Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the Mac25 a better boat than a C&C 32 that never sails and has a host of
long term structural problems? Yes it would be. But I know of no C&C 32s or any C&Cs in my area with problems you list. Can't you manage to stay on topic without belittling yourself with tired trolls? I don't like the Mac26 or any Macs for that matter. I have been aboard the old macs and found them horribly cheap. The new X and M are simply awful. It's my opinion, based on watching them sail and being aboard several. If they sailed well (we all agree they DON'T) it would be another matter. This is a sailing group, Doug. You directed a large portion of your time to a powerboat, which in part explains your easy acceptance of a 26M. But I like sailboats that sail well, that look nice, and that haven't been built to the lowest price point available. I won't defend a Mac anymore than I'd defend a boat with bad decks. I'll leave that to you and Scotty. It's sooooo easy to go the "they're okay for some people" route. Show a little backbone and let's have YOUR opinion. I seem to recall that you claimed you'd NEVER buy the Hunter 19 again after you discovered the weaknesses and quality. But they're "okay for some people?" Or are they just crappy boats? RB |