![]() |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat.
A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? How is it used? Why would you want one? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Day Tank A glass-containing vessel made from refractory blocks mainly used for the melting of batch for coloured glass, crystal glass and soft special glasses. Day tanks are refilled with batch daily, with melting usually done at night and glass production the following day. Used for producing larger quantities of glass than is possible with pot furnaces (see "pot"). The type of glass to be melted can be changed at short notice. He who lives in a glass boat shouldn't throw seashells???? In actuality, it's a type of diesel storage system that uses a gravity siphon....I have no idea why you'd want one except (i'll guess) it would relieve having your engine pump the diesel in? (That's just a guess from someone who can change oil but really doesn't much get into the mechanics of it all...) -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004 |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 02:43:05 GMT, "Bart Senior"
wrote: I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat. A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? The fueltank connected to the engine. How is it used? Uh, as a tank. You fill it with a pump from the maintank(s). Why would you want one? To get the weight balanced, and keep the fuelline to the engine short. Cheers! Remco PS, wasn't the guy Dick Koopmans? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 02:43:05 GMT, "Bart Senior"
wrote this crap: I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat. A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? M-1 Abrahms How is it used? Battlefield superiority Why would you want one? To be invincible. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
It is a fuel tank, baring any esoteric definitions. He might be a seasoned
sailor, or he might be an hvac technician, who would also call "certain" fuel filled tanks, daytanks. In the mechanical trades, they're part of an elaborate fuel delivery system that offers a few benefits over the conventional main tank to fuel pump relationship. Scout "Bart Senior" wrote in message . net... I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat. A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? How is it used? Why would you want one? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 02:43:05 GMT, "Bart Senior"
wrote: I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat. A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? smaller aux tank which contains a days worth of fuel How is it used? fuel is filtered and transfered to the daytank for immediate use Why would you want one? as part of an onboard fuel polishing system. A choice of many people who don't have rapid turnover of fuel in the main tank. Allows for secondary and continuous on board fuel filtration. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
2 points--for the first two questions.
katysails wrote it's a type of diesel storage system that uses a gravity siphon....I have no idea why you'd want one except (i'll guess) it would relieve having your engine pump the diesel in? (That's just a guess from someone who can change oil but really doesn't much get into the mechanics of it all...) |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Marc wrote On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 02:43:05 GMT, "Bart Senior" wrote: I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat. A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? smaller aux tank which contains a days worth of fuel Also these are typically gravity fed. How is it used? fuel is filtered and transfered to the daytank for immediate use Why would you want one? as part of an onboard fuel polishing system. A choice of many people who don't have rapid turnover of fuel in the main tank. Allows for secondary and continuous on board fuel filtration. 1 point. Main tanks tend to accumlate dirt and sludge. By filtering and filling your day tank, before leaving the dock, you are assured a clean supply of fuel. The gravity feed also makes it easier to bleed the fuel system if that becomes necessary. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Scout wrote:
It is a fuel tank, baring any esoteric definitions. He might be a seasoned sailor, or he might be an hvac technician, who would also call "certain" fuel filled tanks, daytanks. In the mechanical trades, they're part of an elaborate fuel delivery system that offers a few benefits over the conventional main tank to fuel pump relationship. Yep. But certain folks really like elaborate & complex & difficult-to-operate systems. And the benefits are real enough *if* you are the type who will not take good care of the fuel unless forced to. Disadvantages: more expensive, more bulky, greater likelihood of spillage, more valves & lines to maintain. Advantages: offers a check on fuel quality (note: the same checks can be done with a regular fuel system also), allows easy priming, allows the engine to keep running if lift pump fails. IMHO a day tank does not make sense on a small cruising boat. Big ships draw fuel from "service" or "ready" tanks that are the same concept, but the fuel is measured in tons rather than gallons and all the storage tanks are certain to have a lot of seawater sloshing around in the bottoms, so stripping it in transfer to ready tank makes sense. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
