| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
OzOne wrote: On Thu, 06 May 2004 11:18:56 +1200, Navigator scribbled thusly: OzOne wrote: On Thu, 06 May 2004 10:40:09 +1200, Navigator scribbled thusly: OzOne wrote: On Thu, 06 May 2004 09:41:18 +1200, Navigator scribbled thusly: Are you taling about a radial cut? Cheers Nope, different beast. Star cut is all radials, no crosscut section like the radial head or triradial. Star cut is a reaching and heavy air spinnaker. I'm referring to Doug's talk about cross cut spinnakers. Try to keep up Oz! Cheers I'm keeping up quite well thanks. Here is what Doug said "Many Lightnings do use star cuts, they are flat reaching or heavy air 'chutes. For running & light air, the old fashioned cross cut is better. It can be cut with deeper shape, bigger shoulders, and it's lighter because there is less seam per unit area." Just to clarify, I believe that when he talks about a running spinnaker that is "old fashioned cross cut" he would be refering to a radial headed x cut as it most common. So you've never seen a cross cut spinnaker? Cheers Where did I say that? But the answer would be No, not that I recall. Well Doug raised the term cross cut and I wondered if he was confused (giving him the benifit of the doubt you see) and really talking about radial heads. Cross cut spinnakers largely disappeared years ago but check this out: http://www.schurrsails.com/fscross.htm Cheers |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Navigator wrote:
... Cross cut spinnakers largely disappeared years ago Really? That must be why the current North and Sobstad runners on Lightnings (and a few other one designs I believe) are all cross cut. If you look at the panels on the spinnaker you've been criticizing for a week, you'd see plainly that it is cross cut. DSK |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: ... Cross cut spinnakers largely disappeared years ago Really? That must be why the current North and Sobstad runners on Lightnings (and a few other one designs I believe) are all cross cut. If you look at the panels on the spinnaker you've been criticizing for a week, you'd see plainly that it is cross cut. I said 'largely' and even gave a URL (read the post) to all cross cut spins Doug. So what are you trying to get at, are you saying that radial cuts are not the most common running spinnaker by far? Cheers |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Navigator wrote:
...So what are you trying to get at Can you not read plain English? DSK |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: ...So what are you trying to get at Can you not read plain English? I don't think you should question my knowlege or command of English Doug. Perhaps you should try to think about what you posted and the context of my simple question before you fly off the handle further. Cheers |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Navigator wrote:
I don't think you should question my knowlege or command of English Doug. Why? You seem unable to understand simple sentences. ... Perhaps you should try to think about what you posted and the context of my simple question before you fly off the handle further. I have not flown off the handle, just pointing out that what I posted was not complex nor difficult to understand, so why don't you grasp it? DSK |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not
correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Tell me Doug, why did you say that they were cross cut? Are you confused or BSing? Are you now going to take my spinnaker advice and get a faster radial sail? Cheers DSK wrote: Really? That must be why the current North and Sobstad runners on Lightnings (and a few other one designs I believe) are all cross cut. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Navigator wrote:
Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Please quote the part that says specifically which spinnakers the 2003 World (or for that matter the 2003 NA) champs use. In fact it says specifically that the R-2 and RC-1 are *reaching* spinnakers. You know the difference between reaching and running, yes? If you looked further down that same page you find the Bruin and another cross cut runner. "The Bruin has long been recognized for the downwind performer that it is. Slightly flatter in the middle for 1998, the Bruim is much more an all-around performer with little sacrifice to its proven broad reaching and running performance." Gee, you must be wetting your pants thinking that you've *finally* shown me wrong, for once. Of course, you almost were a man and admitted your mistake about those big old wooden ships, but now that's all behind you, eh? Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Navvie! Fresh Breezes (to them wot kin use 'em)- Doug King |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Navigator wrote:
Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King Is it "bluff and bluster" that North builds cross cut spinnakers and says themselves that they are faster for running and broad reaching? It's right on their web site, right one the exact page you quoted! Possibly you missed the bit about "reaching" and "pole a foot off the forestay." Or maybe you didn't grasp what it means? DSK |