Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Horvath wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2004 09:46:17 -0400, Walt Horvath wrote: You should follow the news. President George W. Bush is ahead in every poll. BZZZZZZT!!!! Wrong, dumbass. Some polls have Bush ahead, some have Kerry ahead, all are within the margin of error. CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll. May 7-9 N=575 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 5. Bush 48% Kerry 47% There ya go. You've admitted that President George W. Bush is ahead. Sometimes I think you strain yourself pretending to be stupider than you are. It must not be an easy task, but somehow you manage. Anyway, you said he was ahead in every poll. He's not. Not only that, he's not ahead in *any* poll beyond the margin of error. But you wouldn't understand what it means for results to be statistically significant, would you? -- //-Walt // // There's a village in Texas that's missing its idiot. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 May 2004 09:23:17 -0400, Walt
wrote: Horvath wrote: On Tue, 11 May 2004 09:46:17 -0400, Walt Horvath wrote: You should follow the news. President George W. Bush is ahead in every poll. BZZZZZZT!!!! Wrong, dumbass. Some polls have Bush ahead, some have Kerry ahead, all are within the margin of error. CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll. May 7-9 N=575 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 5. Bush 48% Kerry 47% There ya go. You've admitted that President George W. Bush is ahead. Sometimes I think you strain yourself pretending to be stupider than you are. It must not be an easy task, but somehow you manage. Anyway, you said he was ahead in every poll. He's not. Not only that, he's not ahead in *any* poll beyond the margin of error. But you wouldn't understand what it means for results to be statistically significant, would you? Your analysis is flawed in that you assume the popular vote may dictate the outcome of the election. ![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excellent quote. Isn't that what the people of Iraq now have the ability to
do? I haven't seen any documentation of protesting during the Hussein regime. The bottom line is that the Islamic extremist hate anyone or anything not Islamic. Read the Koran and don't try and interpret what it means. Take the words as they are and it calls for the elimination of everything not for Allah. The Jews are the closest target and the U.S. is the biggest target. Once they are eliminated don't you think they would move to other targets of opportunity, Europe (already major inroads there), Russia, China (how would the communists there will feel about that?). If Bush wasn't there, there would still be the hatred. Sooner or later it would be an issue that would have to be addressed via force. Does anyone really think that 9/11 would be prevented with a different President or, at best, only delayed? The situation is far more complex than claiming that Bush stole the presidency. Wake up! Bill OzOne wrote in message ... http://islandimage.net/oc/13myths/MythItem.cfm?ID=59 After John McCain -- the Senator from Arizona -- was released from captivity as a POW in Vietnam, he was asked, "How did it feel when you heard Americans were protesting the war?" He said, "I thought that's what we were fighting for -- the right to protest." Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
felton wrote:
Your analysis is flawed in that you assume the popular vote may dictate the outcome of the election. ![]() I wasn't doing analysis. Just refuting an obviously false assertion. Obviously, the outcome of the election is not dependent on the popular vote, but rather the results of sixty races. If I was doing analysis, I'd start by explaining why it's sixty and not 50 or 51 as most people think. But who has the time? There's work to be done on the boat. -- //-Walt // // Sigs suck. Oh, the irony. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
Sometimes I think you strain yourself pretending to be stupider than you are. It must not be an easy task, but somehow you manage. IMHO Horvath is actually a bolshevik who wants to drag President Bush down by pretending to be a supporter. DSK |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMHO Horvath is actually a bolshevik who wants to drag President Bush
down by pretending to be a supporter. And it's working. RB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Walt wrote: Sometimes I think you strain yourself pretending to be stupider than you are. It must not be an easy task, but somehow you manage. IMHO Horvath is actually a bolshevik who wants to drag President Bush down by pretending to be a supporter. By that logic, Bobspit is a John Birch Society member who wants to prop him up by pretending to be a detractor. Nah, I don't think so. Every village has an idiot. Some have several. -- //-Walt // // Sigs suck. Oh, the irony. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
By that logic, Bobspit is a John Birch Society member who wants to prop him up by pretending to be a detractor. That's possible. Nah, I don't think so. Every village has an idiot. Some have several. This newsgroup must be operating on some kind of affirmative action then, seems like we have more than our quota ![]() FB Doug King |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Walt wrote: Nah, I don't think so. Every village has an idiot. Some have several. This newsgroup must be operating on some kind of affirmative action then, seems like we have more than our quota ![]() In this case it seems to be attracting them from other villages. See http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y1D626B48 -- //-Walt // // Sigs suck. Oh, the irony. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think he's just in drag.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "DSK" wrote in message .. . Walt wrote: Sometimes I think you strain yourself pretending to be stupider than you are. It must not be an easy task, but somehow you manage. IMHO Horvath is actually a bolshevik who wants to drag President Bush down by pretending to be a supporter. DSK |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|