![]() |
have blue
JAXAshby wrote:
oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is
claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
ah, I forgot about Perpetual Motion drives. Thanks for reminding me.
However, using electric motors that can regenerate through the propeller is viable and is being done today. no, it isn't. Ahh yep it is Jocks. http://solomontechnologies.com/Solom...allations.html Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
have blue
Jeff Morris wrote:
Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. I'm still pretty skeptical, 3 kW is neary 5 Hp, allowing for some losses it's going to be equivalent to stapping a 5 horse outboard to your bow and run it full throttle trying to push the boat back. This might have a significant impact on performance, speed wise, no? Cheers Marty |
have blue
jon, I have been hearing that very same story regarding fuel cells since I was
in junior high school in the 50's. let's see when they arrive on the market. hey're getting competitive quickly. Another few years and it'll make sense for most boats to go this way. Fossil fuels are a stupid solution. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Costs are going to get competitive over time sure they are. in the 25th century, or by the 29th century for sure, if not by the year 4,000. Even when you include a small genset for the "diesel-electric" approach there's a big win in the long term "total cost of investment." *if* total cost of investment means total cost of investment the breakeven point may never be reached. but keep hoping and praying. |
have blue
joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company?
Go away. You're stupid and boring. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs could be competitive. AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
didn't make it to fuel cells at this point, though it has been "nearly here"
for a couple decades. If it works so extremely well for heavy, small volume welding bottle tanks why hasn't it caught in the much more profitable market of fuel cells? Excactly, as for 'honeycomb', I believe you're thinking of metal hydride storage, as is used for acetylene bottles, I think it's a well proven technology. Cheers Marty |
have blue
oh, I see why you didn't understand. you didn't know that watts = hp. such a
pity. Also you seem unable to comprehend that ~750 watts put into a battery bank for one hour gives back ~hp per hour, less inefficiencies. don't worry, just go with the flow. oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp
stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
The was with a 47 foot, 20,000 pound catamaran doing over 9 knots in a 20+
breeze, with two of the 12hp electric wheels. Your mileage may vary. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... Jeff Morris wrote: Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. I'm still pretty skeptical, 3 kW is neary 5 Hp, allowing for some losses it's going to be equivalent to stapping a 5 horse outboard to your bow and run it full throttle trying to push the boat back. This might have a significant impact on performance, speed wise, no? Cheers Marty |
have blue
JAXAshby wrote:
oh, I see why you didn't understand. you didn't know that watts = hp. such a pity. Very good Jax, write that watts = hp-hrs in one post, then write that watts = hp in another when it's pointed out to you that watts and hp are both units of power, brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Cheers Marty |
have blue
JAXAshby wrote:
didn't make it to fuel cells at this point, though it has been "nearly here" for a couple decades. If it works so extremely well for heavy, small volume welding bottle tanks why hasn't it caught in the much more profitable market of fuel cells? I believe the poblem lies in the rate at which the gas can be extracted/stored, this is a function of the surface area of the hydride, for large fuel cells used for transportation functions you can't get enough gas to feed the fuel cell during periods of heavy demand. Cheers Marty |
have blue
but still ... 5 hp drag on the boat. that is a lot.
The was with a 47 foot, 20,000 pound catamaran doing over 9 knots in a 20+ breeze, with two of the 12hp electric wheels. Your mileage may vary. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... Jeff Morris wrote: Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. I'm still pretty skeptical, 3 kW is neary 5 Hp, allowing for some losses it's going to be equivalent to stapping a 5 horse outboard to your bow and run it full throttle trying to push the boat back. This might have a significant impact on performance, speed wise, no? Cheers Marty |
have blue
hey dum-dum, the context was clearly watts for hours, and compared to hp for
hours. what word didn't you understand? Very good Jax, write that watts = hp-hrs in one post, then write that watts = hp in another when it's pointed out to you that watts and hp are both units of power, brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Cheers Marty |
have blue
Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours
generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
JAXAshby wrote:
hey dum-dum, the context was clearly watts for hours, and compared to hp for hours. what word didn't you understand? Jax you would appear less of an idiot if you would learn to "Oops, I made a small error" once in while. I was you who wrote out a somewhat garble expression which had energy on one side of an equals sign and power on the other, context has nothing to do with it. I'll post your words again so you can read them slowly: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours" This statement is quite unequivical, it first states that the product of current and volts and time is watts, wrong; it then states that watts are equivelent to hp-hours (assuming a conversion factor), also wrong. Cheers Marty |
have blue
ah, I see your problem now. when you read 1,728 watts stored you didn't
realize that if you took that energy back out you could get 2.3 hp back out for one hour, or 0.23 hp for 10 hours, or 0.0023 hp for a thousand hours or 23 hp for six minutes or 230 hp for 36 seconds, or 2300 hp for 3.6 seconds or 23000 hp for about 1/3 second. All less inefficiencies, of course. bax, you need to read more slowly, paying particular attention to content. I'll post your words again so you can read them slowly: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours" This statement is quite unequivical, it first states that the product of current and volts and time is watts, wrong; it then states that watts are equivelent to hp-hours (assuming a conversion factor), also wrong. Cheers Marty |
have blue
so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock?
okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
I thought also the "energy density" was much worse as compared to gasoline.
