and pensions from federal orginizations ie:Post Office, State Parks and
national parks and recreation areas in wetland areas, Municiple marinas and
anchorages.
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"two wheels" wrote in message
...
Don't you believe what you write about politics? Why write it
otherwise? I always write exactly what I think about Bush and other
political issues. I'm trying to reveal (to sheltered souls like
yourself) the other part of America--the part that you hardly ever hear
from. We're the conservative part that will gladly help reelect George
W. Bush in 2004.

two wheels


And, so correct you are. The liberal media, to some extent,
still hold sway but they are losing their grip. It comes as
quite a shock to people like Donal who are products of reliance
on the left-wing propaganda machine that the world is not
the world they see. His ideas are not the ideas of the
majority. His view is through an educational system and
political agenda that is failing and failing rapidly.

It is more and more evident that pacifists and liberalism
did not work, does not work and will not work. On the
contrary, liberalism is directly responsible for the growth
of terrorism and the disruption, death and destruction caused
by terrorists. Terrorists need liberals because liberals work
to assist terrorists by taking a pacifist stand. Liberals stand
in the way in the war against terrorism.

S.Simon

And they knew it. I've heard some say that the US behaved just like a
knave or bully by beating up on those who are dropping all weapons -as
demanded. Remember how they were taking apart Al Samoud missiles as
demanded by the US just before the invasion?

Cheers MC



The Carrolls wrote:

What amazes me is they couldn't even parade a truck load of swimming pool
chemicals and draino as chemical weapons. They didn't have any thing in that
country, they were destitute.
"Donal" wrote in message
...

"two wheels" wrote in message
. ..

-----BEGIN IDIOT SIGNED MESSAGE-----

The only thing Bush required, was Saddam's ongoing breach of the 1991
peace treaty, and Saddam's related noncompliance with UN resolution
after UN resolution, for twelve years.

If that is true, then why on earth did Bush, Powell and Blair try so hard

to

convince us that Iraq represented a threat to global security?

Was all that stuff about WMD completely unnecessary? Was the linkage

with

Al Q'aeda also unnecessary?

What were the presentations to the UN all about? Why did Blair produce

the

famous dossiers?

Why do some people put political allegiance above personal integrity?


HEY - Why do some people put political allegiance above personal

integrity?



Regards


Donal
--

When has it been unpatrotic to do every thing reasonable to keep our
military out of harms way?

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
$5... put up or shut up.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"two wheels" wrote in message
...
Don't you believe what you write about politics? Why write it
otherwise? I always write exactly what I think about Bush and other
political issues. I'm trying to reveal (to sheltered souls like
yourself) the other part of America--the part that you hardly ever
hear
from. We're the conservative part that will gladly help reelect George
W. Bush in 2004.

two wheels


And, so correct you are. The liberal media, to some extent,
still hold sway but they are losing their grip. It comes as
quite a shock to people like Donal who are products of reliance
on the left-wing propaganda machine that the world is not
the world they see. His ideas are not the ideas of the
majority. His view is through an educational system and
political agenda that is failing and failing rapidly.

It is more and more evident that pacifists and liberalism
did not work, does not work and will not work. On the
contrary, liberalism is directly responsible for the growth
of terrorism and the disruption, death and destruction caused
by terrorists. Terrorists need liberals because liberals work
to assist terrorists by taking a pacifist stand. Liberals stand
in the way in the war against terrorism.

S.Simon

Rednecks like other people dieing horribly -provided they're not kin.

Cheers MC

The Carrolls wrote:

When has it been unpatrotic to do every thing reasonable to keep our
military out of harms way?

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...

$5... put up or shut up.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"two wheels" wrote in message

. ..

