Capetanios Oz wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:27:04 -0600, "Lady Pilot"
wrote:

LP (thank goodness I didn't go under the knife again!)

So how are the new boobs hangin....or whatever

[whatever isn't what you think it is...]

Pretty crude, Oz.

I don't believe in false "boobs". Anything over a handful is wasted
anyway...

right?

Yeah, anyone but the other guy!

What is with you guys that can't protect yourselves?

I have a monitored security sytem in my home for the last five years...

But it wasn't to protect "the jewels", it was to protect the most precious
thing...my children.

LP (can hit the skeets after two men misses the shot...)

Lady Pilot wrote:



Pretty crude, Oz.

I don't believe in false "boobs". Anything over a handful is wasted
anyway...


More than a mouthful, there's other places for hands... ;-)~~~


Cheers
Marty

Lady Pilot wrote:
I don't believe in false "boobs". Anything over a handful is wasted
anyway...

Define "wasted."

More is better (in this case, up to a certain point at least)


Martin Baxter wrote:
More than a mouthful, there's other places for hands... ;-)~~~

Calls to mind the phrase "Be careful with that, or you'll put somebody's
eye out."

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message ...
Lady Pilot wrote:
I don't believe in false "boobs". Anything over a handful is wasted
anyway...


Lady Pilot is right. Small, firm titties are much more
sexy than large pendulous breasts. (No offense, Babs!)

S.Simon

"Lady Pilot" wrote in message news:lkhwb.37106$yJ.1347@okepread02...
Capetanios Oz wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:27:04 -0600, "Lady Pilot"
wrote:

LP (thank goodness I didn't go under the knife again!)

So how are the new boobs hangin....or whatever

[whatever isn't what you think it is...]

Pretty crude, Oz.

I don't believe in false "boobs". Anything over a handful is wasted
anyway...

right?



ok stop the press ! i have to agree with debby here, smaller are
better than great flapping udders.

though thats only a preference, after all breasts are a place to catch
your breath on the road south.