is to offer a real idiot, but one wiser
party hacks can control. It's working for the GOP.

The proof comes when the ballon goes up. Consider Bush's reaction to 9-11.
Does he leap to the helm and take command of the situation? NO! He finishes
reading to the kindergarten then allows his SS protectors to whisk him to
safety for a week while Chainey and Rumsfield handled the crisis. That tells
me the good old boys from Halliburton are really in charge. But I wonder -
did Bush really drool and say "What! Me worry?" before going back to reading
to the kids?

Apparently, you think it's more important and fun to listen to crass
and cynical views, rather than be interested in the actual
issues. Clearly, Bu**** is uninterested.


If Bush would have started yelling about the partisan propaganda it would
have intensified ten-fold. Like it did with Kerry. They would have twisted
and using what he said in adds against him.

You are right "Clearly, Bu**** is uninterested" in the propaganda crap. And
I respect him for that. He does not need to waste his time correcting
partisan attacks. He will stand up when they are directed to others, but if
they are directed at him he just shrugs them off.

You don't have to link the Moore Movie to Kerry, just the DNC. The DNC are
the ones that nominated Kerry. It does not matter who they nominate. The DNC
had Moore as a big part of their convention. His movie is a big part of the
attack machine. Oh, and the DNC just happened to pick the wrong guy (Kerry).
I am so sorry about that (snicker, snicker...)

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
anybody understand this?


some idiot wrote.....

Moore's film is how own work,

Actually neither man is an idiot. It is all frenzied campaign crap. You
are
just too bias and emotional like most ;o)

No, you're right. Bush is not an idiot. He's evil and cynical.


Thank you for making my point so clear! ;o)
Like I said "You are just too bias and emotional like most."

I'm not so sure. It's axiomatic that people will not elect anyone much
smarter than they are. This may be because they find his/her solutions to
issues hard to understand or that he/she seems to be an elitist. Worse
yet,
the same 'dumbing down' we've seen in schools for several decades now
affects the electorite. Thus anyone who appears smarter than a village
idiot will be rejected. One solution is to offer a real idiot, but one
wiser
party hacks can control. It's working for the GOP.

You and other liberals maybe, but not me or any conservative I know.

The proof comes when the ballon goes up. Consider Bush's reaction to 9-11.
Does he leap to the helm and take command of the situation? NO! He
finishes
reading to the kindergarten then allows his SS protectors to whisk him to
safety for a week while Chainey and Rumsfield handled the crisis. That
tells
me the good old boys from Halliburton are really in charge. But I
wonder -
did Bush really drool and say "What! Me worry?" before going back to
reading
to the kids?

Yea and Kerry sat there in a stupor for 40 minutes unable to speak. Yea he
is the Man for the job, hahahahaha
I bet you have no idea how active Bush was from his high tech mobile command
center aboard Air Force One.
Again take a small insignificant issue and twist it to make the basis for
you decision. Get real! Partisan propaganda. But, I guess that is all you
have.
Please quit showing you ignorance, my side is starting to hurt. You can not
seriously believe Bush was not doing anything. And, he has not stopped
since. I wonder how many times Kerry would have flip-flopped every time the
French, the UN or special interest groups objected to his decision. I was
against the war, before I was for the war, before I was against the war,
before...........