OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

Well, he's better than the Breck Girl.

"Chris" wrote in message
om...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Hahahahaha...

For Horass, it would be... Don't have a clue.

For Howard Dean it should be....Al Gore says I'm the bestest guy.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

In article , Donal
wrote:

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Excellent work, Neal. Your posts demonstrate a truly superior intellect!!





Listen to President Bush's many speeches

Only a true genius can understand Bush's speeches. The rest of us think
that he is speaking gobbledeegook. You must be really clever if you can
understand what he says.


and even a closed-
minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude
that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included
Iraq in our larger war against terrorists.

Nope! I'm afraid that after we listen to Bush speak for more than 30
seconds, we conclude that he is a complete idiot. After 60 seconds, we
conclude that he is an incredibly dangerous idiot.


Americans are aware
of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the
support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter.

60% of Americans must be illiterate!


Americans don't give a hoot what a bunch of European
socialists have to say. What do they know about it? What
right do any such pacifists have to tell the United States
of America how to prosecute the war against terrorism?
We will do what is in our best interest and to Hell with
all you busybodies sticking your snotty noses where they
don't belong.

heh heh You don't agree with your president on this issue!!

Bush recently said "Please Europe, help me in Iraq. It's all gone
tewwibbly wrong. America needs your supportification."




Evidence of WMD programs has been found.

Dream on.


Read David
Kay's report. It is only a matter of time before actual WMDs
are located and displayed just like it was only a matter of
time before Saddam Hussein was found and just like it's
only a matter time before bin Laden is found and it's
just a matter of time before terrorists are crushed.
But, people like you will not believe the actual evidence any
more than you believe Saddam Hussein tortured and butchered
up hundreds of thousands of his own people.

Who has killed more innocent Iraqis? The Bush family, or Saddam's family?

Saddam's by at least an order of magnitude. Want to count the number of
Kurds killed by chemical weapons? How about the death toll in the
Iran-Iraq war?

How many died because sanctions prevented vital drugs reaching Iraqi
hospitals?

Lots. Who was responsible for not complying with the sanctions for PR
reasons? The then Iraqi Govt. Blaming the USA for this is infantile.

Did you know that birth defects have risen 10 fold since depleted uranium
was used by Bush senior?

Cite please. Did *you* know that chemical weapons and the resultant
pollution are proven teratogenic and carcinogenic agents while DU
isn't? My wife is one of Australia's leading paediatric biochemists,
specialises in genetic disorders.

I suspect you've been following Pilger.

Cancer and Leukemia rates have also gone through the roof!

True but see above.

Donal, I think you're backing a loser with this line of argument.
Better stick to the lack of WMD and personal observations WRT
'intelligence'.

Peter Wiley

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:10:16 -0000, "Nick Temple-Fry"
theP wrote this crap:

All this to support a president who lost the presidential election.

Actually, every recount shows him winning the last election, and every
poll has him winning the next one, dumbass.




This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
Actually, every recount shows him winning the last election, and every
poll has him winning the next one, dumbass.

Actually, the only "recount" I witnessed, was called off in mid-stride, just
after the local news started coming back with reports of uncounted votes. I
can't comment on what I didn't get to see, only what I recall as actually
happening.

Oh, and the polls as we're fed them tend to show his approval rating around
50% until
he pulls a rabbit (or Saddam) out of a hole, wherein the points rise
alittle, and eventually settle back down as he ****es someone else off.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Well, he's better than the Breck Girl.

Who's the Breck Girl?

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Responses interleaved:

Listen to President Bush's many speeches and even a closed-
minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude
that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included
Iraq in our larger war against terrorists. Americans are aware
of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the
support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter.
Americans don't give a hoot what a bunch of European
socialists have to say. What do they know about it? What
right do any such pacifists have to tell the United States
of America how to prosecute the war against terrorism?
We will do what is in our best interest and to Hell with
all you busybodies sticking your snotty noses where they
don't belong.

Then perhaps you'll ask the US Government to stop sticking their snotty
noses in to other peoples business worldwide.

Evidence of WMD programs has been found. Read David
Kay's report. It is only a matter of time before actual WMDs
are located and displayed just like it was only a matter of
time before Saddam Hussein was found and just like it's
only a matter time before bin Laden is found and it's
just a matter of time before terrorists are crushed.

How much time will it take for you to admit you're barking up the wrong
tree. You can't win a war of ideas with guns.
If WMDs are found it will be because the CIA put them there to help Geprge
Bush win the next election.

But, people like you will not believe the actual evidence any
more than you believe Saddam Hussein tortured and butchered
up hundreds of thousands of his own people. Rather than waiting
for evidence of WMDs you'd rather side with a murderous
dictator and do everything you can to allow his activities to
continue.

I'm afraid, yes, our Prime Minister did (against the wishes of the british
people) side with a murderous dictator - George Bush!

Shame on you!

S.Simon

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"Chris" wrote in message
...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Listen to President Bush's many speeches and even a closed-
minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude
that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included
Iraq in our larger war against terrorists. Americans are aware
of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the
support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter.

Which poll? I thought the latest polls show around 50% of americans
aren't
willing to suffer the moron for another term. snip trolling


From: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/NewsStory...orld&OID=40615
"The poll found that in the two days after Saddam's capture, Bush's
overall approval rating rose six points to 58 percent, the
highest level since last July, and up from 52 percent in the four days
before the former Iraqi leader's arrest. "



No doubt the poll was carried out in the state of Florida, and subject to
'recounts' until he approved the result?

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:50:53 +1100, wrote:

Cool, has it dropped back to normal after that ridiculous reaction? Who
the hell do they ask these questions to get a 6% swing that one small
thing. WTF did these people think was going to happen?

Only 6%? Hell, after one of GWB's speeches we had a 12% jump, and we all
know what a rousing orator he is.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...&notFound=true

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

Well, Horass isn't looking very hard... of course, he's pretty stupid,
so what can you expect.

"Chris" wrote in message
om...

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
Actually, every recount shows him winning the last election, and every
poll has him winning the next one, dumbass.

Actually, the only "recount" I witnessed, was called off in mid-stride,
just
after the local news started coming back with reports of uncounted votes.
I
can't comment on what I didn't get to see, only what I recall as actually
happening.

Oh, and the polls as we're fed them tend to show his approval rating
around
50% until
he pulls a rabbit (or Saddam) out of a hole, wherein the points rise
alittle, and eventually settle back down as he ****es someone else off.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

John Edwards

"Chris" wrote in message
om...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Well, he's better than the Breck Girl.

Who's the Breck Girl?