BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)
-   -   (OT) Let take a vote! (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/21488-ot-let-take-vote.html)

FamilySailor August 13th 04 10:56 PM

(OT) Let take a vote!
 
Lets vote for who we want as president. Just put the person's name in the
subject.



FamilySailor August 13th 04 10:57 PM

Bush
 

"FamilySailor" wrote in message
...
Lets vote for who we want as president. Just put the person's name in the
subject.





FamilySailor August 13th 04 10:59 PM

Voting rules
 
You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check
headers on names we don't recognize.



Jeff Morris August 13th 04 10:59 PM

Voting rules
 
Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since
butterfly ballots.


"FamilySailor" wrote in message ...
You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check
headers on names we don't recognize.





Walt August 13th 04 11:04 PM

Voting rules
 
FamilySailor wrote:

You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check
headers on names we don't recognize.


It won't mean anything anyway, so who cares?

If you want polling data, look at
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html
or
http://www.pollingreport.com/

Straw polls on usenet are about as useless as tits on a bull.

--
//-Walt
//
// http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif

Jonathan Ganz August 13th 04 11:54 PM

Doug :-)
 
In article , Walt wrote:
FamilySailor wrote:

You vote more than once, non of your votes count, So, we need to check
headers on names we don't recognize.


It won't mean anything anyway, so who cares?

If you want polling data, look at
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html
or
http://www.pollingreport.com/

Straw polls on usenet are about as useless as tits on a bull.

--
//-Walt
//
// http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."


katysails August 14th 04 12:24 AM

(OT) Norville C. Palmquist
 


--
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 7/22/2004



Joe August 14th 04 04:40 AM

(OT) Let take a vote!
 
"FamilySailor" wrote in message ...
Lets vote for who we want as president. Just put the person's name in the
subject.


I'm not telling!
Joe

Phil Morris August 15th 04 03:56 AM

In your heart you know he's right.



Jonathan Ganz August 15th 04 05:54 AM

Umm... he's dead.

In article .net,
Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote:
In your heart you know he's right.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."


Phil Morris August 15th 04 07:52 AM

That makes him even more qualified!



"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Umm... he's dead.

In article .net,
Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote:
In your heart you know he's right.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."




gonefishiing August 15th 04 08:13 AM

in terms of ideas: so are you

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Umm... he's dead.

In article .net,
Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote:
In your heart you know he's right.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."




Scott Vernon August 15th 04 04:05 PM


"Phil Morris" wrote ...
That makes him even more qualified...

....than Kerry.

I agree.

SV




Jonathan Ganz August 15th 04 08:02 PM

Don't say that! Asscroft lost to a dead guy and he because AG.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Phil Morris" wrote in message
hlink.net...
That makes him even more qualified!



"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Umm... he's dead.

In article .net,
Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote:
In your heart you know he's right.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."






Jonathan Ganz August 15th 04 08:02 PM

Wow... now that's witty Fishboy! You're really impressive.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"gonefishiing" wrote in message
...
in terms of ideas: so are you

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Umm... he's dead.

In article .net,
Phil Morris pmorris2384/2eureka.net wrote:
In your heart you know he's right.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."






Walt August 16th 04 03:08 AM

Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of since
butterfly ballots.


A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy


Michael August 16th 04 11:53 AM

Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then
disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC is
it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the
Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised military.
I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance
from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in
Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't
worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls
withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC.
Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true.

M.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of

since
butterfly ballots.


A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy




Jonathan Ganz August 16th 04 06:28 PM

So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a
crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Michael" wrote in message
...
Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then
disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the DNC

is
it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from the
Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised

military.
I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little assistance
from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in
Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't
worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls
withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the DNC.
Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true.

M.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of

since
butterfly ballots.


A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy






Philip Carroll August 17th 04 01:13 AM

Only if their fathers powerful cronies supported it.
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a
crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Michael" wrote in message
...
Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then
disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the

DNC
is
it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from

the
Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised

military.
I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little

assistance
from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in
Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't
worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls
withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the

DNC.
Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true.

M.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of

since
butterfly ballots.

A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy








Jonathan Ganz August 17th 04 01:51 AM

I guess Bush qualifies then.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Philip Carroll" wrote in message
...
Only if their fathers powerful cronies supported it.
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a
crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Michael" wrote in message
...
Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New

Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then
disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the

DNC
is
it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from

the
Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised

military.
I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little

assistance
from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in
Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California.

Don't
worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls
withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the

DNC.
Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true.

M.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard

of
since
butterfly ballots.

A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy










Michael November 15th 04 02:23 AM

Jon finally figured out and admitted the Democratic way of doing things.
Duhhhh did Daddy Carville reprogram you Jon? That was your excuse for
Clinton as we all recall. Remember the whiny litany "But WHAT about the
Repubicans????? " as an excuse for everthing. We do. Which is why voting
for Bush was seen as voting for the lesser of two evils. Still evil...just
lesser.

Besides it was fun getting paybacks on that idiot you ran for
office......... Who we gonna get to 'boot to the head' next time?

M.

We're the veterans....you're the losers.





"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a
crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Michael" wrote in message
...
Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then
disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the

DNC
is
it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from

the
Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised

military.
I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little

assistance
from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in
Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California. Don't
worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls
withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the

DNC.
Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true.

M.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of

since
butterfly ballots.

A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy








Jonathan Ganz November 15th 04 04:50 AM

Here's the true idiot folk.. someone who replies to a post from a month ago
and thinks it's timely and accurate. What a dufus.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Michael" wrote in message
...
Jon finally figured out and admitted the Democratic way of doing things.
Duhhhh did Daddy Carville reprogram you Jon? That was your excuse for
Clinton as we all recall. Remember the whiny litany "But WHAT about the
Repubicans????? " as an excuse for everthing. We do. Which is why
voting
for Bush was seen as voting for the lesser of two evils. Still
evil...just
lesser.

Besides it was fun getting paybacks on that idiot you ran for
office......... Who we gonna get to 'boot to the head' next time?

M.

We're the veterans....you're the losers.





"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
So, what you're saying is that if someone in the past committed a
crime, it's ok to commit one now. Got it. Thanks.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Michael" wrote in message
...
Changing the rules worked in the last Senatorial campaign in New
Jersey.
Also got rid of a lot of those pesky miitary voters. But then
disenfranchising the serving military isn't exactly a change for the

DNC
is
it? Unfortunately when they tried it in Floor-i-duh theirlosses from

the
Senile Seniors far outweighed their gains from the disenfranchised

military.
I'm sure they will try again. Maybe vote by mail with a little

assistance
from the block wardens tosecure the senility problem like they have in
Oregon. Or maybe vote by Green Card like theyhave in California.
Don't
worry about new voting machines. Worry about matching voting rolls
withnames on gravestones. The spirit of Daly is far from dead in the

DNC.
Sometimes the oldways are the best ways. Tried and true.

M.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Voting by changing the subject is the stupidest thing I've heard of
since
butterfly ballots.

A stupid idea form a Bush supporter? I'm shocked, shocked.

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy











All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com