Your daughter has good taste. Was she bred from the same sailor as your son?

SV

Ozzy scribbled thusly:

I know what you mean, but honestly, I saw that joke and a short bit by
Robin
Williams. Did Jonny Depp get anything for his gay pirate movie?

Scotty

Nope!
But my daughter has seen the pic about 6 times.

How many idiots would you say on City Is.?


I felt that the above comment and it's phrasing said it all.
I was right.

RB

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:06:53 -0500, DSK wrote
this crap:

Scott Vernon wrote:

I would have felt it was a reflection more on the owners ability, rather
than the boats.

We sailed our Hunter in 35 knot winds at least a dozen times. Apparently some
are better than others... either the boats or the sailors, take yer pick.

Wuss! I sailed my 25' Hunter in 60 knot winds.

Here's a tip. NEVER gybe in 60 kt. winds. I'm suprised the traveler
didn't rip right off, but then, it's a very sturdy boat.




This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

On 02 Mar 2004 00:11:32 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

I would have felt it was a reflection more on the owners ability, rather
than the boats.

Scotty, the early 80's Hunters were notorious for heavy, heavy weatherhelm
problems. I was also warned off by a LOT of people, including former owners.
The most common complaint for the 27 and 30 was that heavy air of any degree
overpowered the boat easily.

That's total bull****. my first sailboat was a 1980 hunter, and it
was definately NOT overpowered. I always considered it underpowered.
I always thought it needed three more feet of mast.

That said, I found that the early Cherebuni Hunters have held up as well as the
Pearsons and certainly better than many Catalinas.

The early Hunters were very sturdy.




This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

You're full of ****. I mean your boyfriend.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:06:53 -0500, DSK wrote
this crap:

Scott Vernon wrote:

I would have felt it was a reflection more on the owners ability,
rather
than the boats.

We sailed our Hunter in 35 knot winds at least a dozen times. Apparently
some
are better than others... either the boats or the sailors, take yer pick.

Wuss! I sailed my 25' Hunter in 60 knot winds.

Here's a tip. NEVER gybe in 60 kt. winds. I'm suprised the traveler
didn't rip right off, but then, it's a very sturdy boat.




This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

never heard of it. must be expensive if you drink it.

Scotty


Ozzy scribbled....

Bundaberg just happens to be the finest sailors rum on the planet.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

The only time your Hunter saw 60 kt winds was on the delivery truck.

Scotty


"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:06:53 -0500, DSK wrote
this crap:

Scott Vernon wrote:

I would have felt it was a reflection more on the owners ability,
rather
than the boats.

We sailed our Hunter in 35 knot winds at least a dozen times. Apparently
some
are better than others... either the boats or the sailors, take yer pick.

Wuss! I sailed my 25' Hunter in 60 knot winds.

Here's a tip. NEVER gybe in 60 kt. winds. I'm suprised the traveler
didn't rip right off, but then, it's a very sturdy boat.




This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

Yup, I'll make a profit on her, for sure.

SV

wrote

Good to know you've already rehearsed the best way to get rid of a
Siedlemann.

BB
wrote:

I sold my Hobie and my 16'er for the same that I paid. The Mac I sold
for
22% more than I paid. I've already had offers for more than I paid
for
the
Seidelmann, but I don't want to sell her. She is NOT a stepping stone.

Yup, I'll make a profit on her, for sure.


You said you won't sell her. Changed your mind?

RB

No. That's *IF* I were to sell her. I don't think of my boats as 'stepping
stones'.

S

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Yup, I'll make a profit on her, for sure.


You said you won't sell her. Changed your mind?

RB