I believe the poblem lies in the rate at which the gas can be extracted/stored, this is a function of the surface area of the hydride, for large fuel cells used for transportation functions you can't get enough gas to feed the fuel cell during periods of heavy demand. Cheers Marty |
have blue
sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get
back to us. SV "JAXAshby" wrote AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A
system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
okay, here's the math condensed.
173 days sailing needed to produce enough energy to motor 1 day. sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get back to us. SV "JAXAshby" wrote AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
Regeneration will not provide for
all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. even at the cost of 5 hp pushing backwards on the boat as you sail? it seems to me to be a damned expensive way to move a boat. why not buy a little Honda generator and drag a 55-gallon drum behind the boat. same net effect, and cheaper, too. |
have blue
If you don't want to regen, just run the genset - Its still more efficient than
a diesel engine . However, in the tradewinds many boats can generate a lot of power without compromising speed. This is obviously not the solution for everyone, however it is becoming viable for some. I can see this is all too complicated for you. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. even at the cost of 5 hp pushing backwards on the boat as you sail? it seems to me to be a damned expensive way to move a boat. why not buy a little Honda generator and drag a 55-gallon drum behind the boat. same net effect, and cheaper, too. |
have blue
How much sailing to motor for 15 minutes.
take a few days, if needed. SV "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... okay, here's the math condensed. 173 days sailing needed to produce enough energy to motor 1 day. sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get back to us. SV "JAXAshby" wrote AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
Poor jaxie is off by a factor of around 30 or 40 because he assumed the
generator is the same one he uses on his bicycle. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... okay, here's the math condensed. 173 days sailing needed to produce enough energy to motor 1 day. sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get back to us. SV "JAXAshby" wrote AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
Sounds like a reasonable set up. Most daysailors motor 15 minutes to leave
slip, then sail a few hours, and motor 10 minutes to return to slip. Should work well for that. And a gen-set as a back up. Scotty SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
The sailing school Bart worked at in Norwalk has a fleet of daysailors
(Ensigns?) that are fitting with small electric motors. They don't bother to regen because they only need 10 minutes to get out and back into the marina. "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Sounds like a reasonable set up. Most daysailors motor 15 minutes to leave slip, then sail a few hours, and motor 10 minutes to return to slip. Should work well for that. And a gen-set as a back up. Scotty SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
I almost forgot, I used to sail my 16'er on a 'no engine' reservoir and used
a trolling motor. SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... The sailing school Bart worked at in Norwalk has a fleet of daysailors (Ensigns?) that are fitting with small electric motors. They don't bother to regen because they only need 10 minutes to get out and back into the marina. "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Sounds like a reasonable set up. Most daysailors motor 15 minutes to leave slip, then sail a few hours, and motor 10 minutes to return to slip. Should work well for that. And a gen-set as a back up. Scotty SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
no need to take "a few days". the answer is 173 * 15/60/24 = days sailing
needed. How much sailing to motor for 15 minutes. take a few days, if needed. SV "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... okay, here's the math condensed. 173 days sailing needed to produce enough energy to motor 1 day. sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get back to us. SV "JAXAshby" wrote AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
did you ever get out jr high?
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... jon, I have been hearing that very same story regarding fuel cells since I was in junior high school in the 50's. let's see when they arrive on the market. hey're getting competitive quickly. Another few years and it'll make sense for most boats to go this way. Fossil fuels are a stupid solution. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Costs are going to get competitive over time sure they are. in the 25th century, or by the 29th century for sure, if not by the year 4,000. Even when you include a small genset for the "diesel-electric" approach there's a big win in the long term "total cost of investment." *if* total cost of investment means total cost of investment the breakeven point may never be reached. but keep hoping and praying. |
have blue
Probably. At least I'm not a dinosaur in my thinking.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company? Go away. You're stupid and boring. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs could be competitive. AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
no, I assumed the standard generator size that is normally belted to a prop to
produce amps, the one that steals about 1/3 hp from the boat speed. you, on the other hand jeffies, assumed a generator that steals about 5 hp from the boat speed. I figure now you didn't then know what 3 KW means, so now you are trying to run around in circles until you turn into butter. Poor jaxie is off by a factor of around 30 or 40 because he assumed the generator is the same one he uses on his bicycle. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... okay, here's the math condensed. 173 days sailing needed to produce enough energy to motor 1 day. sounds like too long jax, re-do your math. Take a couple days, then get back to us. SV "JAXAshby" wrote AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
let's see. 2 22 hp engines running a total of 25 minutes uses (with 100%
efficiency) uses approzimatedl 13,752.345627 watts. The boat produces (at 9 knots) about 3,000 watts. This means that with 100% efficiency that sailboat only has to make 9 knots for just under 5 hours. And at 9 knots for 5 hours, the boat is 45 miles away. howya gonna git home in 10 minutes in that boat? Sounds like a reasonable set up. Most daysailors motor 15 minutes to leave slip, then sail a few hours, and motor 10 minutes to return to slip. Should work well for that. And a gen-set as a back up. Scotty SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
they also had shoreside batt chargers AND they didn't want to slow down their
boats by dragging a bucket behind. The sailing school Bart worked at in Norwalk has a fleet of daysailors (Ensigns?) that are fitting with small electric motors. They don't bother to regen because they only need 10 minutes to get out and back into the marina. "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Sounds like a reasonable set up. Most daysailors motor 15 minutes to leave slip, then sail a few hours, and motor 10 minutes to return to slip. Should work well for that. And a gen-set as a back up. Scotty SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
have blue
However, in the tradewinds many boats can generate a lot of
power without compromising speed. this is not generally the statement made by those who have towed water powered gens behind their boats. In fact, most such sailor report it costs them about a half knot or more boat speed to generate even 70 watts, let alone 3,000 watts. |
have blue
why, yes I did.
