Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Vernon wrote: define ''potentially expensive engine problems'', please. $5,000.00 SV "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Scott Vernon wrote: http://www.boating-forum.com/crusing..._ft_vs_ODay_34 _172742.html Actually, the link is further evidence that you're a moronic cretin. confirming the fact that I have been considering other boats before finally deciding on the Mac 26M late last month. just when you thought he couldn't look any dumber. I liked the Cal 34, and I would have been willing to put up with its problems and consider it a "project boat," since it needed a complete refurbishing of the interior, new headliner, upholstery, etc. - I had mixed emotions about it, since I wouldn't be able to enjoy the versatility and various other advantages available with the Mac. My wife, however, didn't want to get into the "project boat" thing, and definitely didn't like the somewhat messy interior of the Cal. The O'Day had potentially expensive engine problems. There were also several other used boats that we also looked at, but all of them seemed to have one or more potentially serious repair issues. Later that month, I looked into the Mac again, and inspected one at the local dealer, and placed an order (on March 25). - Where's the inconsistency, Benz? I told you all along that I was considering several different boats, including the Cal and the Mac. As I have explained previously, I never thought that the Mac 26M was a perfect boat suitable for all applications, and I never claimed that it would sail faster or more smoothly then a large displacement boat, or that it would be a great choice for a transatlantic crossing. My point has been that the discussions regarding the Mac have been so unbalanced as to be almost ludicrous, even libelous, and that the the boat has a lot of good qualities and unique advantages that haven't been fairly considered. Further, as noted in the Pracital Sailor article regarding the previous X model, its owners are pleased with it, and they get lots of pleasure sailing it, according to the PC article. - I know that some people buy finely built, fast, large boats and enjoy the fact that they can brag about being able to get that extra half-knot of speed, or the fact that THEY COULD sail it anywhere they wanted to, if they had time. But for most of us, isn't being able to get out on the water conveniently and quickly and getting pleasure sailing the boat and enjoying getting out on the water with friends or family the more important factor? Jim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote ... But for most of us, isn't being able to get out on the water conveniently and quickly and getting pleasure sailing the boat and enjoying getting out on the water with friends or family the more important factor? It is for me, that's why I don't ''sail'' a Mac26Mx. SV |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope. It proves you're a liar.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: http://www.boating-forum.com/crusing..._172742.htm l Actually, the link is further evidence confirming the fact that I have been telling the truth about considering other boats before finally deciding on the Mac 26M late last month. Jim |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Absolute proof (On topic) | General | |||
Jim Cate, boat dealer rep? | ASA | |||
Another Boat show | ASA | |||
Usage of motoroil | General | |||
Irrefutable proof of dangerous multihulls. | ASA |