Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Cate" wrote in message
... .... Obviously, it would be foolhardy to permit multiple passengers to ride on top of the cabin and foredeck in the Mac, or any small boat, under those conditions. What? Are you saying its unsafe to sit forward in a normal power boat? What about all of those "bowriders" outs there? The Mac is clearly unsafe without its water ballast. The admonishments include: no more than 4 people. Keep crew aft, low and centered. The kids can't even stay in the forward bunk! They actually tell you not to use the forward bunks when underway! They say it is unsafe in seas higher than one foot! So much for coming in from offshore. You can't stand on the deck because someone might grab the mast to hold on! What? They're afraid someone might pull the boat over trying to hold on??? No, this is not typical of a 26 foot sailboat, nor is it typical of a 26 foot powerboat. Jeff, have you had many dealings with corporate attorneys? Or tort lawyers? If you had, you would recognize that these warnings, if taken literally, are something like the warnings posted in our health center warning us to be sure to wear our seat belt when using the Nautilus weight training equipment. Or, like the long list of warnings you get when you purchase any electrical appliance, audio equipment, etc. Actually, the new 26M has 300 pounds of additional permanent ballast, in addition to the water ballast, for providing added stability when motoring without the water ballast. (The previous model, the 26X, didn't have this feature, yet I haven't heard of hundreds of Mac 26X owners being lost at sea because they didn't stay below deck when motoring the boat without the ballast. In essence, when under power without the water ballast, the boat is a small, lightweight power boat, and you have to take reasonable precautions to keep the com low. (On the other hand, if you can provide statistics regarding hundreds of Mac sailors being lost at sea because they didn't stay in the cabin when motoring without the water ballast, I would like to see those statistics.) Total nonsense. First you extol all the "virtues," asserting everything claimed by the factory must be true; now you're saying all their warnings and disclaimers are meaningless because a lawyer told them add this in. Frankly, I've never warnings like this from any other sailboat manufacturer. Why is it that this one feels the need? If you did look at the statistics, you'd realize that death from sinking in medium size sailboats in coastal waters is rather uncommon. The vast majority of deaths is from capsizing or falling off of unstable boats; followed closely by hitting something at speed. All of these are much greater risks in a boat like a mac. I'm not talking about 2 or 3 times more common - there's only a handful of deaths from traditional cruising boats sinking, but hundreds from falling overboard, or capsizing. Think about it, Jim. 99% of drownings involved boats with foam floation. If you really care about safety you should do some real hard thinking here. Do you really think your grandkids are safer on a lightly built, overpowered, unstable hybrid design, or on a traditional, proven design? For the same money you could have a 10 year old Catalina 30 - a vastly superior boat, far safer in the long run. And 5 years from now you could probably get 90% of what you paid for it. The Mac, on the other hand, will be down to 50%. |