Don't you believe what you write about politics? Why write it
otherwise? I always write exactly what I think about Bush and other
political issues. I'm trying to reveal (to sheltered souls like
yourself) the other part of America--the part that you hardly ever

hear

from. We're the conservative part that will gladly help reelect George
W. Bush in 2004.

two wheels


And, so correct you are. The liberal media, to some extent,
still hold sway but they are losing their grip. It comes as
quite a shock to people like Donal who are products of reliance
on the left-wing propaganda machine that the world is not
the world they see. His ideas are not the ideas of the
majority. His view is through an educational system and
political agenda that is failing and failing rapidly.

It is more and more evident that pacifists and liberalism
did not work, does not work and will not work. On the
contrary, liberalism is directly responsible for the growth
of terrorism and the disruption, death and destruction caused
by terrorists. Terrorists need liberals because liberals work
to assist terrorists by taking a pacifist stand. Liberals stand
in the way in the war against terrorism.

S.Simon

Rednecks like other people dieing horribly

They take bad falls, falling over low-profile fenders!

RB

Now you are being childish again. Just admit you were wrong and learn
from the better sailors here.

Cheers MC

Bobsprit wrote:

Rednecks like other people dieing horribly

They take bad falls, falling over low-profile fenders!

RB

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:46:06 GMT, "The Carrolls"
wrote:

What amazes me is they couldn't even parade a truck load of swimming
pool chemicals and draino as chemical weapons. They didn't have any
thing in that country, they were destitute.

Ask yourself why they didn't. It would be easy to plant the stuff.
Wouldn't it? The reason they didn't is the same reason that I admire
President Bush. He makes his decision and takes the heat. No planting
chemicals. What's there is there.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP8OJWtCBA23eyf45EQLd2wCgr3o1K1wr+bYtSJVrQtECeL RvxikAoNbY
EHSrzfctYOqk+uQM/RJotCd1
=skWP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Or rather, what isn't there isn't, even though we were told it was.

So, basically, Bushy lied to the American people.

"two wheels" wrote in message
news
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:46:06 GMT, "The Carrolls"
wrote:

What amazes me is they couldn't even parade a truck load of swimming
pool chemicals and draino as chemical weapons. They didn't have any
thing in that country, they were destitute.

Ask yourself why they didn't. It would be easy to plant the stuff.
Wouldn't it? The reason they didn't is the same reason that I admire
President Bush. He makes his decision and takes the heat. No planting
chemicals. What's there is there.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP8OJWtCBA23eyf45EQLd2wCgr3o1K1wr+bYtSJVrQtECeL RvxikAoNbY
EHSrzfctYOqk+uQM/RJotCd1
=skWP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:54:33 +0000, two wheels wrote:

Ask yourself why they didn't. It would be easy to plant the stuff.
Wouldn't it? The reason they didn't is the same reason that I admire
President Bush. He makes his decision and takes the heat. No planting
chemicals. What's there is there.

A little twisted in that logic, aren't you? You find the President
admirable because he didn't plant WMD? Virtually everyone else on the
planet would find planting WMD, unethical, immoral, and abhorrent. Taking
the heat would be telling the American people, "I was wrong. Iraq did not
possess Weapons of Mass Destruction." Now, that, would be admirable.

Just to refresh your memory:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:25:41 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:54:33 +0000, two wheels wrote:

Ask yourself why they didn't. It would be easy to plant the stuff.
Wouldn't it? The reason they didn't is the same reason that I admire
President Bush. He makes his decision and takes the heat. No
planting chemicals. What's there is there.

A little twisted in that logic, aren't you? You find the President
admirable because he didn't plant WMD? Virtually everyone else on the
planet would find planting WMD, unethical, immoral, and abhorrent.

I'm not sure they would. I thought grand jury perjury by a sitting
President was serious, but I was wrong. It's nothing much--so said the
US Senate in 1999. Apparently, being conservative is the only real
Presidential crime nowadays.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP8PEDtCBA23eyf45EQJMVgCg2Tvq51WcedwQ479FHrSA0m 7xDaMAn2F8
Nrb0QnvgXijjg2eoHG1YeSqI
=lM3+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----