"Vito" wrote in message
...
snip
Female breasts are a good example. Breasts had nothing to do with sex per se
until prudes demanded they be covered. Thus the only time US men see them is
before sex so most are conditioned to associate them with sex that they are
a fetish in America. Prudes have declared the organs God provided for
children to suckle dangerous to children ... and we're idiotic enough to
believe it. Want to protect children? Lynch a prude!!


While I agree with some of what you say, I think on this point you're quite
wrong. In most (perhaps all?) advanced species sexual attractiveness is very
dependent on features not related directly to reproduction. Are peahens
attracted to peacocks with certain feathers because sometime in the past a
prudish pea society forced them to be covered? I think not!