OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

You gonna quibble about two percentage points in a poll
that has an error rate greater than two percent?

I'd say you just lost your argument.

S.Simon

"Chris" wrote in message om...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
From: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/NewsStory...orld&OID=40615
"The poll found that in the two days after Saddam's capture, Bush's
overall approval rating rose six points to 58 percent, the
highest level since last July, and up from 52 percent in the four days
before the former Iraqi leader's arrest. "

Lovely. I thought you said his rating was 60%.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


You gonna quibble about two percentage points in a poll
that has an error rate greater than two percent?

I'd say you just lost your argument.

So you admit you falsified percentage ratings in an approval poll.
Congratulations, you can apply for an anchor position at Fox News or CNN.

Or, if television isn't your game, you could be an editor with Washington
Post or NY Times.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Excellent work, Neal. Your posts demonstrate a truly superior intellect!!





Listen to President Bush's many speeches

Only a true genius can understand Bush's speeches. The rest of us think
that he is speaking gobbledeegook. You must be really clever if you can
understand what he says.


and even a closed-
minded individual such as yourself will be forced to conclude
that WMDs were only one of the several reasons we included
Iraq in our larger war against terrorists.

Nope! I'm afraid that after we listen to Bush speak for more than 30
seconds, we conclude that he is a complete idiot. After 60 seconds, we
conclude that he is an incredibly dangerous idiot.


Americans are aware
of this and it is one of the main reasons Mr. Bush has the
support of close to 60% of Americans polled in this matter.

60% of Americans must be illiterate!


Americans don't give a hoot what a bunch of European
socialists have to say. What do they know about it? What
right do any such pacifists have to tell the United States
of America how to prosecute the war against terrorism?
We will do what is in our best interest and to Hell with
all you busybodies sticking your snotty noses where they
don't belong.

heh heh You don't agree with your president on this issue!!

Bush recently said "Please Europe, help me in Iraq. It's all gone
tewwibbly wrong. America needs your supportification."




Evidence of WMD programs has been found.

Dream on.


Read David
Kay's report. It is only a matter of time before actual WMDs
are located and displayed just like it was only a matter of
time before Saddam Hussein was found and just like it's
only a matter time before bin Laden is found and it's
just a matter of time before terrorists are crushed.
But, people like you will not believe the actual evidence any
more than you believe Saddam Hussein tortured and butchered
up hundreds of thousands of his own people.

Who has killed more innocent Iraqis? The Bush family, or Saddam's family?
How many died because sanctions prevented vital drugs reaching Iraqi
hospitals?
Did you know that birth defects have risen 10 fold since depleted uranium
was used by Bush senior?
Cancer and Leukemia rates have also gone through the roof!


Rather than waiting
for evidence of WMDs you'd rather side with a murderous
dictator and do everything you can to allow his activities to
continue.


Your use of politically correct invective will not fool most people.
What you should have written is:-
"Rather than wait for the UN inspection team to prove that Iraq did not
possess WMD, Bush decided to start a war that would make his friends and
family incredibly rich - and at the same time create thousands more
tourists[sic] - so that he could declare even more wars to generate even
more wealth for his father and his friends."


Shame on you!

The really sad thing is that the idiots who believe Bush aren't making a
penny out of it.

Regards


Donal
--

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Chris" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


You gonna quibble about two percentage points in a poll
that has an error rate greater than two percent?

I'd say you just lost your argument.

So you admit you falsified percentage ratings in an approval poll.
Congratulations, you can apply for an anchor position at Fox News or CNN.

Or, if television isn't your game, you could be an editor with Washington
Post or NY Times.


I 'falsified' nothing.

From the site named:

"One-thousand-fifty-seven adults were polled
December 10-13 prior to Saddam's capture.
The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus
three percentage points."

I would be just as correct saying Bush had a 60
percent approval rating as I would be saying
Bush has a 56 percent. It is within the margin
of error of the poll.

Either way, you lose. Bush is popular and as
long as the economy, which is roaring along
continues to do so and all indications show
it will, Mr. Bush will be a two-term president.

S.Simon

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

All this to support a president who lost the presidential election.

Lost america jobs through his ban on steel imports.

Lost sight of the war on terroism to go against what he thought would be an
easy target and has embroiled america in a military action that will last
between 5 and 40 years.

Lied to America and the world about intelligence on weapons on Mass
Destruction (after all if you can show the UN satellite pictures of their
dispersal how come you can't find them).

Has failed to have any coherent policy on Israel/Palestine.

Walked away from the issues of global warming.

Lets face it Ellen McArthur has more chance of winning a yacht race than any
of the various Bush clan have of being remembered as even adequate political
leaders.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:35:18 GMT, "Chris" wrote
this crap:

Which poll? I thought the latest polls show around 50% of americans aren't
willing to suffer the moron for another term. Mr. Bush is stumbling left
and right, and just watch what happens when he opens his stupid mouth
endorsing that bill banning homosexuals from marriage. The Bush
administration is a sinking ship, and you Simon, are a sinking troll.

The following is the results of the latest CBS poll, which shows that
"Don't Know" is leading the democrats. This is ironic because Don't
Know actually has a better chance of beating President George W. Bush
than Coward Dean.

CHOICE FOR DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE
(Democratic primary voters)
Now
Howard Dean
23%
Wesley Clark
10%
Joe Lieberman
10%
Richard Gephardt
6%
Al Sharpton
5%
John Kerry
4%
John Edwards
2%
Carol Moseley-Braun
1%
Dennis Kucinich
1%
Don’t Know
28%




This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Nick Temple-Fry" theP wrote in message
...
All this to support a president who lost the presidential election.

Lost america jobs through his ban on steel imports.

Lost sight of the war on terroism to go against what he thought would be
an
easy target and has embroiled america in a military action that will last
between 5 and 40 years.

Lied to America and the world about intelligence on weapons on Mass
Destruction (after all if you can show the UN satellite pictures of their
dispersal how come you can't find them).

Has failed to have any coherent policy on Israel/Palestine.

Walked away from the issues of global warming.

Lets face it Ellen McArthur has more chance of winning a yacht race than
any
of the various Bush clan have of being remembered as even adequate
political
leaders.

You forgot one....

Lost the chance to change his surname to anything other than slang for a
woman's sexual organ BEFORE getting involved with politics.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
The following is the results of the latest CBS poll, which shows that
"Don't Know" is leading the democrats. This is ironic because Don't
Know actually has a better chance of beating President George W. Bush
than Coward Dean.

Oddly enough, "don't know, don't tell" should be Bush's campaign slogan.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

Hahahahaha...

For Horass, it would be... Don't have a clue.

"Chris" wrote in message
...

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
The following is the results of the latest CBS poll, which shows that
"Don't Know" is leading the democrats. This is ironic because Don't
Know actually has a better chance of beating President George W. Bush
than Coward Dean.

Oddly enough, "don't know, don't tell" should be Bush's campaign slogan.

OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again.
 

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Hahahahaha...

For Horass, it would be... Don't have a clue.

For Howard Dean it should be....Al Gore says I'm the bestest guy.