DSK wrote: Advantages: offers a check on fuel quality (note: the same checks can be done with a regular fuel system also), allows easy priming, allows the engine to keep running if lift pump fails. IMHO a day tank does not make sense on a small cruising boat. Big ships draw fuel from "service" or "ready" tanks that are the same concept, but the fuel is measured in tons rather than gallons and all the storage tanks are certain to have a lot of seawater sloshing around in the bottoms, so stripping it in transfer to ready tank makes sense. Only on Navy combatants .... otherwise there'd better NOT be any sal****er in those main storage tanks .... water, maybe some (from the fuel) but not sal****er. Main reason on larger vessels is to clean and for heavy fuel, to get to right temp. otn |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
I made a point of not reading the answers of the others but using this as a
good method to segue back into .asa. Day Tank is one used for water or fuel. You have to fill it with the amount you want to use, per your rationing requirements. When it runs out you are done for that day. How'd I do? Michael "Bart Senior" wrote in message . net... I got these from a Dutch Sailor who built his own boat. A short conversation and a single observation proved to me that this fellow was an experienced sailor. [3 pts] What is a day tank? How is it used? Why would you want one? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
otnmbrd wrote: Only on Navy combatants .... otherwise there'd better NOT be any sal****er in those main storage tanks .... water, maybe some (from the fuel) but not sal****er. On the big ships I did contract work on, more than a few (maybe half?) had service or ready tanks and transferred fuel daily. The really big diesels are apparently capable of gulping in a few gallons of seawater now & then. The steamships aren't any problem at all unless it is a big enough slug of water to put all the burners out at once. Of course it's pretty bad for the machinery, but why complain when we were making so much money fixing it? A good thing, too. The wipers are *supposed* to check the seperator bowls at least hourly, but I used to put notes on the seperators in big letters "Bring Me This Note Immediately Upon Finding... $5 Reward" and had the whole watch go by. Main reason on larger vessels is to clean and for heavy fuel, to get to right temp. Just this past weekend, I was explaining to a guy with a big motorsailer what a "cleavage manifold" was. That's always been one of my favorite terms! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
2 points--for the first two questions. YIPPEEE!!!!! I finally got two Bart points!!!!! -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004 |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
2 points--for the first two questions.
YIPPEEE!!!!! I finally got two Bart points!!!!! -- katysails No,he said "pints". I think he wants to get you drunk. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Doug,
I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. Of course, he's since gone mad and I can't confirm. Scout "DSK" wrote in message ... otnmbrd wrote: Only on Navy combatants .... otherwise there'd better NOT be any sal****er in those main storage tanks .... water, maybe some (from the fuel) but not sal****er. On the big ships I did contract work on, more than a few (maybe half?) had service or ready tanks and transferred fuel daily. The really big diesels are apparently capable of gulping in a few gallons of seawater now & then. The steamships aren't any problem at all unless it is a big enough slug of water to put all the burners out at once. Of course it's pretty bad for the machinery, but why complain when we were making so much money fixing it? A good thing, too. The wipers are *supposed* to check the seperator bowls at least hourly, but I used to put notes on the seperators in big letters "Bring Me This Note Immediately Upon Finding... $5 Reward" and had the whole watch go by. Main reason on larger vessels is to clean and for heavy fuel, to get to right temp. Just this past weekend, I was explaining to a guy with a big motorsailer what a "cleavage manifold" was. That's always been one of my favorite terms! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
No,he said "pints". I think he wants to get you drunk. 2 pints would put me into a coma.... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004 |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
AFAIK most, if not all, freighters use water for ballast.
I loaded a box weighing 110K lbs. , onto a small ship in Balt. They used the 2 ship cranes to pick it. The ship heeled over when they tried to lift. Had to wait what , seemed like an hour, to fill the starboard side ballast tank. Scotty "Scout" wrote in message ... Doug, I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. Of course, he's since gone mad and I can't confirm. Scout "DSK" wrote in message ... otnmbrd wrote: Only on Navy combatants .... otherwise there'd better NOT be any sal****er in those main storage tanks .... water, maybe some (from the fuel) but not sal****er. On the big ships I did contract work on, more than a few (maybe half?) had service or ready tanks and transferred fuel daily. The really big diesels are apparently capable of gulping in a few gallons of seawater now & then. The steamships aren't any problem at all unless it is a big enough slug of water to put all the burners out at once. Of course it's pretty bad for the machinery, but why complain when we were making so much money fixing it? A good thing, too. The wipers are *supposed* to check the seperator bowls at least hourly, but I used to put notes on the seperators in big letters "Bring Me This Note Immediately Upon Finding... $5 Reward" and had the whole watch go by. Main reason on larger vessels is to clean and for heavy fuel, to get to right temp. Just this past weekend, I was explaining to a guy with a big motorsailer what a "cleavage manifold" was. That's always been one of my favorite terms! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
AFAIK most, if not all, freighters use water for ballast.
