jeffies, get your wife to explain it to you.

"JAXAshby" repeated his blunder with:

it is forbidden to install the water injection point below the water line,
therefore there is no use for an anti-siphon valve. None. There is no
siphon
potential at all on a properly installed system.

Why do you keep saying this? There is absolutely no mention of the in the
ABYC
standards, the CFR, or on any other web site. They all simply say the a
siphon
break should be used. While many boats use risers to reduce the risk of
siphoning, the standards are clear that a siphon break is required if the
manifold is below the water line.

You keep claiming its "forbidden" but you have never said who forbids it nor
have you backed up your claim with any references.

I'm sure you'll respond with one of your juvenile "comebacks" which only
serve
to prove you really have no idea what you're talking about, and you're too
much
of a coward to admit it.

oxxy, from the crackbox universe, asks how it is that exhaust valves are
sometimes closed and why is there any pattern therein thusly:

My understanding...obviously better than yours, is that at certain
stages of the 4 stroke cycle its possible to pass air from the inlet
tract over the piston and out thru the exhaust.

not possible with a closed exhaust valve, as specified in the discussion
from
the start.

Again, how do you guarantee a closed ex valve every time?


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.