Despite your attempt to flame "liberals" with this, it seems to me
that you've supported the notion that they were not soft on Iraq
or Saddam. Diplomacy and relative military force were working.
There was no imminent threat, and while there might have been
a reason to invade, it wasn't because of an imminent threat of
WMDs.

"Capt.American" wrote in message
om...
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity
to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver
them.
That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

Yes. Among others of his friends.

SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER
WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS
OIL BUDDIES ???


Capt. American