Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals
NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky. The projected surplus was an optimistic Clinton fabrication that did not take into account the recession that started the last year Clinton was in office. It did not take into account the damage to the economy 9-11 caused. It did not take into account the necessary expense of the war against terrorism. It did not take into account the necessary tax cuts that are getting the economy back on track. It did not foresee the adverse effects on the stock market caused by crooked corporate leaders who figured if Clinton could get away with crimes why not they? Get down on your knees and say a prayer of thanks to your God that President Bush was elected because people knew he could straighten out the Democrat mess and he has not let the people down. S.Simon "Crackhead Millionaire" wrote in message om... Hi Simon - If you are going to list the things that Bush inherited from Clinton, don't you think the surplus should be in there? Your post also fails to mention that the largest component of job 'gains' were in temporary or retail services; not the kind of jobs America needs. It is not as blunt as Reagan reclassifying all armed forces personnel to employed and gaining a percentage point or two overnight; but to trumpet this type of increased employment as any type of a turnaround is either ignorance or deception. CM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals
NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky. So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that "surplus" would cover it! Too bad! RB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course he lied. He's a liar. Liars lie. And that's what Bush does... lie.
FYI, the troop to civilian ratio during the Bosnian war was about 24 to 1000 troops to civilians, respectively. In Iraq, it's about 6 to 1000... not enough to do a decent job of stabilization. No wonder yet another 60 US troops were injured today. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky. So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that "surplus" would cover it! Too bad! RB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No you lie. Or is it your tits?
"Horvath" wrote in message ... On 09 Dec 2003 18:28:20 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this crap: Sorry about the so-called 'surplus'. What you liberals NEVER mention is calling a spade a spade. The surplus was a 'projected' surplus based upon pie in the sky. So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that "surplus" would cover it! No. You lie. The rebate program was to get the economy moving again, after the eight disastrous years of the Clinton administration. Hero@Horvath I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No you lie. Or is it your tits?
Seriously, Ganz. Very disturbing to keep up with this. RB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you're the one who has trouble keeping it up... at least according
to reports. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... No you lie. Or is it your tits? Seriously, Ganz. Very disturbing to keep up with this. RB |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So then Bush lied AGAIN when he defended his rebate program by saying that
"surplus" would cover it! No. You lie. The rebate program was to get the economy moving again, after the eight disastrous years of the Clinton administration. During his debate with Gore, Bush claimed he would use part of the SURPLUS to pay for the rebates. Now you say the surplus never existed and Bush knew that. You can't have it both ways. Bush LIED. again! RB |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Simple Simon" wrote
The projected surplus was an optimistic Clinton fabrication that did not take into account the recession that started the last year Clinton was in office. The recession did not start until Mar 2001, after Bush was inaugurated. This is according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of recessions and expansions, which is run by a Bush advisor. Although the official recession (as defined by the "real GDP") was relatively brief, unemployment increased and over a million jobs were lost during the "recovery." Thus, the current growth is fueled entirely by increased productivity; those with jobs are working harder, even though increasing numbers are unemployed. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Correction, the 'downturn in the economy' that lead to the official recession began during Clinton's last year. President Bush even mentioned this fact prominently while he was campaigning while the Democrats all cried 'foul". So, don't even attempt to revise history and blame the recession of Mr. Bush. Even the most hard-nosed liberals must admit the Mr. Bush inherited a souring economy from the previous administration. The fact is no Democrat would have taken the necessary action to bring us out of the recession as fast as Mr. Bush has. Democrats would have raised taxes and made matters even worse. That's how stupid they are. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" wrote in message news ![]() "Simple Simon" wrote The projected surplus was an optimistic Clinton fabrication that did not take into account the recession that started the last year Clinton was in office. The recession did not start until Mar 2001, after Bush was inaugurated. This is according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of recessions and expansions, which is run by a Bush advisor. Although the official recession (as defined by the "real GDP") was relatively brief, unemployment increased and over a million jobs were lost during the "recovery." Thus, the current growth is fueled entirely by increased productivity; those with jobs are working harder, even though increasing numbers are unemployed. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT--Another one bites the dust | General | |||
World Trade Towers the truth | General | |||
OT - More Democrat lies | ASA | |||
Democrat Candidates Concede 2004 Election to Bush | ASA |