![]() |
(OT) Let take a vote!
Lets vote for who we want as president. Just put the person's name in the
subject. |
Bush
"FamilySailor" wrote in message ... Lets vote for who we want as president. Just put the person's name in the subject. |
Voting rules
You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check
headers on names we don't recognize. |
Voting rules
Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since
butterfly ballots. "FamilySailor" wrote in message ... You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check headers on names we don't recognize. |
Voting rules
FamilySailor wrote:
You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check headers on names we don't recognize. It won't mean anything anyway, so who cares? If you want polling data, look at http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html or http://www.pollingreport.com/ Straw polls on usenet are about as useless as tits on a bull. -- //-Walt // // http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif |
Doug :-)
In article , Walt wrote:
FamilySailor wrote: You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check headers on names we don't recognize. It won't mean anything anyway, so who cares? If you want polling data, look at http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html or http://www.pollingreport.com/ Straw polls on usenet are about as useless as tits on a bull. -- //-Walt // // http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
(OT) Norville C. Palmquist
-- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 7/22/2004 |
(OT) Let take a vote!
"FamilySailor" wrote in message ...
Lets vote for who we want as president. Just put the person's name in the subject. I'm not telling! Joe |
In your heart you know he's right.
|
Umm... he's dead.
In article .net, Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote: In your heart you know he's right. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
That makes him even more qualified!
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Umm... he's dead. In article .net, Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote: In your heart you know he's right. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
in terms of ideas: so are you
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Umm... he's dead. In article .net, Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote: In your heart you know he's right. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
"Phil Morris" wrote ... That makes him even more qualified... ....than Kerry. I agree. SV |
Don't say that! Asscroft lost to a dead guy and he because AG.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Phil Morris" wrote in message hlink.net... That makes him even more qualified! "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Umm... he's dead. In article .net, Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote: In your heart you know he's right. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
Wow... now that's witty Fishboy! You're really impressive.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "gonefishiing" wrote in message ... in terms of ideas: so are you "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Umm... he's dead. In article .net, Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote: In your heart you know he's right. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
Jeff Morris wrote:
Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military. I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC. Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true. M. Jeff Morris wrote: Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a
crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Michael" wrote in message ... Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey. Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military. I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC. Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true. M. Jeff Morris wrote: Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
Only if their fathers powerful cronies supported it.
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Michael" wrote in message ... Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey. Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military. I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC. Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true. M. Jeff Morris wrote: Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
I guess Bush qualifies then.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Philip Carroll" wrote in message ... Only if their fathers powerful cronies supported it. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Michael" wrote in message ... Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey. Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military. I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC. Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true. M. Jeff Morris wrote: Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
Jon finally figured out and admitted the Democratic way of doing things.
Duhhhh did Daddy Carville reprogram you Jon? That was your excuse for Clinton as we all recall. Remember the whiny litany "But WHAT about the Repubicans????? " as an excuse for everthing. We do. Which is why voting for Bush was seen as voting for the lesser of two evils. Still evil...just lesser. Besides it was fun getting paybacks on that idiot you ran for office......... Who we gonna get to 'boot to the head' next time? M. We're the veterans....you're the losers. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Michael" wrote in message ... Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey. Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military. I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC. Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true. M. Jeff Morris wrote: Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
Here's the true idiot folk.. someone who replies to a post from a month ago
and thinks it's timely and accurate. What a dufus. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Michael" wrote in message ... Jon finally figured out and admitted the Democratic way of doing things. Duhhhh did Daddy Carville reprogram you Jon? That was your excuse for Clinton as we all recall. Remember the whiny litany "But WHAT about the Repubicans????? " as an excuse for everthing. We do. Which is why voting for Bush was seen as voting for the lesser of two evils. Still evil...just lesser. Besides it was fun getting paybacks on that idiot you ran for office......... Who we gonna get to 'boot to the head' next time? M. We're the veterans....you're the losers. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Michael" wrote in message ... Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey. Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military. I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC. Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true. M. Jeff Morris wrote: Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since butterfly ballots. A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked. -- // Walt // // There is no Volkl Conspiracy |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com