Then what is the question?

Bush may be down in the polls but he beats Kerry in every category:
competence, character, decisiveness, ability to lead, vision, etc.

So if Bush is at 42%, Kerry would be at 25%. Bush will win in a landslide,
look at what he's up against. The Democrats may someday stand a chance if
they run a real person for President rather than someone richer than Bush
and a self admitted murderer at that. How many innocent civilians did Kerry
claim to kill?

BC

Well, it isn't a matter of if...

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
nk.net...
Then what is the question?

Bush may be down in the polls but he beats Kerry in every category:
competence, character, decisiveness, ability to lead, vision, etc.

So if Bush is at 42%, Kerry would be at 25%. Bush will win in a landslide,
look at what he's up against. The Democrats may someday stand a chance if
they run a real person for President rather than someone richer than Bush
and a self admitted murderer at that. How many innocent civilians did
Kerry
claim to kill?

BC

Bob Crantz wrote:

How many innocent civilians did Kerry
claim to kill?

I assume that you are cleverly trying to get somebody to point out that
Bush has killed over 10,000 innocent civilians. Well, I won't help you.

If you want to highlight the civilian slaughter that Bush is overseeing,
then you should do it yourself!


Regards


Donal
--

Bob Crantz wrote:

Then what is the question?

Who's going to clean up the mess?

--
//-Walt
//
// http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net...
Then what is the question?

The Democrats may someday stand a chance if
they run a real person for President rather than someone richer than Bush.

Yeah if he win the price of coffee is going to go thru the roof.


and a self admitted murderer at that. How many innocent civilians did Kerry
claim to kill?


Now now BC, he did try to discrace himself and his crew, they were
in a hostile war zone. Even if Kerry thinks he murdered people he is
wrong. His goal at the time was to get in Jane Fondas pants. He works
that way it seems. What ever breeze blowing by he will ride downwind.
Seems great at the time, but sucks if you want to get anywere.

Just like in Iraq today, some lame fighters take refuge around
citizens hoping that will protect them. Some are even silly enough to
think they can shot us from a church or a shrine , that we will not
fire back. It's the lowest form of scum that fights that way. Like the
neighborhood brat that runs and hides under his moms skirt when he
know he about to get his ass whipped.

So even if Kerry says he murdered people in Vietnam, I do not believe
it. If anyone murdered the citizens it was the cowards fighting a war
and running under the skirts of the local citizens for protection.

Joe

BC

Joe,

I agree with you this time, Joe, about hiding behind innocent people. A
good example is taking place in Iraq this morning. The S---heads are
saying we attacked a Wedding and killed civilians and children. The Time
of the attack was 3:00AM local time! Do they marry on the Late Shift
over there?

The videos they are showing, on TV, carrying childrens bodies have no
location. Makes you wonder what children were doing at 3:00 AM?

You are right; PHONY SCUM!!!

OT

Thom Stewart wrote:
The S---heads are
saying we attacked a Wedding and killed civilians and children. The Time
of the attack was 3:00AM local time! Do they marry on the Late Shift
over there?

The videos they are showing, on TV, carrying childrens bodies have no
location. Makes you wonder what children were doing at 3:00 AM?

I wonder who is telling the truth?

"Witness, Mortada Hamid, 35, speaking to AFP by telephone from
Makreddine village, in the Qaim region, said he was in his house when
two US helicopters flew overhead at about 6:00 pm (1400 GMT).

He said the planes opened fire as wedding revellers were firing their
guns in a traditional celebratory gesture."


"In a telephone interview, an Iraqi Health Ministry official said the
hospital in Qaim, the town closest to the attack site, reported 42 dead
and nine wounded in the attack. The dead included 17 men, 11 women and
14 children, and the wounded included one man, four women and four
children, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity."

But:

"Among those killed in the attack were "34 to 35 men" and "less than a
handful of women," Kimmitt said, speaking at a press conference here.
U.S. ground troops remained at the site "for an extensive period of
time," he said, and did not find any dead children among the casualties."


Cheers