"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

"Safer" due to restricted civil rights.

Perhaps it's time YOU took that remedial reading course, Jon. Qaddafi has
surrendered his nukes, and we know for a fact that he has had numerous ties
to terrorists, including terrorist training camps within Lybia. So you
don't consider that "safer." Would Qaddafi's acquiesence have occurred if
we'd not entered Iraq?

Which good things? People all
around the world hating us?

Anti-US sentiment is nothing new. If you think we were popular with those
same folks prior to the Iraq war, you're delusional. The price of being the
only superpower . . .

High gas prices,

And you're blaming Bush for this? Have you forgotten the $2.20 per gallon
prices during the Clinton admin.?

lousy economy that's
finally starting to get better despite the idiot in the WH?

More liberal lies. The economy has been improving steadily, if slowly,
since it's pit following 9/11. And I'd like you to show me evidence that
it's improving despite what the current administration is doing/has done.
Don't bother--you can't. (Unless it's something out of a Michael Moore
flick.)

Face the facts, Jon. The only way Kerry (a throw-away candidate for the
democrats) can win is to fabricate bad news, oppose anything the Bush
administration has done (despite having supported it formerly), and hope the
American people buy into the bull****.

Here's another wrinkle fer ya: Hillary Clinton is silently praying Kerry is
defeated. If he wins, it conceivably puts off her bid for the presidency by
8 years. She'll be well into her upper sixties then, and less likely to be
a favorable candidate in the eyes of her fellow democrats, who appear to
prefer younger individuals. Her career is dependent upon Kerry's defeat.
Oh, I suspect WJC and Hillary will make a mild show of support at the
convention, but don't count on them beating the "bush" for him.

Max