"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...
Naughty Jeff. Very, very naughty!

What you actually said was :-

"So where in the Colregs does it say you can't run on radar alone? "


That was a really stupid thing to write! Really!

No that was a retorical question. It seems it was well beyond your
limtied
comprehension. In the very next sentence I said a looout was required.

The complete paragraph was:
"So where in the Colregs does it say you can't run on radar alone?

What about the bit that says "a lookout by sight and hearing"?
You portray yourself as an expert on the CollRegs.

Perhaps you would be so kind as to quote the relevant rule - *in full*.
Then you can tell us how your ridiculous statement can be justified?



Of course,
one should always have a visual (and sound) watch, but that is moot if
there is
effectively zero visibility. And yet many vessels maintain their normal
schedule in thick fog."

Just how do you square this with your belief that you may run on Radar
alone?


Since it is obvious that you have been misrepresenting my statement over
and
over, I think you owe me a rather large large apology. Otherwise you are
just
admitting that you're a scumbag of the lowest order, in addition to being
a
coward liar!

Oh dear, oh dear.

You've called me a liar again. You really shoundn't do that.


Please post proof that I lied.

I told you that I only held the "shorebased" qualification. You read, and
replied, to that post.


What did I lie about?



No go away until you're ready to admit that you've been wrong. Or just go
away.


Jeff, you are beating a dead horse.


I'd be grateful if you would apologise for calling me a liar. I don't need
a big apology. A simple acknowledgement that I didn't lie will suffice - at
this point!!!!



Regards


Donal
--