Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals
NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus
was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky.

So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that
"surplus" would cover it!

Too bad!

RB

"Simple Simon" wrote
The projected surplus was an optimistic Clinton fabrication
that did not take into account the recession that started
the last year Clinton was in office.

The recession did not start until Mar 2001, after Bush was inaugurated. This is
according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of
recessions and expansions, which is run by a Bush advisor. Although the
official recession (as defined by the "real GDP") was relatively brief,
unemployment increased and over a million jobs were lost during the "recovery."
Thus, the current growth is fueled entirely by increased productivity; those
with jobs are working harder, even though increasing numbers are unemployed.

Correction, the 'downturn in the economy' that lead to
the official recession began during Clinton's last year.

President Bush even mentioned this fact prominently while
he was campaigning while the Democrats all cried 'foul".

So, don't even attempt to revise history and blame the
recession of Mr. Bush. Even the most hard-nosed liberals
must admit the Mr. Bush inherited a souring economy from
the previous administration.

The fact is no Democrat would have taken the necessary
action to bring us out of the recession as fast as Mr. Bush
has. Democrats would have raised taxes and made matters
even worse. That's how stupid they are.

S.Simon


"Jeff Morris" wrote in message news
"Simple Simon" wrote
The projected surplus was an optimistic Clinton fabrication
that did not take into account the recession that started
the last year Clinton was in office.

The recession did not start until Mar 2001, after Bush was inaugurated. This is
according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of
recessions and expansions, which is run by a Bush advisor. Although the
official recession (as defined by the "real GDP") was relatively brief,
unemployment increased and over a million jobs were lost during the "recovery."
Thus, the current growth is fueled entirely by increased productivity; those
with jobs are working harder, even though increasing numbers are unemployed.

Of course he lied. He's a liar. Liars lie. And that's what Bush does... lie.

FYI, the troop to civilian ratio during the Bosnian war was about 24 to 1000
troops to civilians, respectively. In Iraq, it's about 6 to 1000... not
enough to
do a decent job of stabilization. No wonder yet another 60 US troops were
injured today.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals
NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus
was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky.

So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that
"surplus" would cover it!

Too bad!

RB

On 9 Dec 2003 09:26:33 -0800,
(Crackhead Millionaire) wrote this crap:

Hi Simon -

If you are going to list the things that Bush inherited from Clinton,
don't you think the surplus should be in there?


Debt or deficit, the Clinton Administration projections of surpluses
were just that - projections.

Facts from the Treasury:

http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdhisto4.htm.

During the Clinton Administration years the National Debt was as
follows:

09/30/2000 5.67 Trillion
09/30/1999 5.65 Trillion
09/30/1998 5.52 Trillion
09/30/1997 5.41 Trillion
09/30/1996 5.22 Trillion
09/29/1995 4.97 Trillion
09/30/1994 4.69 Trillion
09/30/1993 4.41 Trillion
09/30/1992 4.06 Trillion

Even with the new age math being taught in public schools today, a 6th
grader can see there was no surplus when the government debt continued
to
climb all during the Clinton years.



Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

Thank you for clearing up the so-called surplus.
The Democrats wish everyone to believe there was an actual
surplus so they can claim it was squandered by President
Bush. People seem genuinely surprised when it's pointed
out that it was a projected surplus only - political sleight of
hand. It's amazing how easy it is to brainwash some people.

There needs to be an IQ test administered to all voters.
Stupid and ignorant people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

S.Simon


"Horvath" wrote in message ...
On 9 Dec 2003 09:26:33 -0800,
(Crackhead Millionaire) wrote this crap:

Hi Simon -

If you are going to list the things that Bush inherited from Clinton,
don't you think the surplus should be in there?


Debt or deficit, the Clinton Administration projections of surpluses
were just that - projections.

Facts from the Treasury:

http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdhisto4.htm.

During the Clinton Administration years the National Debt was as
follows:

09/30/2000 5.67 Trillion
09/30/1999 5.65 Trillion
09/30/1998 5.52 Trillion
09/30/1997 5.41 Trillion
09/30/1996 5.22 Trillion
09/29/1995 4.97 Trillion
09/30/1994 4.69 Trillion
09/30/1993 4.41 Trillion
09/30/1992 4.06 Trillion

Even with the new age math being taught in public schools today, a 6th
grader can see there was no surplus when the government debt continued
to
climb all during the Clinton years.



Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

On 09 Dec 2003 18:28:20 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals
NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus
was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky.

So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that
"surplus" would cover it!

No. You lie. The rebate program was to get the economy moving again,
after the eight disastrous years of the Clinton administration.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

No you lie. Or is it your tits?

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 09 Dec 2003 18:28:20 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals
NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus
was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky.

So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying
that
"surplus" would cover it!

No. You lie. The rebate program was to get the economy moving again,
after the eight disastrous years of the Clinton administration.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

The genius with the crappy hunter knows soooo much.
Go back to school. You're outclassed by everyone
here.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 9 Dec 2003 09:26:33 -0800,
(Crackhead Millionaire) wrote this crap:

Hi Simon -

If you are going to list the things that Bush inherited from Clinton,
don't you think the surplus should be in there?


Debt or deficit, the Clinton Administration projections of surpluses
were just that - projections.

Facts from the Treasury:

http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdhisto4.htm.

During the Clinton Administration years the National Debt was as
follows:

09/30/2000 5.67 Trillion
09/30/1999 5.65 Trillion
09/30/1998 5.52 Trillion
09/30/1997 5.41 Trillion
09/30/1996 5.22 Trillion
09/29/1995 4.97 Trillion
09/30/1994 4.69 Trillion
09/30/1993 4.41 Trillion
09/30/1992 4.06 Trillion

Even with the new age math being taught in public schools today, a 6th
grader can see there was no surplus when the government debt continued
to
climb all during the Clinton years.



Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

Take the test again, I'm sure you can pass if you study a lot.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Thank you for clearing up the so-called surplus.
The Democrats wish everyone to believe there was an actual
surplus so they can claim it was squandered by President
Bush. People seem genuinely surprised when it's pointed
out that it was a projected surplus only - political sleight of
hand. It's amazing how easy it is to brainwash some people.

There needs to be an IQ test administered to all voters.
Stupid and ignorant people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

S.Simon


"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 9 Dec 2003 09:26:33 -0800,
(Crackhead Millionaire) wrote this crap:

Hi Simon -

If you are going to list the things that Bush inherited from Clinton,
don't you think the surplus should be in there?


Debt or deficit, the Clinton Administration projections of surpluses
were just that - projections.

Facts from the Treasury:

http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdhisto4.htm.

During the Clinton Administration years the National Debt was as
follows:

09/30/2000 5.67 Trillion
09/30/1999 5.65 Trillion
09/30/1998 5.52 Trillion
09/30/1997 5.41 Trillion
09/30/1996 5.22 Trillion
09/29/1995 4.97 Trillion
09/30/1994 4.69 Trillion
09/30/1993 4.41 Trillion
09/30/1992 4.06 Trillion

Even with the new age math being taught in public schools today, a 6th
grader can see there was no surplus when the government debt continued
to
climb all during the Clinton years.



Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.