Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter S/Y Anicula wrote:
I just found out that there are english versions of the pages I linked to: http://www.frv.dk/en/nyheder/nyheder.htm#54 http://www.frv.dk/en/ifm/navigation/gps.htm Thanks for the info & the links, Peter. I'm not sure I understand this- you can tell your GPS to ignore or put less priority on certain satellites? That would be a very cool feature. It's amazing how many people have no idea how to navigate without GPS... a lot of people who use to know are so out of practice that they are functionally lost without it. On our last trip, a relatively short river jaunt of a few days (rudely interrupted by H. Bonnie and H. Charley), we were rather sloppy for the first day and had a lot of household junk piled on the chart table. When I realized I couldn't lay out a course, I threw it all on the floor (I was in a hurry, I cleaned it up myself later). We had a "serious" talk about the unwisdom of sloppy practices... the arriving hurricanes later in the week emphasized this! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Wrote:
I'm not sure I understand this- you can tell your GPS to ignore or put less priority on certain satellites? That would be a very cool feature. I don't know. First I thought it was a build in feature in all GPS receivers, that they ignored satellites marked "unhealthy". As I read the later parts of the article I got confused: "...some users believe that the DGPS system is not necessary anymore. However, this is not correct as the great advantage of the DGPS system is the ability to warn the users in case of faults on the GPS/DGPS system, by an "Integrity Warning". " ".... by using the DGPS system the users, as earlier mentioned, are warned about faults in the system, as a "station unhealthy" alarm from the Integrity Monitor is generated." Does this mean that most of the GPS receivers that sailors use do not have these facilities, and do not detect the "unhealthy" label ? Would be interesting to find out. (One day, when I have the time...) It's amazing how many people have no idea how to navigate without GPS... a lot of people who use to know are so out of practice that they are functionally lost without it. ...we were rather sloppy for the first day... Yes, when it (GPS) works so well most of the time, it is so easy to get lazy. I know that from experience. The following statement seems clear enough though: "The circumstances of this satellite fault shows that it can not be emphasized enough, that the GPS and DGPS users at all times should be aware of the fact that the systems can fail. They should therefore not blindly trust the electronic aids, but use all available aids to navigation as radar, buoys and beacons and so on when navigating in difficult waters." Peter S/Y Anicula "DSK" skrev i en meddelelse ... Peter S/Y Anicula wrote: I just found out that there are english versions of the pages I linked to: http://www.frv.dk/en/nyheder/nyheder.htm#54 http://www.frv.dk/en/ifm/navigation/gps.htm Thanks for the info & the links, Peter. I'm not sure I understand this- you can tell your GPS to ignore or put less priority on certain satellites? That would be a very cool feature. It's amazing how many people have no idea how to navigate without GPS... a lot of people who use to know are so out of practice that they are functionally lost without it. On our last trip, a relatively short river jaunt of a few days (rudely interrupted by H. Bonnie and H. Charley), we were rather sloppy for the first day and had a lot of household junk piled on the chart table. When I realized I couldn't lay out a course, I threw it all on the floor (I was in a hurry, I cleaned it up myself later). We had a "serious" talk about the unwisdom of sloppy practices... the arriving hurricanes later in the week emphasized this! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|