"Jeff Morris" wrote in message ...
"Simple Simon" wrote:
I will NOT leave Katy or anybody else, for that matter, alone
while they continue to present a disorganized and inaccurate
mess to this group.

Then you should remove your "lesson" on the rules from the web before some naive
newbie reads it.


Jeff,

Have you read it lately? I took your advice and actually
added something about sailboats overtaking to the in-
sight Rules. Here it is if you're too lazy to check it out
for yourself.


"The following list of rules are of more immediate concern to most of you novices. These rules concern how two sailing vessels
should act in meeting, crossing, and passing situations.


1) If the wind is attacking the starboard rail of the sailboat, it is said to be on a starboard tack. The rules state simply:
Starboard tack has the right of way over port tack.


2) When both vessels are on the same tack, the upwind vessel gives way.


3) A sailboat on a port tack, not being sure of tack of the other sailboat (fog or darkness), shall give way.


"Three simple rules and they cover it all. You should know these rules in your sleep.
(Don't forget, however, that a vessel being overtaken is always the stand-on vessel)


"Now, combine these rules with a working knowledge of the ones listed prior to these and you should have a very good basic
understanding of how to carry on while sailing."


Are you happy now?

S.Simon

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:27:16 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote this crap:

Do YOU have a high enough security clearance to take
a former President of the United States out fishing?

I do. I'm a retired military officer.

BTW, you don't need a security clearance to take a former President
out fishing.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

Simple Simon" wrote
....
Are you happy now?


No, your "rules" have a number of blunders, but worse, avoid mentioning most of
the fundamental concepts. You should throw out what you have and re-write them
from scratch. Until then, they are an embarrassment.

Would you like me to repost my earlier critique?

Your earlier critique had little or no validity. About the only
point I can remember is the overtaking thing in the sailing
rules and I have addressed that. You other stuff was just
picky, picky picky.

S.Simon


"Jeff Morris" wrote in message ...
Simple Simon" wrote
...
Are you happy now?


No, your "rules" have a number of blunders, but worse, avoid mentioning most of
the fundamental concepts. You should throw out what you have and re-write them
from scratch. Until then, they are an embarrassment.

Would you like me to repost my earlier critique?

The HELL you don't! Secret service isn't stupid
enough to allow any old fool around Mr. Bush
especially since there has been at least one
known attempt on his life and several unpublicized
attempts as well.

S.Simon


"Horvath" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:27:16 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote this crap:

Do YOU have a high enough security clearance to take
a former President of the United States out fishing?

I do. I'm a retired military officer.

BTW, you don't need a security clearance to take a former President
out fishing.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

I think you're confusing "security screening/check" with "security
clearance" .... I don't doubt mine expired years ago ... G don't care.
However, I don't doubt (unbeknownst to me) I've passed frequent security
screenings/checks, since I deal with the Navy on a frequent basis.....
and that's all that would be required of someone taking Bush senior fishing.

otn

Simple Simon wrote:
The HELL you don't! Secret service isn't stupid
enough to allow any old fool around Mr. Bush
especially since there has been at least one
known attempt on his life and several unpublicized
attempts as well.

S.Simon

Is that when you acquired your tits.... sitting on your fat
ass in the pentagon?

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:27:16 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote this crap:

Do YOU have a high enough security clearance to take
a former President of the United States out fishing?

I do. I'm a retired military officer.

BTW, you don't need a security clearance to take a former President
out fishing.


Hero@Horvath

I don't spend my money on food. I spend most of my money
on women, porn, booze, and recreation. The rest of it I just waste.

I will NOT leave Katy or anybody else, for that matter, alone
while they continue to present a disorganized and inaccurate
mess to this group.

And I will NOT stop tormenting you while you are such a woefully =
derelict representation of mankind....and I will type any way I wish to, =
whether it pleases you or not...and I will post here forever whether you =
care for it or not....kill file me if it bothers your petty little mind =
that much....

--=20
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein

wrote in message
...

Katy's claims of good education are in serious question. All we know is
that she
is an entry level receptionist at a rather small SNF. Her status as an HR
person
is based on the fact that her facility is so small that the receptionist
doubles
as the HR person. She's far from being any sort of professional.

Since when did we judge people by their occupation? This is a Usenet
newsgroup! You get judged by your use of words --- and nothing else.

How are we to judge you??? The evidence in your post(above) would
suggest that you can match Neal for bile, but not for humour.


Regards


Donal
--

How are we to judge you??? The evidence in your post(above) would
suggest that you can match Neal for bile, but not for humour.



And it's "Bile" by a nose!



RB