Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job.
I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
what have you got against burger flippers?
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I eat too many of them.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... what have you got against burger flippers? "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In desperate need !
If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the heck are you talking about????
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Madelin McKinnon" wrote in message om... In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brilliantly insightful!
"Madelin McKinnon" wrote in message om... In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message link.net...
Brilliantly insightful! "Madelin McKinnon" wrote in message om... In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm i love the 'unanimous jury' link |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Everyone knows who killed Laci Peterson.
It was John Kerry. See how much fun it is to lie like a liberal! Madelin McKinnon wrote In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fine, write me a check.
Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. The companys that got the frequency specturm stood likely to make billions, but not right away. First they had to pay for it, and they didn't have the money. To finance all that, telecom corporations faked growth figures and bankers financed them when they shouldn't. When growth figures were not met, Nokia and other cell makers crashed followed by telecom stocks, then the whole tech sector, then the entire market. If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Jonathan Ganz wrote I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry you lost your job, but your facts are twisted around.
Anyone who takes a dispassionate look at the economy would see that Clinton did everything he could for the economy, while Bush did nothing. Clinton lied about a blow job. Bush lied about WMDs and a war that has brought this country nothing but heartache and discrace. Clinton never lied about his lack of service. Bush didn't even bother to show up for his physical. Clinton may be a sex addict, but Bush is addicted to alcohol. Good on him that he hasn't had a drink in a long time. I hope he stays sober throughout the rest of his term, although he acts like he's drunk most of the time. He's inarticulate and low brow. He picked a liar and a cheat for his VP, as well as for most of his cabinet. He picked a guy for attorney general who lost an election to a dead guy and who annointed himself with oil. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bart Senior" wrote in message t... Fine, write me a check. Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. The companys that got the frequency specturm stood likely to make billions, but not right away. First they had to pay for it, and they didn't have the money. To finance all that, telecom corporations faked growth figures and bankers financed them when they shouldn't. When growth figures were not met, Nokia and other cell makers crashed followed by telecom stocks, then the whole tech sector, then the entire market. If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Jonathan Ganz wrote I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |