| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
uffda.
bject: uffda.
From: "Jeff Morris" Jeff, trying to clarify anything for Jax, would be like Jax trying to "clarify" his position in fog by taking bearings on a fog signal ... and praying he'd learned enough about chart reading to identify the correct signal. Shen "JAXAshby" wrote jeffies, get your wife to read to you what you wrote, and have her explain it to you. your statement does clearly show its intention that 2* not likely, but 5* do-able. Yup. That's right. jeffies, if you meant -- as you say now -- there was no way in hell of getting even 5* just why did you not state that 10* or 15* or more had some real degree of probabity? There's clearly no limit to how badly YOU might screw it up. Instead, you use words to indicate 2* maybe, and you defended your statement again and again and again. I try to clarify your misconception several times. Don't blame me for your learning disability. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Uffda!! What a bunch of dummies | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
