Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You might not agree with all I've said, but I think I can agree (as usual) with
what you've said. I'm curious: I've claimed at times that Rule 2 has some very deep implications that require reasonable behavior. In particular, if 99% of "seamen" consider some practice foolish, it probably violates rule 2. If they consider it reasonable, it is probably "legal" under rule 2. In this case I might apply this concept to rowboats in shipping lanes in the fog. How do you feel about this? Am I stretching it, or is this an appropriate use of rule 2? "otnmbrd" wrote in message news ![]() G Interesting thread .... shame I can't totally agree and/or disagree, with anyone. There are some boats with some operators, under some conditions where I would consider 25k, in fog, reasonable and safe. There are some boats with some operators, under some conditions where I would consider 25k, in fog, unsafe .... etc. Simply because someone is running in fog, on radar, does not mean they don't have a lookout. Safe speed can be 25k, one minute, and 0 k, the next .... most high speed ferries can stop in their own length .... so forth and so on....... Rule 2 applies to all at all times, under all conditions. G otn |