"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
donny, I don't saying your answer was wrong. it is jeffies who says every
answer given but his narrowly defined, case-specific answer is wrong.

however, you still can't have an "opinion" on the sq rt of 2.


I *do* have an opinion about the square root of 2.

Unlike the square root of 50, I think that the square root of 2 has some
practical applications.


Are you saying that you can quote some practical applications for the square
root of 50? If not, then why would you bother forming an opinion about such
a useless figure?


Regards


Donal
--