You got the same grades in reading comprehention as Homer Simpson, eh?

DOHHHH!!!

I didn't say "stopped" I said "cut short" and if YOU were on the inside
you'd
know that's exactly what happened - that "resources" who almost had
O'Sammy
in hand were diverted to Iraq. Hmmm...??

Your right you said cut short. I guess it was cut down to only 10,000
soldiers according to Jonathan. 10,000 soldiers looking for ole Bin, or is
that O-bee-whan, use the force Luke. (I digress)

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:26:54 -0500, "FamilySailor" wrote:

You got the same grades in reading comprehention as Homer Simpson, eh?

DOHHHH!!!

I didn't say "stopped" I said "cut short" and if YOU were on the inside
you'd
know that's exactly what happened - that "resources" who almost had
O'Sammy
in hand were diverted to Iraq. Hmmm...??

Your right you said cut short. I guess it was cut down to only 10,000
soldiers according to Jonathan. 10,000 soldiers looking for ole Bin, or is
that O-bee-whan, use the force Luke. (I digress)

Which is fewer than the number of police officers in Manhattan, while
we sent 150,000 to get one man, Saddam, who had nothing to do with
9/11.

In case you have failed to notice, we haven't gotten bin Laden.

I've been telling my wife for some months that I expect we'll get him around
August or September, at which point the Dems will claim there was some deep
dark plot to time the capture just before the election.

Which there may have been, but if he is apprehended, who cares about little
tweaks to the timing. It is not like michael moore's movie came out this
summer coincidentally.