Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: The original poster claims to already be an experienced sailor. Once more, in a futile attempt to bring some intellectual honesty and rationality into the discussion - - Nope. I never alimed to be an experienced sailor. I claimed to have some experience in sailing fixed hull sailboats in the 30-40 ft range, and I specifically noted that there were more experienced sailors on the ng. I didn't claim to be an expert. Bobsprit wrote: He's also under the impression that Macgregor's design tweaks have transformed the X into a capable sailing boat. The website says so. Nope. (Getting sort of monotonous, isn't it?) What I claimed was that the new boat is a significantly different design. - A new hull having a 15-degree forward V is not the same as a hull having a relatively shallow, 8-degree V. And a dagger board isn't the same thing as a pivotable fin keel requiring a 5-foot longitudinal notch in the hull behind it. (It's not just a "tweeked" 26X.) I also stated that, whether or not these differences made it a "good" boat, it definitely was a "different boat". Just like the website says that the hull has been redesigned with a basically different shape. The website is wrong, and you ought to admit it. If, again, you have any interest in posting truthful, rational comments. DSK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope. (Getting sort of monotonous, isn't it?) What I claimed was that
the new boat is a significantly different design. Let's get something straight. The changes are not huge. The design of the boat remains quite close to the 26X. No large jumps were made. You only have to look at the numbers to see that. Perhaps the M will have marginal advantages. But let's put that is honest perspective. It'll have marginal advantages over a boat with pretty poor sailing characteristics. Is that what you want? RB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote I claimed to have some experience in sailing fixed hull sailboats as opposed to the flex hull of a Mac26XM ? SV |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Cate wrote:
The website is wrong, and you ought to admit it. If, again, you have any interest in posting truthful, rational comments. You have a number of misquotes in your post. FWIW my opinion is that the website is no more truthful than any other advertising, and possibly is a bit less. DSK |