Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: The navigator© wrote: ...Do you deny that some people know about boat design and can make decisions by inspection about their suitability for sea? No I don't deny any such thing. However I am quite certain that you cannot. say it is not seaworthy. It's ballast ratio is only 25% Where did you get this figure? 420 lbs ballast 1650 lbs diplacement. Yes, that's 25% to me! Perhaas you should invest in a calculator or some math lessons? and it's form stability is lost at 45 degrees. Where did you get this figure? Tell me what you think it should be? Have you even looked at it's crossection? Have you even seen GZ curve for a vessel with slab vertical sides? No I didn't think so, but they are in all good Naval Architecture texts. If that's not bad enough, I suggest she is not weatherly either when the wind picks over a stiff breeze up with a 3'sea. I suggest you are either 1- talking about something with no knowledge and/or 2- talking about a different boat. Wrong on both counts. Cheers MC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
23 ft Trailerable Pocket Cruiser | Boat Building | |||
WTB: Entry Level Bowrider in Ontario | Marketplace | |||
OT--Dem sleaze tactics not working as planned. | General | |||
F.S. Sawyer Cruiser Paddle | UK Paddle | |||
September Great Lakes Cruiser | Cruising |