A good number of sailboats do as well. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
"Bobspirt" wrote in message
... AFAIK most, if not all, freighters use water for ballast. A good number of sailboats do as well. what's a good number, 12 ? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
what's a good number, 12 ?
12 is a pretty good number. However, I have always been partial to 8. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
0U812?
Scout "Bobspirt" wrote in message ... what's a good number, 12 ? 12 is a pretty good number. However, I have always been partial to 8. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
jons' license plate # ?
69-0U812 "Scout" wrote in message ... 0U812? Scout "Bobspirt" wrote in message ... what's a good number, 12 ? 12 is a pretty good number. However, I have always been partial to 8. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
jons' license plate # ?
69-0U812 Now, I get it. Nasty. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
I probably should have mentioned that he said they sometimes put the water
in their fuel (bunker C or #6) tanks. At least I believe that's what he said. Scout "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... AFAIK most, if not all, freighters use water for ballast. I loaded a box weighing 110K lbs. , onto a small ship in Balt. They used the 2 ship cranes to pick it. The ship heeled over when they tried to lift. Had to wait what , seemed like an hour, to fill the starboard side ballast tank. Scotty "Scout" wrote in message ... Doug, I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. Of course, he's since gone mad and I can't confirm. Scout "DSK" wrote in message ... otnmbrd wrote: Only on Navy combatants .... otherwise there'd better NOT be any sal****er in those main storage tanks .... water, maybe some (from the fuel) but not sal****er. On the big ships I did contract work on, more than a few (maybe half?) had service or ready tanks and transferred fuel daily. The really big diesels are apparently capable of gulping in a few gallons of seawater now & then. The steamships aren't any problem at all unless it is a big enough slug of water to put all the burners out at once. Of course it's pretty bad for the machinery, but why complain when we were making so much money fixing it? A good thing, too. The wipers are *supposed* to check the seperator bowls at least hourly, but I used to put notes on the seperators in big letters "Bring Me This Note Immediately Upon Finding... $5 Reward" and had the whole watch go by. Main reason on larger vessels is to clean and for heavy fuel, to get to right temp. Just this past weekend, I was explaining to a guy with a big motorsailer what a "cleavage manifold" was. That's always been one of my favorite terms! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
|
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
I would have bet against this, beforehand.
"Scout" wrote in message ... http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/...a/stg4-10.html |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Scout wrote:
Doug, I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. All Navy ships have the capability of ballasting with sea water, not just "bigger ships." In fact the newer gas turbine powered combatants *have* to be ballasted because there is no heavy boiler mounted down low in the hull. Their fuel storage tanks have a system that lets in seawater to the bottom of the tank as the fuel is sucked from the top. Of course, he's since gone mad and I can't confirm. It's difficult to adjust to shore life, I sympathize with the poor guy. DSK |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
how do they keep the fuel oil off the water when they 'dump ballast'?
SBV "DSK" wrote in message ... Scout wrote: Doug, I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. All Navy ships have the capability of ballasting with sea water, not just "bigger ships." In fact the newer gas turbine powered combatants *have* to be ballasted because there is no heavy boiler mounted down low in the hull. Their fuel storage tanks have a system that lets in seawater to the bottom of the tank as the fuel is sucked from the top. Of course, he's since gone mad and I can't confirm. It's difficult to adjust to shore life, I sympathize with the poor guy. DSK |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Even better. katysails wrote: No,he said "pints". I think he wants to get you drunk. 2 pints would put me into a coma.... -- jlrogers±³© Never date a woman you can hear ticking. - Mark Patinkin Eschew Obfuscation. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Years ago it was quite common. Sea water was added while fuel remained in
