Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. In article , DSK wrote: Peter Wiley wrote: ..... My point is that if you *insist* that ships must travel sufficiently slowly to have the ability to take evasive action/stop on a visual sighting, you are in effect stating that commercial traffic must cease whenever visibility is so poor as to be less than the distance needed to stop/manoeuvre. Which is going to happen more often than you think. For example, night time... or taking a big tow of barges around a bend in the ICW or the Mississippi... Furthermore, this has been going on for a *very* long time, probably all the way back to Hanseatic cogs.... Yeah but technology has moved on since those days. The guy in the kayak cannot expect ships to slow beyond the point where they lose the ability to steer. I guess that for most big ships that this is about 4-5 kts???? Even at 4-5 knots if you're in fog with 50m visibility there's no hope of manoeuvering fast enough to miss an idiot in a kayak. 50m is half of a ship length for my icebreaker. And attempting to maneuver might suck the idiot into the prop, too. Best chance would probably be to ring up 'All Stop' and coast over him, with luck he could surf clear on the bow wave.... Wouldn't work with my ship. CP prop, you'd need to declutch fast and the engines/gearboxes don't like that..... The kayak is taking a chance when he crosses the TSS. However, that does not mean that the ships in the TSS should carry on as if there was no risk. They don't. They monitor their radars and radios. It's small vessels with no radio, no radar and poor/no reflectivity that are at risk - AND THEY HAVE AN OBLIGATION NOT TO IMPEDE THE COMMERCIAL VESSEL. In my opinion the commercial vessel should keep a lookout as required and proceed as if other vessels were also obeying the Colregs. Right. And this is the point that Rick seems to be overlooking. The kayaker is bound to 1- not impede commercial traffic and 2- not create a hazardous condition and by playing around in shipping lanes in fog, he is doing both. Too bad he can't get run over twice! Either Donal & Rick are genuinely incapable of understanding that rights are balanced by responsibilities, All rights are balanced by responsibilities. Have you forgotton where I came in on this? 25 kts in thick fog, in a busy waterway, with no lookout other than radar??????? Please, Peter, try to be sensible! Regards Donal -- |