"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
Directional errors are always additive

jeffies, please don't bother to post again. you have long ago proven you are
unable to hold a discussion.

This is your little way of saying you concede totally. Yes, we all understand.



There are times when I believe you post stupidly just to be a wothless
dip****.
There are other times I feel you really don't have the mental capacity to
drive a car after dark. If you don't post anymore, at least we can hope you
are just plain dumber than deer in the headlights.


So tell us all, jaxie, how much 3 degrees time 5 degrees?

This is your little way of saying you concede totally.

not at all. it does say trying to hold a discussion with you is less
productive than trying to hold a discussion with a television.

So tell us all, jaxie, how much 3 degrees time 5 degrees?


the question lacks enough information to make sense. you would know that
jeffies if you had taken even one of those courses you claim your degree is in.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
So tell us all, jaxie, how much 3 degrees time 5 degrees?
the question lacks enough information to make sense.


There's plenty of information. You said:

"Think about it. the error of the mag compass reading TIMES the error of the
helmsman gives the potential error UP TO THAT POINT. Already, you are
waaaaaaaaaay beyond 2*. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond."

How do you multiply the two errors? Is the total possible error more or less
than the sum?

jeffies you dolt, the context was there in my statement but uttterly lacking in
your question.

my statement, with its contextual information, was fully explained. you are
welcome to go back through the posts to that explanation if you are so
inclined. otherwise, we will just keep on considering you a blithering idiot.

So tell us all, jaxie, how much 3 degrees time 5 degrees?
the question lacks enough information to make sense.


There's plenty of information. You said:

"Think about it. the error of the mag compass reading TIMES the error of the
helmsman gives the potential error UP TO THAT POINT. Already, you are
waaaaaaaaaay beyond 2*. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond."

How do you multiply the two errors? Is the total possible error more or less
than the sum?

What's the matter, jaxie? Are you too cowardly to admit you made a dumb
comment? Its a simple question, jaxie, how to you multiply two compass errors?
You claimed it was easy. Then you claimed anyone would understand. So tell us,
what's 3 degrees times 5 degrees?


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
jeffies you dolt, the context was there in my statement but uttterly lacking
in
your question.

my statement, with its contextual information, was fully explained. you are
welcome to go back through the posts to that explanation if you are so
inclined. otherwise, we will just keep on considering you a blithering idiot.

So tell us all, jaxie, how much 3 degrees time 5 degrees?
the question lacks enough information to make sense.


There's plenty of information. You said:

"Think about it. the error of the mag compass reading TIMES the error of the
helmsman gives the potential error UP TO THAT POINT. Already, you are
waaaaaaaaaay beyond 2*. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond."

How do you multiply the two errors? Is the total possible error more or less
than the sum?

yuk

Message-id:


[snip]

There we have it. Jaxie tells everything he remembers from high school math.


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
yuk

Message-id:


[snip]

So tell us all, jaxie, how much 3 degrees time 5 degrees?


JAXAshby wrote:
the question lacks enough information to make sense. you would know that
jeffies if you had taken even one of those courses you claim your degree is in.

Not at all, Jaxxie. If you had a tenth of the mathematical erudition you
like to pretend to, you could have said that different kinds of errors
sum or multiply differently, and referred to dot-products and
cross-products.

We all know what it means... don't you?

DSK

yuk



[ ]