the tank. The fuel floated on top and was still usable. Environmental concerns has about ended the practice, however. Scout wrote: I probably should have mentioned that he said they sometimes put the water in their fuel (bunker C or #6) tanks. At least I believe that's what he said. Scout "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... AFAIK most, if not all, freighters use water for ballast. I loaded a box weighing 110K lbs. , onto a small ship in Balt. They used the 2 ship cranes to pick it. The ship heeled over when they tried to lift. Had to wait what , seemed like an hour, to fill the starboard side ballast tank. Scotty "Scout" wrote in message ... Doug, I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. Of course, he's since gone mad and I can't confirm. Scout "DSK" wrote in message ... otnmbrd wrote: Only on Navy combatants .... otherwise there'd better NOT be any sal****er in those main storage tanks .... water, maybe some (from the fuel) but not sal****er. On the big ships I did contract work on, more than a few (maybe half?) had service or ready tanks and transferred fuel daily. The really big diesels are apparently capable of gulping in a few gallons of seawater now & then. The steamships aren't any problem at all unless it is a big enough slug of water to put all the burners out at once. Of course it's pretty bad for the machinery, but why complain when we were making so much money fixing it? A good thing, too. The wipers are *supposed* to check the seperator bowls at least hourly, but I used to put notes on the seperators in big letters "Bring Me This Note Immediately Upon Finding... $5 Reward" and had the whole watch go by. Main reason on larger vessels is to clean and for heavy fuel, to get to right temp. Just this past weekend, I was explaining to a guy with a big motorsailer what a "cleavage manifold" was. That's always been one of my favorite terms! Fresh Breezes- Doug King -- jlrogers±³© Never date a woman you can hear ticking. - Mark Patinkin Eschew Obfuscation. |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
DSK wrote: Scout wrote: Doug, I had a friend who told me they use sea water as ballast on bigger ships in the navy, possibly CG. All Navy ships have the capability of ballasting with sea water, not just "bigger ships." In fact the newer gas turbine powered combatants *have* to be ballasted because there is no heavy boiler mounted down low in the hull. Their fuel storage tanks have a system that lets in seawater to the bottom of the tank as the fuel is sucked from the top. G Guess I need to clarify my statements. For Navy combatants, see DSK's above. For the majority of commercial, salt water ballast is kept separate from fuel tanks, so that any water in the fuel tanks comes about the same way as water in a small boats tanks. The fuel (#6, HFO, Bunker C ... all names for the same BASIC stuff) is transferred from storage tanks to settler tanks, then run through purifers/filters and pumped to day tanks (been awhile, so the engineers can correct my errors). DFO/MDO (diesel) is handled in much the same way. On most newer ships, these tanks will never be used for sal****er ballast. In the past, commercial ships used their double bottoms for fuel (always got a kick outa this, after everyone started hollerin for DB's on tankers cause freighters had them) and ballast, once the fuel had been pumped out. Where this practice was/is done, the tanks are "decanted" of water to a level close to, but not at, the oil/water interface, prior to filling with fuel again. As you can imagine, this can lead to pumping amounts of oil overboard if things don't go exactly right. Now, this might be acceptable for the Navy, due to their operating parameters, but it will get a commercial ship in a world of hurt .... and not being active Navy, I can't speak for how well they do and how well their systems are designed to handle this. The biggest problem with 6 oil when doing this, is that it is very close to the weight of sal****er and the oil/water interface is not always well defined. otn |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Newport News for two more weeks. Then back to Seattle and Port Townsend for
a month of schools and upgrades (200 ton and oceans with radar endorsement). A couple of weeks working on the new boat etc. My good friends up in the Pac NW area have been more than supportive in many ways. In fact a lot of good friends up and down the coast fit that category. Then back to sea for the last go round before I switch from diesels back to sails. Had a couple of good offers in the long term charter skipper business and the delivery business. The real key though is the upgrades I mentioned, especially going from near coastal to oceans. Lot of difference, especially where insurance companies concerned between the two. I think I can squeeze those jobs in between going hither and yon and writing about it (my basic plan). For now though I'm going to remain true, get the new boat done and it's turning into a real gem! Don't know if you read it elsewhere but if things go completely right I'm trucking the boat to the Great Lakes, down the St. Lawrence, round the corner and will be right by your bailiwick early next Summer. Then down the coast to the islands and on, eventually, to Bequia back west and eventually NW to Corpus and truck to San Diego. All part of an article I'm doing for one of the magazines. Then lay over the summer in S. Cal with some other friends awaiting the end of the storm season and on down to the S.Pacific without the usual ho hum stops in Mexico again. That place is like California without trees and after awhile it's just bribes and booze. If things don't go well time wise then I'll just head South, hang a while at my slip in California and go into the next, the Pacific part a bit early then return back and do the East Coast trip a bit later. Either way it works for me. The Pacific part? I'm thinking Juan Fernandez Islands off Chile and just about have my good sailing buddy Kai talked into to doing that part especially since it goes right by Easter Island. THEN back up to Hawaii where he has his boat and re-create the voyage of the schooner Pau! At Samoa where we stopped the last time I can go in