Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff Morris wrote: Why do you keep claiming she was putting on makeup? The facts were presented: she was trying to take the cover off to add milk and sugar. You keep misrepresenting the facts, long after you were corrected. Why is that Jim? Does truth have little meaning for you? Actually, although I had heard reports that she was putting on makeup, I was dead wrong. - Apparently she wasn't putting on makeup. Instead, she was trying to force the top off the cup, and having difficulty doing so. What she should have done, of course, was wait until she could hold the cup securely somewhere other han over her lap, and THEN try to get the top off. In other words, if she was having trouble getting the top off a cup of coffee held over her lap in a car, she should have realized that she shouldn't continue forcing the top off, in the car. t But I wasn't wrong with respect to the underlying issue, which is that entire country is suffering from the exorbitant law suit recoveries obtained by such hot shot lawyers. I got the basic fact right, Jeff. The BASIC FACTS are that she got a hot shot lawyer who enraged the jury with inflammatory pictures of her burns and got a punitive judgment against MacDonalds that was based on their emotional reaction to the pictures, and not on any rational consideration of whether MacDonalds, or the lady, should pay for their was negligence. - This was confirmed when the award was substantially reduced on appeal. The FACTS are that judgments of this kind, and the defensive measures resulting from the threat of them, are a major drag on our economy for both small and large business, and in particular, a major reason our medical costs are the highest in the world. The end result of lawsuits like this is a continued tax on all of us due to the added costs to business. Where they relate to medical issues, they are a major factor in the continued rise in the costs of health care and medical insurance, to levels beyond those that many people can afford. In other words, Jeff, because of tort recoveries such as that one (ignoring who was at fault, and what both parties SHOULD have done) punitive tort recoveries are a major reason that millions of American citizens can't get or can't afford meaningful health care. It's also a major factor in the precarious status of Medicare, lack of care for the indigent, etc., Additionally, related costs to businesses add to unemployment and underemployment in many sectors of our economy. But I suppose that we got one positive result out of the MacDonalds suit. - We can now get lukewarm coffee from MacDonalds that we can safely hold in our laps while we sit in our car. - Does that give you some nice warm fuzzies Jeff? Jim "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: My recollection is that she had to have multiple skin grafts. Macboy is quite an attorney! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bought repaired canoe - positioning of seats/carry yoke correct? | Touring | |||
bought a GPS | Cruising | |||
( OT ) Iraq Coalition Casualtitys ( Coalition of the bought?) | General | |||
OT Hijacking a discussion, was Bought cool new digital charger....$89? | Electronics |