did you ever get out jr high? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... jon, I have been hearing that very same story regarding fuel cells since I was in junior high school in the 50's. let's see when they arrive on the market. hey're getting competitive quickly. Another few years and it'll make sense for most boats to go this way. Fossil fuels are a stupid solution. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Costs are going to get competitive over time sure they are. in the 25th century, or by the 29th century for sure, if not by the year 4,000. Even when you include a small genset for the "diesel-electric" approach there's a big win in the long term "total cost of investment." *if* total cost of investment means total cost of investment the breakeven point may never be reached. but keep hoping and praying. |
have blue
ah, I see. all it takes to make fuel cells viable is FAITH!!!
okay joony. anything you say. Probably. At least I'm not a dinosaur in my thinking. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... joony, do you have stock in yet another fuel cell company? Go away. You're stupid and boring. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... But the elect. motor/gen. sounds ideal if the costs could be competitive. AND if you are willing to sail for 173 days straight just to motor less than a day. (see prior post). |
have blue
ah, I forgot about Perpetual Motion drives. Thanks for reminding me.
Hardly perpetual motion. The sails provide the horsepower to recharge for the most part. no, "for the most part" nobody uses the technology/techniques suggested because the **** don't work. dragging buckets to gather water to pour on a watermill to turn the propeller is still dragging buckets. It slows you down. To the extent there is any gain at all, it is more costly, heavier, less reliable than a gas or diesel fired engine. |
have blue
The 47 foot, 20,000 lb. cat my numbers are from used two 12 horse engines. Running off a 10 kW
genset, it could make 7 knots. So your numbers are, typically, off by a factor of three. Further why do you assume the boat sails out as far as it can, and then powers all the way back? Is that what you normally do? Most people will sail back to their marine or inlet, etc. and then power in. -- -jeff "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 2 22 hp engines running a total of 25 minutes uses (with 100% efficiency) uses approzimatedl 13,752.345627 watts. The boat produces (at 9 knots) about 3,000 watts. This means that with 100% efficiency that sailboat only has to make 9 knots for just under 5 hours. And at 9 knots for 5 hours, the boat is 45 miles away. howya gonna git home in 10 minutes in that boat? Sounds like a reasonable set up. Most daysailors motor 15 minutes to leave slip, then sail a few hours, and motor 10 minutes to return to slip. Should work well for that. And a gen-set as a back up. Scotty SV "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... No, the regen isn't necessarily needed if you start with a topped of battery. A system like this gives one a lot of options. Regeneration will not provide for all needs, except in limited cases. However, it is nice if it can supply a substantial part of the use. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... so, the regen doesn't really work unless you plug the batteries in at the dock? okay. but, if that is the case why buy the regen equipment? Jaxie, you're having your typical comprehension problem. The 32 hp-hours generated should be enough for an hour or two of powering - plenty to power the cat out and back into the inlet. Since the batteries give 2 to 4 hours of backup, it isn't really necessary to regenerate if you're day sailing out of a slip. If you want to do long distance powering or motorsailing, you need to run a genset. However, a genset run at optimum rpm for recharging will be a lot cheaper to run than twin diesels. "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... let's see. 22 amps at 144 (sic) volts when sailing 18 knots, for about 4 hp stored per hour times 8 hours gives about 32 hp hours. yup, that works. you sailed 144 miles and now you're going to motor back using 1 hp and you are going to do it in just 32 hours (actually about 20 hours after taking out ineffiencies). Being a little sloppy with the units is not that bad - his real blunder is claiming 72 Watts output. The Condor catamaran claims 22 Amps at 144 Volts, or over 3 kW output when regenerating in a good breeze. They generate enough sailing during the day to power in and out of their inlet. "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: oh, you mean horsepower can not be compared to watts? Gee, the European engine manufacturers do it all the time. somebody should tell them you can't do that. No, I mean this: "6 amps at 12 volts for 24 hours = 1,728 watts, which = 2.3 hp-hours." Amps times Volts times hours = Watt-hrs, a unit of energy Horspower times hours= hp-hrs, a unit of energy Watts are units of power Horsepower is a unit of power (who would of thought it?) Energy and power are two different things, which you well know. Cheers Marty |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com