acouple of directions, doesn't matter. Lots of good things to write about just in this one paragraph. I'm getting more into the idea of doing interesting alternatives to the usual, everyone's done it a thousand times trips I guess. Too much panicky deck fluff and overweight bar bunnies for me. You know . . .sail down wind, truck up wind? Mights well watch reality TV. I guess I shouldn't be too hard. Some can, some won't. Don't know if you saw it or not but check the May issue of Lats and Att's for an article called View From The Bridge. That's my first one. Next article will be to the editor around theend of the month and we'll see if lightning strikes twice. Actually, they asked for more! Little surprise here and there my good buddy and someone many of you know, the original skipper and creator of the Pau voyage has steered me in theright direction with invaluable advice and editing. In a former life he was a professional writer as it happens. And I might's well toot Ole Thom's praises as well as this next article was caused by something he started teaching me some years ago. Yep! I paid attention. It's called Emergency Navigation for Yacht Crews as a working title. Not for the GPS and Martooni set that's for sure. Just wind, waves, stars and fingers. Lucky I have a few left! 'nuff of this . . . . Here's a question for you to pose. What's a Seattle Head? Cheers Michael "Bart Senior" wrote in message et... Good Michael. How are you doing? Where are you now? Michael wrote I made a point of not reading the answers of the others but using this as a good method to segue back into .asa. Day Tank is one used for water or fuel. You have to fill it with the amount you want to use, per your rationing requirements. When it runs out you are done for that day. How'd I do? Michael "Bart Senior" wrote [3 pts] What is a day tank? How is it used? Why would you want one? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Good Michael. How are you doing?
Where are you now? Michael wrote I made a point of not reading the answers of the others but using this as a good method to segue back into .asa. Day Tank is one used for water or fuel. You have to fill it with the amount you want to use, per your rationing requirements. When it runs out you are done for that day. How'd I do? Michael "Bart Senior" wrote [3 pts] What is a day tank? How is it used? Why would you want one? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
I don't think having a feed hose connected is de riguer for a day tank. As
I recall when the term is used for daily water ration it is often described as something as simple as a one gallon jug. In the case of Thom's OB tank however there would have to be another, presumably larger main tank involved. If the OB tank was the only one on board then it wouldn't be the day tank but the main fuel supply. Perhaps a betterway to describe that would be using a five gallon fuel can (main tank) and the little tank atop something like a SeaGull. If you stated that was your daily ration then it would be a day tank. No feed line involved but the resulting spills would surely get seventeen agencies gathered round for a MARPOL violation! No points needed. I'm giving Katy a chance to catch up for the next month at least! M. "Bart Senior" wrote in message . .. To answer your question, I'd say no, because there is no other tank feeding it. Certainly the opposite viewpoint could be argued. Thank you Thom, because you just gave me the solution to a problem. An outboard tank could be modified to be used as a day tank for a diesel engine and give you a fuel gauge too! I can't think of any sailboats I've sailed that had a fuel gauge. Most of the time I've banged on tanks and judged by sound or used a measuring stick. Even without a gauge, a red plastic outboard fuel tank is translucent enough to judge ift you have enough fuel to prevent the hassle of bleeding a diesel fuel system. I've been thinking about mounting a day tank in ECHO and you just gave me the cheap solution I was looking for! I just need to figure out how and where to mount one. Thom Stewart wrote Question Bart? Would you consider the remote fuel tank on an Outboard Aux a day tank? Ole Thom |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
I'll guess and say it's a board with a hole cut in it.
Michael wrote What's a Seattle Head? |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
Question Bart?
Would you consider the remote fuel tank on an Outboard Aux a day tank? Ole Thom |
Question inspired by a Dutch sailor.
To answer your question, I'd say no, because there is no
other tank feeding it. Certainly the opposite viewpoint could be argued. Thank you Thom, because you just gave me the solution to a problem. An outboard tank could be modified to be used as a day tank for a diesel engine and give you a fuel gauge too! I can't think of any sailboats I've sailed that had a fuel gauge. Most of the time I've banged on tanks and judged by sound or used a measuring stick. Even without a gauge, a red plastic outboard fuel tank is translucent enough to judge ift you have enough fuel to prevent the hassle of bleeding a diesel fuel system. I've been thinking about mounting a day tank in ECHO and you just gave me the cheap solution I was looking for! I just need to figure out how and where to mount one. Thom Stewart wrote Question Bart? Would you consider the remote fuel tank on an Outboard Aux a day tank? Ole Thom |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com