LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Capt. Mooron
 
Posts: n/a
Default


OooooozeOne wrote in message
| Most waterways are wide and easy to navigate and those that aren't
| usually have steep hills either side making radar virtually useless
| because you can easily see your path.

Okay,,, now you are sounding like Nav.... what you stated makes no sense at
all Ozzy!

Good radar will clear up that mess of lights and buoys you can't spot at
night in a hurry.

CM


  #22   Report Post  
Capt. Mooron
 
Posts: n/a
Default


OooooozeOne wrote in message
| Yep, but radar can't see around corners.

I call BULL****!

CM


  #25   Report Post  
Capt. Mooron
 
Posts: n/a
Default


OooooozeOne wrote in message
...
| On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:47:21 -0300, "Capt. Mooron"
| scribbled thusly:
|
|
| OooooozeOne wrote in message
| | Yep, but radar can't see around corners.
|
| I call BULL****!
|
| CM
|
| It can?
| WOW!
| I'd always though it would only return what it can 'see'

Well there you go.... that's your problem. It can "see" much more from it's
vantage 20 feet above the deck.

CM




  #26   Report Post  
Shen44
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Umm yep, and if you can see a path thru the returns then it'd be
great.
Unfortunately in that area there is no discernable path without the
colours of the nav aids. the rest are unmaked piles and other jun


Looking at the "chartlet" you sent, I can see your problem. However, it's no
different than many other places.
My only suggestion would be to run the area with radar in good conditions so
that you can get a feel for what the radar is showing versus what you see.
This can help to draw a "mind" picture of how your set shows various objects
and where the buoys are versus other junk.
Since they appear to be buoyed channels with nearby land, there should be a
visible path through.
Don't get hung up on using the lowest range scale .... use the one which shows
you the the greatest area (within reason ... i.e. you might want to be on 1.5
or 3 mi scale at times) so that so that your screen more closely resembles you
chart.

Shen
  #27   Report Post  
otnmbrd
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One other point here.
Although I'd normally agree that the radar should help show the buoys
against a land background and make your "path" clear, it's hard to judge
what you "do" see on "your" set against what we think you should see.
The point I'd stress, is "practice". Don't just use the radar when
conditions are bad. You need to use it frequently when conditions are
good, so that you learn to interpret what you see .... probably the
biggest problem most recreational (and a lot of professional) boaters
have using radar.

otn

Shen44 wrote:
Umm yep, and if you can see a path thru the returns then it'd be
great.
Unfortunately in that area there is no discernable path without the
colours of the nav aids. the rest are unmaked piles and other jun



Looking at the "chartlet" you sent, I can see your problem. However, it's no
different than many other places.
My only suggestion would be to run the area with radar in good conditions so
that you can get a feel for what the radar is showing versus what you see.
This can help to draw a "mind" picture of how your set shows various objects
and where the buoys are versus other junk.
Since they appear to be buoyed channels with nearby land, there should be a
visible path through.
Don't get hung up on using the lowest range scale .... use the one which shows
you the the greatest area (within reason ... i.e. you might want to be on 1.5
or 3 mi scale at times) so that so that your screen more closely resembles you
chart.

Shen

  #28   Report Post  
Capt. Mooron
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Shen44" wrote in message

| My only suggestion would be to run the area with radar in good conditions
so
| that you can get a feel for what the radar is showing versus what you see.
| This can help to draw a "mind" picture of how your set shows various
objects
| and where the buoys are versus other junk.
| Since they appear to be buoyed channels with nearby land, there should be
a
| visible path through.
| Don't get hung up on using the lowest range scale .... use the one which
shows
| you the the greatest area (within reason ... i.e. you might want to be on
1.5
| or 3 mi scale at times) so that so that your screen more closely resembles
you
| chart.

Excellent Advise...... even though we all know you are usually down in the
engine room playing crib while the Wheel House sits unmanned! ;-)

CM



  #29   Report Post  
Shen44
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Excellent Advise...... even though we all know you are usually down in the
engine room playing crib while the Wheel House sits unmanned! ;-)

CM


Nah. Too bloody noisy down there.
We play in the "lounge" ..... where we have wired the alarms from the radar and
AIS to a bell. G

Shen
  #30   Report Post  
Bart Senior
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Spoken like a powerboater who "needs" radar on a sunny day.
You only need to run it once in a while, and understand how it
works. Most power boaters run it constantly for ego gratification.

"otnmbrd" wrote

The point I'd stress, is "practice". Don't just use the radar when
conditions are bad. You need to use it frequently when conditions are
good, so that you learn to interpret what you see .... probably the
biggest problem most recreational (and a lot of professional) boaters
have using radar.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Accident Emergency Question [Three part ] Bart Senior ASA 17 July 9th 04 01:16 PM
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! Bobsprit ASA 1 June 18th 04 10:37 PM
unusual docking situation Scout ASA 12 July 21st 03 01:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017