"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote in message
...
Saying "they have no business being there" or "they shouldn't be
there"
is not
the same as claiming its illegal or prohibited. This is all your
fantasy!


So, could you explain, in practical terms what " they have no business
being
there" actually means?


Everyone, including you and Rick have agreed that it is probably foolish
and
foolhardy. It has been generally agreed its not prudent. For the same
reasons
I said "he has no business being there.


The only issue you and Rick raised is that in might be violating ColRegs
until
there is actually an incident. I think it does violate rule 2 and likely
rule
5, but there is no way of proving that.

I think that it is time that we started a new thread about this. See "New
thread".


Regards


Donal.
--