you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you
didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no
more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

I see, as per usual, you couldn't answer my question. Why is that Jax?
Why is it you always avoid answering peoples questions? Can't "google"
fast enough?
Let's be blunt, you gave a BS dissertation on RDF, full of errors. The
only thing anyone could hold you up as an example for, is an example of
why a newbie should take a Power Squadron or CG aux. course.
I must agree with others .... you are approaching "meltdown" far more
quickly this time.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you
didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no
more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.

ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below:

you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize
you
didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be
no
more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.

As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below:


you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize

you

didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be

no

more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.

you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so
clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it
works.

you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light
is on inside the oven.


As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below:


you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize

you

didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be

no

more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.

Subject: There you have it, Folks.
From: (JAXAshby)

Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very
distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?)
mark.

Shen

you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so
clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it
works.

you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light
is on inside the oven.


As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below:


you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize

you

didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be

no

more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.

ah, now I see the problem shen. you don't know what the English word
"question" means. Or else you confuse it with the English word "pontificate".

not enough years in high school for you, shen. you should have stayed a few
more.

Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very
distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?)
mark.

Shen

you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so
clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it
works.

you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the
light
is on inside the oven.


As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below:


you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize

you

didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could
be

no

more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.

On 11 Mar 2004 18:09:18 GMT, (Shen44) wrote:

Subject: There you have it, Folks.
From: (JAXAshby)

Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very
distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?)
mark.

Shen

Nah...Jax is like a squid. Whenever he sees a question he disappears
in a cloud of ink to cover his retreat A useful trait for a squid,
which are edible, but who would really want to catch a Jaxfish,
anyway?


you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so
clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it
works.

you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light
is on inside the oven.


As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below:


you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize

you

didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be

no

more accurate. duh.

no wonder you pontificated.

LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you....

Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile
radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer
to (it's your statement)....care to answer?

As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either
using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was
dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well
fall into the ranges stated.
New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing
if they didn't "align" it with the compass?

otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any
reasonable response.